BACKGROUND: Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is a common disorder with multiple options for treatment, ranging from medical interventions, surgical revascularization, and endovascular therapy. Despite the explosive advances in endovascular therapy, cost-effective methods of care have not been well defined. We analyze therapeutic strategies, outcomes, and medical cost of treatment among Medicare patients with PAD. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients who underwent therapy for PAD were identified from a 5% random sample of Medicare beneficiaries from Medicare Standard Analytic Files for the period 1999-2005. Clinical outcomes (death, amputation, new clinical symptoms related to PAD) and direct medical costs were examined by chosen revascularization options (endovascular, surgical, and combinations). One-year PAD prevalence increased steadily from 8.2% in 1999 to 9.5% in 2005. The risk-adjusted time to first post-treatment clinical outcome was lowest in those treated with "percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) or atherectomy and stents" (HR, 0.829; 95% CI, 0.793-0.865; p < 0.001) and stents only (HR, 0.904; 95% CI, 0.848-0.963; p = 0.002) compared with PTA alone. The lowest per patient risk-adjusted costs during the quarter of the first observed treatment were associated with "PTA and stents" ($15,197), and stents only ($15,867). Risk-adjusted costs for surgical procedures (bypass and endarterectomy) were $27,021 during the same period. Diabetes was present in 61.7% of the PAD population and was associated with higher risks of clinical events and higher medical costs compared with PAD patients without diabetes. CONCLUSION: The clinical and economic burden of PAD in the Medicare population is substantial, and the interventions used to treat PAD are associated with differences in clinical and economic outcomes. Prospective cost-effectiveness analyses should be included in future PAD therapy trials to inform payers and providers of the relative value of available treatment options. Copyright (c) 2010 Annals of Vascular Surgery Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND:Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is a common disorder with multiple options for treatment, ranging from medical interventions, surgical revascularization, and endovascular therapy. Despite the explosive advances in endovascular therapy, cost-effective methods of care have not been well defined. We analyze therapeutic strategies, outcomes, and medical cost of treatment among Medicare patients with PAD. METHODS AND RESULTS:Patients who underwent therapy for PAD were identified from a 5% random sample of Medicare beneficiaries from Medicare Standard Analytic Files for the period 1999-2005. Clinical outcomes (death, amputation, new clinical symptoms related to PAD) and direct medical costs were examined by chosen revascularization options (endovascular, surgical, and combinations). One-year PAD prevalence increased steadily from 8.2% in 1999 to 9.5% in 2005. The risk-adjusted time to first post-treatment clinical outcome was lowest in those treated with "percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) or atherectomy and stents" (HR, 0.829; 95% CI, 0.793-0.865; p < 0.001) and stents only (HR, 0.904; 95% CI, 0.848-0.963; p = 0.002) compared with PTA alone. The lowest per patient risk-adjusted costs during the quarter of the first observed treatment were associated with "PTA and stents" ($15,197), and stents only ($15,867). Risk-adjusted costs for surgical procedures (bypass and endarterectomy) were $27,021 during the same period. Diabetes was present in 61.7% of the PAD population and was associated with higher risks of clinical events and higher medical costs compared with PAD patients without diabetes. CONCLUSION: The clinical and economic burden of PAD in the Medicare population is substantial, and the interventions used to treat PAD are associated with differences in clinical and economic outcomes. Prospective cost-effectiveness analyses should be included in future PAD therapy trials to inform payers and providers of the relative value of available treatment options. Copyright (c) 2010 Annals of Vascular Surgery Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors: Andrew W Gardner; Polly S Montgomery; Ana I Casanegra; Federico Silva-Palacios; Zoltan Ungvari; Anna Csiszar Journal: Age (Dordr) Date: 2016-06-06
Authors: Manesh R Patel; Michael S Conte; Donald E Cutlip; Nabil Dib; Patrick Geraghty; William Gray; William R Hiatt; Mami Ho; Koji Ikeda; Fumiaki Ikeno; Michael R Jaff; W Schuyler Jones; Masayuki Kawahara; Robert A Lookstein; Roxana Mehran; Sanjay Misra; Lars Norgren; Jeffrey W Olin; Thomas J Povsic; Kenneth Rosenfield; John Rundback; Fadi Shamoun; James Tcheng; Thomas T Tsai; Yuka Suzuki; Pascal Vranckx; Bret N Wiechmann; Christopher J White; Hiroyoshi Yokoi; Mitchell W Krucoff Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2015-03-10 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Andrew W Gardner; Polly S Montgomery; Yan D Zhao; Zoltan Ungvari; Anna Csiszar; William E Sonntag Journal: Angiology Date: 2017-08-24 Impact factor: 3.619
Authors: Joshua A Beckman; Meredith S Duncan; Charles W Alcorn; Kaku So-Armah; Adeel A Butt; Matthew Bidwell Goetz; Hilary A Tindle; Jason J Sico; Russel P Tracy; Amy C Justice; Matthew S Freiberg Journal: Circulation Date: 2018-03-13 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: James V Freeman; David W Hutton; Geoffrey D Barnes; Ruo P Zhu; Douglas K Owens; Alan M Garber; Alan S Go; Mark A Hlatky; Paul A Heidenreich; Paul J Wang; Amin Al-Ahmad; Mintu P Turakhia Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2016-06
Authors: Adelaide M Arruda-Olson; Homam Moussa Pacha; Naveed Afzal; Sara Abram; Bradley R Lewis; Iyad Isseh; Raad Haddad; Christopher G Scott; Kent Bailey; Hongfang Liu; Thom W Rooke; Iftikhar J Kullo Journal: Vasc Med Date: 2017-10-25 Impact factor: 3.239