Literature DB >> 20580219

Predictive and prognostic value of KRAS mutations in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with cetuximab: a meta-analysis of 22 studies.

Li-Xin Qiu1, Chen Mao, Jian Zhang, Xiao-Dong Zhu, Ru-Yan Liao, Kai Xue, Jin Li, Qing Chen.   

Abstract

The published data on the predictive and prognostic value of KRAS mutations in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with cetuximab seemed inconclusive. To derive a more precise estimation of the relationship, a meta-analysis was performed. Systematic computerised searches of the PubMed, EMBase, BIOSIS, and SCOPUS were performed. A total of 22 studies were identified. Random-effects model or fix-effects model was used according to between-study heterogeneity. A total of 2188 mCRC patients were included in the final meta-analysis. The rate of KRAS mutations was 38% (829/2188). The overall response rate (ORR) of mutant KRAS patients was 14% (119/829), whereas the ORR of wild-type KRAS patients was 39% (529/1359). The overall pooled relative ratio (RR) for ORR was 0.24 (95% confidence intervals (CI): 0.16-0.38; P<0.01) when mutant KRAS patients were compared with wild-type KRAS patients. Median PFS was significantly shorter in mutant KRAS patients compared with that in wild-type KRAS patients (3.0 versus 5.8 months; HR=1.94; 95% CI: 1.62-2.33; P<0.01). Similarly, median OS was significantly shorter in mutant KRAS patients compared with that in wild-type KRAS patients (6.9 versus 13.5 months; HR=2.17; 95% CI: 1.72-2.74; P<0.01). The meta-analysis strongly suggests that KRAS mutations represent adverse predictive and prognostic biomarkers for tumour response and survival in mCRC patients treated with cetuximab. Patients with tumours that harbour mutant-type KRAS are more likely to have a worse response, PFS, and OS when treated with cetuximab.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20580219     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.05.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  37 in total

Review 1.  Standard chemotherapy with cetuximab for treatment of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Xin-Xiang Li; Lei Liang; Li-Yong Huang; San-Jun Cai
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-06-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Molecular Biomarkers for the Evaluation of Colorectal Cancer: Guideline From the American Society for Clinical Pathology, College of American Pathologists, Association for Molecular Pathology, and American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Authors:  Antonia R Sepulveda; Stanley R Hamilton; Carmen J Allegra; Wayne Grody; Allison M Cushman-Vokoun; William K Funkhouser; Scott E Kopetz; Christopher Lieu; Noralane M Lindor; Bruce D Minsky; Federico A Monzon; Daniel J Sargent; Veena M Singh; Joseph Willis; Jennifer Clark; Carol Colasacco; R Bryan Rumble; Robyn Temple-Smolkin; Christina B Ventura; Jan A Nowak
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 5.568

3.  Mutation Status and Prognostic Value of KRAS and BRAF in Southeast Iranian Colorectal Cancer Patients: First Report from Southeast of Iran.

Authors:  Abolfazl Yari; Arash Samoudi; Asiyeh Afzali; Zahra Miri Karam; Negin Khaje Karimaldini; Maryam Fekri Soofi Abadi; Mahsa Ziasistani; Mohammad Reza Zangouey; Shahriar Dabiri
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2021-06

4.  EGF61 polymorphism predicts complete pathologic response to cetuximab-based chemoradiation independent of KRAS status in locally advanced rectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Siwen Hu-Lieskovan; Daniel Vallbohmer; Wu Zhang; Dongyun Yang; Alexander Pohl; Melissa J Labonte; Peter P Grimminger; Arnulf H Hölscher; Robert Semrau; Dirk Arnold; Kathrin Dellas; Annelies Debucquoy; Karin Haustermans; Jean-Pascal H Machiels; Christine Sempoux; Claus Rödel; Matej Bracko; Vaneja Velenik; Heinz-Josef Lenz
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-06-14       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 5.  Clinical applications of liquid biopsies in gastrointestinal oncology.

Authors:  Jason Zhu; John H Strickler
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2016-10

6.  Targeted treatments for metastatic esophageal squamous cell cancer.

Authors:  Antonia Digklia; Ioannis A Voutsadakis
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2013-05-15

Review 7.  KRAS as prognostic biomarker in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with bevacizumab: a pooled analysis of 12 published trials.

Authors:  Fausto Petrelli; Andrea Coinu; Mary Cabiddu; Mara Ghilardi; Sandro Barni
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 8.  Brain tumor microvesicles: insights into intercellular communication in the nervous system.

Authors:  Kristan E van der Vos; Leonora Balaj; Johan Skog; Xandra O Breakefield
Journal:  Cell Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2011-05-08       Impact factor: 5.046

9.  KRAS G>A mutation favors poor tumor differentiation but may not be associated with prognosis in patients with curatively resected duodenal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Tao Fu; Angela A Guzzetta; Jana Jeschke; Rajita Vatapalli; Pujan Dave; Craig M Hooker; Richard Morgan; Christine A Iacobuzio-Donahue; Baohua Liu; Nita Ahuja
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 7.396

10.  KRAS mutational analysis for colorectal cancer. Application: pharmacogenomic.

Authors:  Grace Wang; Robin K Kelley
Journal:  PLoS Curr       Date:  2010-09-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.