Literature DB >> 25113266

Does patient sex affect the anatomic relationships between the sternoclavicular joint and posterior vascular structures?

Jarrad A Merriman1, Diego Villacis, Brian Wu, Dakshesh Patel, Anthony Yi, George F Rick Hatch.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite increased concern for injury during surgical reconstruction of the sternoclavicular joint, to our knowledge there are few studies detailing the vascular relationships adjacent to the joint. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We investigated sex differences in the following relationships for sternoclavicular joint reconstruction: (1) safe distance from the posterior surface of the medial clavicle's medial and lateral segments to the major vessels, (2) length of the first costal cartilage and safe distance from the first rib to the internal mammary artery, (3) minimum distance medial to the sternoclavicular joint for optimal hole placement, and (4) safe distance from the manubrium to the great vessels.
METHODS: Fifty normal postcontrast CT scans of the chest were reviewed. Means, standard deviations, and 95% CI were calculated for each aforementioned measurement. A t-test was used to determine if a sex difference exists (p≤0.05).
RESULTS: At the medial end of the clavicle, the safe distance from the medial segment (first 10 mm) to the major vessels was greater in males than in females (3.5 mm versus 2.4 mm, respectively; 95% CI, 3 mm-4 mm versus 1.7 mm-3 mm, respectively; p=0.014). For the lateral segment (next 10 mm), the distance also was safer in males than in females (3.3 mm versus 1.7 mm, respectively; 95% CI, 2.7 mm-4 mm versus 1.1 mm-2.3 mm, respectively; p<0.001). The mean length of the first costal cartilage also was greater in males (35.8 mm versus 30.1 mm, respectively; 95% CI, 33.8 mm-37.8 mm versus 28.5 mm-31.9 mm, respectively; p<0.001); the distance from the first costochondral joint to the internal mammary artery was safer in males than in females (19.1 mm versus 15.4 mm, respectively; 95% CI, 16.5 mm-21.8 mm versus 13 mm-17.9 mm, respectively; p=0.05). The minimum distance to avoid inadvertent penetration of the sternoclavicular joint was greater in males than in females (16 mm versus 12.3 mm, respectively; 95% CI, 14.6 mm-17.5 mm versus 11 mm-13.6 mm, respectively; p<0.001). The distance to vessels after penetration of the manubrium was not different between males and females (5.6 mm versus 3.9, respectively; 95% CI, 4.4 mm-6.8 mm versus 2.6 mm-5.2 mm, respectively; p=0.06).
CONCLUSIONS: This study makes apparent the intimate relationships between vessels and the musculoskeletal structures associated with sternoclavicular reconstruction. Based on our findings, we recommend considering the sex of the patient, using caution when drilling, and protecting essential structures posterior to the joint.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25113266      PMCID: PMC4182408          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-014-3853-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  29 in total

1.  A 'safe' surgical technique for stabilisation of the sternoclavicular joint: a cadaveric and clinical study.

Authors:  D P Thomas; P R Williams; H C Hoddinott
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Ligamentous restraints to anterior and posterior translation of the sternoclavicular joint.

Authors:  Edwin E Spencer; John E Kuhn; Laura J Huston; James E Carpenter; Richard E Hughes
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.019

3.  Biomechanical analysis of reconstructions for sternoclavicular joint instability.

Authors:  Edwin E Spencer; John E Kuhn
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Direct observations on the function of the capsule of the sternoclavicular joint in clavicular support.

Authors:  J G Bearn
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1967-01       Impact factor: 2.610

5.  Sternoclavicular dislocations.

Authors:  J L Nettles; R L Linscheid
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1968-03

6.  Retrosternal dislocation of the clavicle producing thoracic outlet syndrome.

Authors:  D M Gangahar; T Flogaites
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1978-05

7.  Resection arthroplasty of the sternoclavicular joint for the treatment of primary degenerative sternoclavicular arthritis.

Authors:  Andreas Pingsmann; Theodore Patsalis; Ivo Michiels
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2002-05

8.  Dislocations of the sternoclavicular joint.

Authors:  M G Dennis; F J Kummer; J D Zuckerman
Journal:  Bull Hosp Jt Dis       Date:  2000

9.  Clinical outcome after reconstruction for sternoclavicular joint instability using a sternocleidomastoid tendon graft.

Authors:  Ofir Uri; Konstantinos Barmpagiannis; Deborah Higgs; Mark Falworth; Susan Alexander; Simon M Lambert
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 10.  Complications of treatment of acromioclavicular and sternoclavicular joint injuries.

Authors:  J R Rudzki; Matthew J Matava; George A Paletta
Journal:  Clin Sports Med       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.182

View more
  2 in total

1.  Medial Clavicle Osseous Dimensions with Implication on Plate Fixation.

Authors:  W Jeffrey Grantham; Schuyler J Halverson; Donald H Lee
Journal:  Tech Shoulder Elb Surg       Date:  2019-03

2.  MEASURING THE DISTANCE BETWEEN STERNOCLAVICULAR JOINT AND HILAR STRUCTURES WITH TOMOGRAPHY.

Authors:  Wilson Carlos Sola; Tiago Augusto Colferai; Carlos Henrique Ramos; Paulo Sérgio Dos Santos; Juliano Santini Gerlack; André Francisco Gomes
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2018 May-Jun       Impact factor: 0.513

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.