Literature DB >> 20581575

Randomized phase II trials: time for a new era in clinical trial design.

Sumithra J Mandrekar1, Daniel J Sargent.   

Abstract

The classic single-arm oncology phase II trial designs for evaluating an experimental regimen/agent are limited by multiple sources of bias arising from the inability to separate trial effects (such as patient selection, trial eligibility, imaging techniques and assessment schedule, and treatment locations) from treatment effect on clinical outcomes. Changes in patient population based on biologic subsetting, newer imaging technologies, the use of alternative end points, constrained resources, and the multitude of promising therapies for a given disease make randomized phase II designs, with a concurrent control arm where necessary, attractive. In this brief report, we discuss the salient features of the randomized designs for phase II trials, which when properly applied under the constraints of their underlying inference framework can assure optimal use of limited phase III financial and patient resources.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20581575      PMCID: PMC2941394          DOI: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e3181e2eadf

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Oncol        ISSN: 1556-0864            Impact factor:   15.609


  11 in total

1.  A flexible design for multiple armed screening trials.

Authors:  D J Sargent; R M Goldberg
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2001-04-15       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Early selection in a randomized phase II clinical trial.

Authors:  Seth M Steinberg; David J Venzon
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2002-06-30       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Randomized phase II trials: what does randomization gain?

Authors:  H Samuel Wieand
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-02-07       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Comparing an experimental agent to a standard agent: relative merits of a one-arm or randomized two-arm Phase II design.

Authors:  Jeremy M G Taylor; Thomas M Braun; Zhiguo Li
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.486

5.  Pick the winner designs in phase II cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  Sumithra J Mandrekar; Daniel J Sargent
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 15.609

6.  Phase II randomized study of two regimens of sequentially administered mitomycin C and irinotecan in patients with unresectable esophageal and gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Maryam B Lustberg; Tanios Bekaii-Saab; Donn Young; Gregory Otterson; William Burak; Abbas Abbas; Barbara McCracken-Bussa; Mark E Lustberg; Miguel A Villalona-Calero
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 15.609

7.  Randomized phase II clinical trials.

Authors:  R Simon; R E Wittes; S S Ellenberg
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep       Date:  1985-12

8.  Paclitaxel-carboplatin alone or with bevacizumab for non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Alan Sandler; Robert Gray; Michael C Perry; Julie Brahmer; Joan H Schiller; Afshin Dowlati; Rogerio Lilenbaum; David H Johnson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-12-14       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 9.  Randomized phase II designs.

Authors:  Larry Rubinstein; John Crowley; Percy Ivy; Michael Leblanc; Dan Sargent
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 12.531

10.  Randomized phase II trial comparing bevacizumab plus carboplatin and paclitaxel with carboplatin and paclitaxel alone in previously untreated locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  David H Johnson; Louis Fehrenbacher; William F Novotny; Roy S Herbst; John J Nemunaitis; David M Jablons; Corey J Langer; Russell F DeVore; Jacques Gaudreault; Lisa A Damico; Eric Holmgren; Fairooz Kabbinavar
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-06-01       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  22 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacogenomics in early-phase oncology clinical trials: is there a sweet spot in phase II?

Authors:  Peter H O'Donnell; Walter M Stadler
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  TOP: Time-to-Event Bayesian Optimal Phase II Trial Design for Cancer Immunotherapy.

Authors:  Ruitao Lin; Robert L Coleman; Ying Yuan
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Bayesian design for two-arm randomized Phase II clinical trials with endpoints from the exponential family using multiple constraints.

Authors:  Wei Jiang; Jo A Wick; Jianghua He; Jonathan D Mahnken; Matthew S Mayo
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 1.051

Review 4.  Radiosensitizers in pancreatic cancer--preclinical and clinical exploits with molecularly targeted agents.

Authors:  Amanda J Walker; Sara R Alcorn; Amol K Narang; Katriana M Nugent; Aaron T Wild; Joseph M Herman; Phuoc T Tran
Journal:  Curr Probl Cancer       Date:  2013-10-05       Impact factor: 3.187

5.  NCI-RTOG translational program strategic guidelines for the early-stage development of radiosensitizers.

Authors:  Yaacov Richard Lawrence; Bhadrasain Vikram; James J Dignam; Arnab Chakravarti; Mitchell Machtay; Boris Freidlin; Naoko Takebe; Walter J Curran; Soren M Bentzen; Paul Okunieff; C Norman Coleman; Adam P Dicker
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2012-12-10       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  All-comers versus enrichment design strategy in phase II trials.

Authors:  Sumithra J Mandrekar; Daniel J Sargent
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 15.609

Review 7.  Targeted therapies in neuroendocrine tumors (NET): clinical trial challenges and lessons learned.

Authors:  James C Yao; Diane Reidy Lagunes; Matthew H Kulke
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2013-04-24

8.  Statistical evaluation of the use of concurrent controls in treatment screening studies.

Authors:  Rickey E Carter; Qian Shi
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 4.689

9.  Controlled multi-arm platform design using predictive probability.

Authors:  Brian P Hobbs; Nan Chen; J Jack Lee
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 3.021

10.  The use of Bayesian hierarchical models for adaptive randomization in biomarker-driven phase II studies.

Authors:  William T Barry; Charles M Perou; P Kelly Marcom; Lisa A Carey; Joseph G Ibrahim
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.051

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.