Literature DB >> 20580854

Whole cell-ELISA to measure the gammaH2AX response of six aneugens and eight DNA-damaging chemicals.

Kaori Matsuzaki1, Asako Harada, Akira Takeiri, Kenji Tanaka, Masayuki Mishima.   

Abstract

The phosphorylated form of the histone protein H2AX (gammaH2AX) plays a central role in sensing and repairing DNA damage and is a sensitive marker for DNA double-strand breaks (DSB). Although a wide range of genotoxic agents that do not initiate DSB induce gammaH2AX, the range of chemicals that cause H2AX phosphorylation is not clear. We designed a novel, whole cell enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (cell-ELISA) that can accurately quantify gammaH2AX levels and identify chemical compounds that induce gammaH2AX formation; our novel assay is more convenient than microscopic examination of gammaH2AX foci or flow cytometry. We measured gammaH2AX levels in CHL, CHO and V79 cells exposed to DNA-damaging, non-genotoxic and aneugenic chemicals using the cell-ELISA assay. The cell-ELISA results for the DNA-damaging compounds (methyl methanesulfonate, N-ethyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine, mitomycin C, cisplatin, irinotecan, etoposide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil) assayed showed that there was a concentration-dependent increase in gammaH2AX, which was 1.5-fold greater than the negative control; the only exception was a negative response of CHO cells to 5-fluorouracil. None of the 10 non-genotoxic compounds assayed showed similar increases in gammaH2AX and all exhibited concentration-dependent growth inhibition of the cells. The highest levels of gammaH2AX found from treatment with aneugens (vincristine, colcemid, paclitaxel, griseofulvin, 17-allylaminogeldanamycin and CH3310395), which are compounds that cause spindle dysfunction and have no genotoxic activity in the Ames test, were 1.5-fold lower than the negative control. In contrast, mitomycin C and etoposide, which both have aneugenic and DNA-damaging activities, induced a positive response. None of the aneugens caused an increase in gammaH2AX at concentrations that induce micronuclei. The chemical classes that show positive results in the cell-ELISA are different from those that are positive in the Ames or in vitro micronucleus test. By using the cell-ELISA for the level of gammaH2AX, we were able to distinguish DNA-damaging agents from non-genotoxic compounds or aneugens. Copyright 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20580854     DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2010.05.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  13 in total

1.  Whole-blood immunoassay for γH2AX as a radiation biodosimetry assay with minimal sample preparation.

Authors:  Matthew L Johnston; Erik F Young; Kenneth L Shepard
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2015-05-03       Impact factor: 1.925

2.  Phosphorylated fraction of H2AX as a measurement for DNA damage in cancer cells and potential applications of a novel assay.

Authors:  Jiuping Ji; Yiping Zhang; Christophe E Redon; William C Reinhold; Alice P Chen; Laura K Fogli; Susan L Holbeck; Ralph E Parchment; Melinda Hollingshead; Joseph E Tomaszewski; Quentin Dudon; Yves Pommier; James H Doroshow; William M Bonner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  DNA damage-associated biomarkers in studying individual sensitivity to low-dose radiation from cardiovascular imaging.

Authors:  Won Hee Lee; Patricia K Nguyen; Dominik Fleischmann; Joseph C Wu
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2016-06-05       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 4.  γ-H2AX and other histone post-translational modifications in the clinic.

Authors:  Christophe E Redon; Urbain Weyemi; Palak R Parekh; Dejun Huang; Allison S Burrell; William M Bonner
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2012-03-09

5.  Influence of selected anti-cancer drugs on the induction of DNA double-strand breaks and changes in gene expression in human hepatoma HepG2 cells.

Authors:  Matjaž Novak; Bojana Žegura; Špela Baebler; Alja Štern; Ana Rotter; Katja Stare; Metka Filipič
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 6.  Use of the γ-H2AX assay to monitor DNA damage and repair in translational cancer research.

Authors:  Alesia Ivashkevich; Christophe E Redon; Asako J Nakamura; Roger F Martin; Olga A Martin
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 8.679

7.  Dynamically monitoring cellular γ-H2AX reveals the potential of carcinogenicity evaluation for genotoxic compounds.

Authors:  Minmin Qu; Hua Xu; Wuju Li; Jia Chen; Yajiao Zhang; Bin Xu; Zhi Li; Tao Liu; Lei Guo; Jianwei Xie
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2021-09-12       Impact factor: 5.153

8.  Recent developments in the use of γ-H2AX as a quantitative DNA double-strand break biomarker.

Authors:  Christophe E Redon; Asako J Nakamura; Olga A Martin; Palak R Parekh; Urbain S Weyemi; William M Bonner
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 5.682

9.  Multiplexed In-cell Immunoassay for Same-sample Protein Expression Profiling.

Authors:  Jing Shang; Pavel Zrazhevskiy; Nadia Postupna; C Dirk Keene; Thomas J Montine; Xiaohu Gao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  Evaluation of chemical phototoxicity, focusing on phosphorylated histone H2AX.

Authors:  Yuko Ibuki; Tatsushi Toyooka
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 2.724

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.