Literature DB >> 20582230

Matrix strains induced by cells: Computing how far cells can feel.

Shamik Sen1, Adam J Engler, Dennis E Discher.   

Abstract

Many tissue cells exert contractile forces that mechanically couples them to elastic matrices and that influence cell adhesion, cytoskeletal organization, and even cell differentiation. However, strains within the depths of matrices are often unclear and are likely relevant not only to the fact that some matrices such as so-called basement membranes are thin relative to cell dimensions but also to defining how far cells can 'feel'. Here we briefly present experimental results for cell spreading on thin, ligand-coated gels and for prestress in stem cells in relation to gel stiffness. We then introduce a finite element computation in which a cell is placed on an elastic matrix, while matrix elasticity and thickness are varied in order to compute and compare elastostatic deformations within the matrix. Average interfacial strains between cell and matrix show large deviations only when soft matrices are a fraction of the height and width of a cell, proving consistent with experiments. Three-dimensional (3D) cell morphologies that model stem cell-derived neurons, myoblasts, and osteoblasts show that a cylinder-shaped myoblast induces the highest strains, consistent with the prominent contractility of muscle. Groups of such cells show a weak crosstalk in matrix strains, but the cells must be much closer than a cell-width. Cells thus feel on length scales closer to that of adhesions than on cellular scales or higher.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 20582230      PMCID: PMC2891090          DOI: 10.1007/s12195-009-0052-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Mol Bioeng        ISSN: 1865-5025            Impact factor:   2.321


  41 in total

1.  Characteristics of a membrane reservoir buffering membrane tension.

Authors:  D Raucher; M P Sheetz
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Elastic interactions of cells.

Authors:  U S Schwarz; S A Safran
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2002-01-11       Impact factor: 9.161

3.  Neurite branching on deformable substrates.

Authors:  Lisa A Flanagan; Yo-El Ju; Beatrice Marg; Miriam Osterfield; Paul A Janmey
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2002-12-20       Impact factor: 1.837

4.  Determination of cellular strains by combined atomic force microscopy and finite element modeling.

Authors:  Guillaume T Charras; Mike A Horton
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Effects of substrate stiffness on cell morphology, cytoskeletal structure, and adhesion.

Authors:  Tony Yeung; Penelope C Georges; Lisa A Flanagan; Beatrice Marg; Miguelina Ortiz; Makoto Funaki; Nastaran Zahir; Wenyu Ming; Valerie Weaver; Paul A Janmey
Journal:  Cell Motil Cytoskeleton       Date:  2005-01

6.  Adhesion-contractile balance in myocyte differentiation.

Authors:  Maureen A Griffin; Shamik Sen; H Lee Sweeney; Dennis E Discher
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2004-11-02       Impact factor: 5.285

7.  Nonmuscle myosin IIA-dependent force inhibits cell spreading and drives F-actin flow.

Authors:  Yunfei Cai; Nicolas Biais; Gregory Giannone; Monica Tanase; Guoying Jiang; Jake M Hofman; Chris H Wiggins; Pascal Silberzan; Axel Buguin; Benoit Ladoux; Michael P Sheetz
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-08-18       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Taking cell-matrix adhesions to the third dimension.

Authors:  E Cukierman; R Pankov; D R Stevens; K M Yamada
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-11-23       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Intrinsic mechanical properties of the extracellular matrix affect the behavior of pre-osteoblastic MC3T3-E1 cells.

Authors:  Chirag B Khatiwala; Shelly R Peyton; Andrew J Putnam
Journal:  Am J Physiol Cell Physiol       Date:  2006-01-11       Impact factor: 4.249

10.  Myotubes differentiate optimally on substrates with tissue-like stiffness: pathological implications for soft or stiff microenvironments.

Authors:  Adam J Engler; Maureen A Griffin; Shamik Sen; Carsten G Bönnemann; H Lee Sweeney; Dennis E Discher
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2004-09-13       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  49 in total

1.  How deeply cells feel: methods for thin gels.

Authors:  Amnon Buxboim; Karthikan Rajagopal; Andre' E X Brown; Dennis E Discher
Journal:  J Phys Condens Matter       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 2.333

2.  Dissecting Collective Cell Behavior in Polarization and Alignment on Micropatterned Substrates.

Authors:  Shijie He; Chenglin Liu; Xiaojun Li; Shaopeng Ma; Bo Huo; Baohua Ji
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Nonlinear strain stiffening is not sufficient to explain how far cells can feel on fibrous protein gels.

Authors:  Mathilda S Rudnicki; Heather A Cirka; Maziar Aghvami; Edward A Sander; Qi Wen; Kristen L Billiar
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Vascular smooth muscle cell durotaxis depends on substrate stiffness gradient strength.

Authors:  Brett C Isenberg; Paul A Dimilla; Matthew Walker; Sooyoung Kim; Joyce Y Wong
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Matrix elasticity, cytoskeletal forces and physics of the nucleus: how deeply do cells 'feel' outside and in?

Authors:  Amnon Buxboim; Irena L Ivanovska; Dennis E Discher
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 5.285

6.  The effect of substrate stiffness, thickness, and cross-linking density on osteogenic cell behavior.

Authors:  Conleth A Mullen; Ted J Vaughan; Kristen L Billiar; Laoise M McNamara
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Long-range force transmission in fibrous matrices enabled by tension-driven alignment of fibers.

Authors:  Hailong Wang; A S Abhilash; Christopher S Chen; Rebecca G Wells; Vivek B Shenoy
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Substrates with patterned extracellular matrix and subcellular stiffness gradients reveal local biomechanical responses.

Authors:  Peter Tseng; Dino Di Carlo
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 30.849

9.  Geometric control of capillary architecture via cell-matrix mechanical interactions.

Authors:  Jian Sun; Nima Jamilpour; Fei-Yue Wang; Pak Kin Wong
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 12.479

10.  Non-linear elasticity of extracellular matrices enables contractile cells to communicate local position and orientation.

Authors:  Jessamine P Winer; Shaina Oake; Paul A Janmey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-07-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.