Literature DB >> 20581755

Preservation of muscles attached to the C2 and C7 spinous processes rather than subaxial deep extensors reduces adverse effects after cervical laminoplasty.

Hironobu Sakaura1, Noboru Hosono, Yoshihiro Mukai, Takahito Fujimori, Motoki Iwasaki, Hideki Yoshikawa.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective study.
OBJECTIVE: To examine whether preservation of subaxial deep extensor muscles plays any significant role in reducing axial neck pain and unfavorable radiologic changes after cervical laminoplasty in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy and to confirm the benefits of preserving muscles attached to the C2 and C7 spinous processes. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Axial neck pain and unfavorable radiologic changes after cervical laminoplasty have been reported to mostly result from detachment of cervical extensor muscles, particularly muscles attached to the C2 and C7 spinous processes. Other surgeons have reported that preservation of subaxial deep extensor muscles reduces these adverse effects after cervical laminoplasty.
METHODS: Subjects comprised 36 patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy who underwent C3-C6 open-door laminoplasty and were followed up for >24 months. Of these, 18 consecutive patients underwent our modified laminoplasty (muscles-preserved group) and the remaining 18 consecutive patients underwent the conventional procedure (muscles-disrupted group). Both procedures preserved all muscles attached to the C2 and C7 spinous processes. Subaxial deep extensor muscles on the hinged side were also preserved in the muscles-preserved group. Radiologic and clinical data were prospectively collected.
RESULTS: Both groups achieved equal neurologic improvement. Frequencies of axial neck pain showed no significant differences between groups. This value did not vary according to the side of preservation of subaxial deep extensor muscles or the side of muscle disruption. Postoperative loss of lordosis and range of motion of the cervical spine also demonstrated no significant difference between groups.
CONCLUSION: These results indicate that preservation of subaxial deep extensor muscles plays no significant role in reducing axial neck pain and unfavorable radiologic changes after cervical laminoplasty, supporting the hypothesis that these adverse effects after laminoplasty largely result from detachment of muscles attached to the C2 and C7 spinous processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20581755     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d34614

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  19 in total

1.  Prevalence of axial symptoms after posterior cervical decompression: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Miao Wang; Xiao Ji Luo; Qian Xing Deng; Jia Hong Li; Nan Wang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-03-19       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Posterior surgical treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: review article.

Authors:  Paul D Kiely; John C Quinn; Jerry Y Du; Darren R Lebl
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2015-02-10

3.  Anterior approaches for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: which? When? How?

Authors:  Sanford E Emery
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-02-05       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Anterior corpectomy versus posterior laminoplasty for multilevel cervical myelopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xuzhou Liu; Shaoxiong Min; Hui Zhang; Zhilai Zhou; Hehui Wang; Anmin Jin
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-10-05       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Segmental anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion with preservation of middle vertebrae in the surgical management of 4-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Zhonghai Li; Zhenggang Guo; Shuxun Hou; Yantao Zhao; Hongbin Zhong; Shunzhi Yu; Tiesheng Hou
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Clinical and radiological outcomes following microscopic decompression utilizing tubular retractor or conventional microscopic decompression in lumbar spinal stenosis with a minimum of 10-year follow-up.

Authors:  Gun Woo Lee; Soo-Jin Jang; Seung Mok Shin; Jae-Ho Jang; Jae-Do Kim
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2013-08-10

7.  The severity of operative invasion to the posterior muscular-ligament complex influences cervical sagittal balance after open-door laminoplasty.

Authors:  Shengrong Lin; Feifei Zhou; Yu Sun; Zhongqiang Chen; Fengshan Zhang; Shengfa Pan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-10-12       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Operative outcomes for cervical myelopathy and radiculopathy.

Authors:  J G Galbraith; J S Butler; A M Dolan; J M O'Byrne
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2011-10-20

9.  Open-door cervical laminoplasty with preservation of posterior structures.

Authors:  Kalil G Abdullah; Takayuki Yamashita; Michael P Steinmetz; Daniel Lubelski; Jeffrey C Wang; Edward C Benzel; Thomas E Mroz
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2012-03

Review 10.  Neck Pain Following Cervical Laminoplasty: Does Preservation of the C2 Muscle Attachments and/or C7 Matter?

Authors:  K Daniel Riew; Annie L Raich; Joseph R Dettori; John G Heller
Journal:  Evid Based Spine Care J       Date:  2013-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.