Literature DB >> 20579121

Shared decision making in oncology: assessing oncologist behaviour in consultations in which adjuvant therapy is considered after primary surgical treatment.

Simron Singh1, Phyllis Butow, Margaret Charles, Martin H N Tattersall.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Shared decision making (SDM) is now considered a desirable goal in health care, yet little is known about current practice in cancer care, and its impact on patient outcomes. This study aimed to develop an oncology-specific coding system for SDM, explore variations in SDM according to patient and disease characteristics, determine the relationship between SDM and patient satisfaction with the consultation, and explore the impact of SDM on patient anxiety.
METHODS: Sixty-three medical and radiation oncology consultations with patients with primary cancer involving consideration of adjuvant therapy after surgery were audio-taped, transcribed and coded. Intra and inter-rater reliability of the coding system was 95 and 90% respectively. Patients completed questionnaires before and after the consultation.
RESULTS: Construct validity of the SDM coding system was successfully conducted. Oncologists demonstrated on average under 11 of 18 SDM behaviours. Behaviours seeking patient preferences were particularly rare. SDM behaviours were more apparent in consultations involving female breast cancer patients. SDM behaviour scores in combination with patient involvement preference could predict achievement of patient involvement preference but not overall patient satisfaction. Although there was no overall relationship between patient anxiety and SDM scores, it did appear that physicians may change SDM behaviour according to patient factors including anxiety.
CONCLUSION: Our findings reinforce the importance of the doctor in facilitating shared decision making in oncology consultations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20579121      PMCID: PMC5060538          DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2009.00587.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Expect        ISSN: 1369-6513            Impact factor:   3.377


  25 in total

Review 1.  Shared decision making: developing the OPTION scale for measuring patient involvement.

Authors:  G Elwyn; A Edwards; M Wensing; K Hood; C Atwell; R Grol
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2003-04

2.  Cancer consultation preparation package: changing patients but not physicians is not enough.

Authors:  Phyllis Butow; Rhonda Devine; Michael Boyer; Susan Pendlebury; Michael Jackson; Martin H N Tattersall
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-11-01       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Decisional regret and quality of life after participating in medical decision-making for early-stage prostate cancer.

Authors:  B J Davison; S L Goldenberg
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.588

4.  Are patients' decision-making preferences being met?

Authors:  Sarah Ford; Theo Schofield; Tony Hope
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.377

5.  What are the ingredients for a successful evidence-based patient choice consultation?: A qualitative study.

Authors:  Sarah Ford; Theo Schofield; Tony Hope
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 6.  Patient participation in the patient-provider interaction: the effects of patient question asking on the quality of interaction, satisfaction and compliance.

Authors:  D L Roter
Journal:  Health Educ Monogr       Date:  1977

7.  Patient participation in treatment decision making and the psychological consequences of breast cancer surgery.

Authors:  A Moyer; P Salovey
Journal:  Womens Health       Date:  1998

8.  Validation of a tool to assess health practitioners' decision support and communication skills.

Authors:  Pierrette Guimond; Helen Bunn; Annette M O'Connor; Mary Jane Jacobsen; Valerie K Tait; Elizabeth R Drake; Ian D Graham; Dawn Stacey; Tom Elmslie
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2003-07

9.  Self-reported use of shared decision-making among breast cancer specialists and perceived barriers and facilitators to implementing this approach.

Authors:  Cathy Charles; Amiram Gafni; Tim Whelan
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.377

10.  Promoting patient participation and shortening cancer consultations: a randomised trial.

Authors:  R F Brown; P N Butow; S M Dunn; M H Tattersall
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2001-11-02       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  27 in total

1.  Measuring chronic condition self-management in an Australian community: factor structure of the revised Partners in Health (PIH) scale.

Authors:  David Smith; Peter Harvey; Sharon Lawn; Melanie Harris; Malcolm Battersby
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Consultations between patients with breast cancer and surgeons: a pathway from patient-centered communication to reduced hopelessness.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Robinson; Donald R Hoover; Maria K Venetis; Thomas J Kearney; Richard L Street
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-12-10       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Development and psychometric evaluation of the Decisional Engagement Scale (DES-10): A patient-reported psychosocial survey for quality cancer care.

Authors:  Michael Hoerger; Benjamin P Chapman; Supriya G Mohile; Paul R Duberstein
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2016-09

Review 4.  The quality of instruments to assess the process of shared decision making: A systematic review.

Authors:  Fania R Gärtner; Hanna Bomhof-Roordink; Ian P Smith; Isabelle Scholl; Anne M Stiggelbout; Arwen H Pieterse
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Where is the evidence? A systematic review of shared decision making and patient outcomes.

Authors:  L Aubree Shay; Jennifer Elston Lafata
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 2.583

6.  Development of a shared decision making coding system for analysis of patient-healthcare provider encounters.

Authors:  Marla L Clayman; Gregory Makoul; Maya M Harper; Danielle G Koby; Adam R Williams
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2012-07-09

Review 7.  Assessments of the extent to which health-care providers involve patients in decision making: a systematic review of studies using the OPTION instrument.

Authors:  Nicolas Couët; Sophie Desroches; Hubert Robitaille; Hugues Vaillancourt; Annie Leblanc; Stéphane Turcotte; Glyn Elwyn; France Légaré
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 3.377

8.  Conveying genomic recurrence risk estimates to patients with early-stage breast cancer: oncologist perspectives.

Authors:  Elizabeth Spellman; Nadiyah Sulayman; Susan Eggly; Beth N Peshkin; Claudine Isaacs; Marc D Schwartz; Suzanne C O'Neill
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 3.894

9.  A survey of breast cancer physicians regarding patient involvement in breast cancer treatment decisions.

Authors:  Grace Clarke Hillyer; Dawn L Hershman; Lawrence H Kushi; Lois Lamerato; Christine B Ambrosone; Dana H Bovbjerg; Jeanne S Mandelblatt; Sargam Rana; Alfred I Neugut
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2012-10-27       Impact factor: 4.380

10.  Communicative characteristics of interactions between surgeons and Chinese women with breast cancer in oncology consultation: a conversation analysis.

Authors:  Sungwon Yoon; Miranda Chan; Wai Ka Hung; Marcus Ying; Amy Or; Wendy W T Lam
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 3.377

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.