BACKGROUND: Traumatic posterior sternoclavicular joint injuries are rare, but complications are common and include brachial plexus and vascular injury, esophageal rupture, and death. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The records of 21 patients treated at our institution for a posterior sternoclavicular injury were reviewed. All patients underwent a trial of closed reduction, which was effective in 8 patients (group I). The remaining 13 patients were treated with open reduction and sternoclavicular joint reconstruction (group II). RESULTS: Closed reduction was more likely to be successful (P < .05) in dislocations treated within 10 days of injury. Patients were evaluated by use of the University of California, Los Angeles rating scale. Overall, 18 of 21 patients were graded as good or excellent. Patients treated with either open or closed reduction as their definitive management compared favorably in terms of ratings for pain, strength, and motion. CONCLUSION: Our experience suggests that closed reduction compares favorably with open reduction. Of patients treated, 38% required only closed reduction as their definitive treatment. In this series early closed reduction was successful and obviated the risks of surgery. Patients who in whom closed reduction failed obtained good results with operative treatment aimed at reconstruction of the costoclavicular ligaments.
BACKGROUND:Traumatic posterior sternoclavicular joint injuries are rare, but complications are common and include brachial plexus and vascular injury, esophageal rupture, and death. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The records of 21 patients treated at our institution for a posterior sternoclavicular injury were reviewed. All patients underwent a trial of closed reduction, which was effective in 8 patients (group I). The remaining 13 patients were treated with open reduction and sternoclavicular joint reconstruction (group II). RESULTS: Closed reduction was more likely to be successful (P < .05) in dislocations treated within 10 days of injury. Patients were evaluated by use of the University of California, Los Angeles rating scale. Overall, 18 of 21 patients were graded as good or excellent. Patients treated with either open or closed reduction as their definitive management compared favorably in terms of ratings for pain, strength, and motion. CONCLUSION: Our experience suggests that closed reduction compares favorably with open reduction. Of patients treated, 38% required only closed reduction as their definitive treatment. In this series early closed reduction was successful and obviated the risks of surgery. Patients who in whom closed reduction failed obtained good results with operative treatment aimed at reconstruction of the costoclavicular ligaments.
Authors: Frank Martetschläger; Sepp Braun; Stephan Lorenz; Andreas Lenich; Andreas B Imhoff Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2015-03-11 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Jarrad A Merriman; Diego Villacis; Brian Wu; Dakshesh Patel; Anthony Yi; George F Rick Hatch Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2014-08-12 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Juan C Quispe; Benoit Herbert; Vivek P Chadayammuri; Ji Wan Kim; Jiandong Hao; Mark Hake; David J Hak; Philip F Stahel; Cyril Mauffrey Journal: Int Orthop Date: 2015-08-11 Impact factor: 3.075
Authors: Justin S Yang; Ljiljana Bogunovic; Robert H Brophy; Rick W Wright; Reggie Scott; Matthew Matava Journal: Sports Health Date: 2015-07 Impact factor: 3.843