Literature DB >> 20579097

Effects of clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa on Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm formation.

Maria Pihl1, Luis E Chávez de Paz, Artur Schmidtchen, Gunnel Svensäter, Julia R Davies.   

Abstract

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is often found in chronic infections, including cystic fibrosis lung infections and those related to chronic wounds and venous ulcers. At the latter sites, P. aeruginosa can be isolated together with Staphylococcus epidermidis, and we have therefore explored the effect of clinical isolates and laboratory strains of P. aeruginosa strains on colonization by S. epidermidis in dual-species biofilms. Biofilm formation was assayed using 16S rRNA FISH and confocal laser scanning microscopy. Among the six P. aeruginosa strains tested, one particular strain, denoted 14:2, exerted a significant inhibitory effect, and even after 6 h, S. epidermidis levels in dual-species biofilms were reduced by >85% compared with those without P. aeruginosa. Interestingly, strain 14:2 was found to be negative for classical virulence determinants including pyocyanin, elastase and alkaline protease. Therefore, we suggest that less virulent phenotypes of P. aeruginosa, which may develop over time in chronic infections, could counteract colonization by S. epidermidis, ensuring persistence and dominance by P. aeruginosa in the host micro-habitat. Further studies are required to explain the inhibitory effect on S. epidermidis, although extracellular polysaccharides produced by P. aeruginosa might play a role in this phenomenon.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20579097     DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2010.00707.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol        ISSN: 0928-8244


  9 in total

Review 1.  In vivo and In vitro Interactions between Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus spp.

Authors:  An Hotterbeekx; Samir Kumar-Singh; Herman Goossens; Surbhi Malhotra-Kumar
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 5.293

2.  A Simple Polymicrobial Biofilm Keratinocyte Colonization Model for Exploring Interactions Between Commensals, Pathogens and Antimicrobials.

Authors:  Elena Jordana-Lluch; Vanina Garcia; Alexander D H Kingdon; Nishant Singh; Cameron Alexander; Paul Williams; Kim R Hardie
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 5.640

3.  Integrated photothermal decontamination device for N95 respirators.

Authors:  Marcelo Muñoz; Maxime Comtois-Bona; David Cortes; Cagla Eren Cimenci; Qiujiang Du; Collin Thompson; Juan David Figueroa; Vivian Franklin; Peter Liu; Emilio I Alarcon
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  Presence of non-oral bacteria in the oral cavity.

Authors:  Nawel Zaatout
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 2.552

5.  Quorum-sensing effector pyocyanin but not farnesol & acyl homoserine lactone exhibit antibacterial activity.

Authors:  Nakshdeep Kaur Kahlon; Anayata Sharma; Himika Dogra; Rachna Singh
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 5.274

6.  Comparative analysis of single-species and polybacterial wound biofilms using a quantitative, in vivo, rabbit ear model.

Authors:  Akhil K Seth; Matthew R Geringer; Seok J Hong; Kai P Leung; Robert D Galiano; Thomas A Mustoe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Cooperative pathogenicity in cystic fibrosis: Stenotrophomonas maltophilia modulates Pseudomonas aeruginosa virulence in mixed biofilm.

Authors:  Arianna Pompilio; Valentina Crocetta; Serena De Nicola; Fabio Verginelli; Ersilia Fiscarelli; Giovanni Di Bonaventura
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 5.640

8.  Prevalence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter spp. in subgingival biofilm and saliva of subjects with chronic periodontal infection.

Authors:  Renata Souto; Carina M Silva-Boghossian; Ana Paula Vieira Colombo
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 2.476

9.  Gram positive and Gram negative bacteria differ in their sensitivity to cold plasma.

Authors:  Anne Mai-Prochnow; Maryse Clauson; Jungmi Hong; Anthony B Murphy
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.