| Literature DB >> 25744011 |
Manesh R Patel1, Michael S Conte2, Donald E Cutlip3, Nabil Dib4, Patrick Geraghty5, William Gray6, William R Hiatt7, Mami Ho8, Koji Ikeda9, Fumiaki Ikeno10, Michael R Jaff11, W Schuyler Jones12, Masayuki Kawahara8, Robert A Lookstein13, Roxana Mehran14, Sanjay Misra15, Lars Norgren16, Jeffrey W Olin13, Thomas J Povsic12, Kenneth Rosenfield17, John Rundback18, Fadi Shamoun19, James Tcheng12, Thomas T Tsai20, Yuka Suzuki21, Pascal Vranckx22, Bret N Wiechmann23, Christopher J White24, Hiroyoshi Yokoi25, Mitchell W Krucoff12.
Abstract
The lack of consistent definitions and nomenclature across clinical trials of novel devices, drugs, or biologics poses a significant barrier to accrual of knowledge in and across peripheral artery disease therapies and technologies. Recognizing this problem, the Peripheral Academic Research Consortium, together with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the Japanese Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency, has developed a series of pragmatic consensus definitions for patients being treated for peripheral artery disease affecting the lower extremities. These consensus definitions include the clinical presentation, anatomic depiction, interventional outcomes, surrogate imaging and physiological follow-up, and clinical outcomes of patients with lower-extremity peripheral artery disease. Consistent application of these definitions in clinical trials evaluating novel revascularization technologies should result in more efficient regulatory evaluation and best practice guidelines to inform clinical decisions in patients with lower extremity peripheral artery disease.Entities:
Keywords: amputation; foot; intermittent claudication; leg; myocardial infarction; stroke
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25744011 PMCID: PMC4874808 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.12.036
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol ISSN: 0735-1097 Impact factor: 24.094