Melanie L Richards1. 1. Mayo Clinic, Department of Surgery, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA. richards.melanie@mayo.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Well-differentiated thyroid cancer accounts for 95% of thyroid malignancies, and 5% of these patients will have familial disease. This compares to 25% of patients with medullary thyroid cancer (MTC) having a familial form; however, this accounts for only 1% of all patients with thyroid cancer. Most cases of familial thyroid cancer are nonmedullary (NMFTC), and have been shown to be present in familial cancer syndromes such as familial adenomatous polyposis, Cowden syndrome, Carney complex, Pendred syndrome, and Werner syndrome. This review discusses the contemporary management of the patients with familial-syndrome-associated thyroid cancer based on their individual risks for developing thyroid cancer. SUMMARY: Most of the progress in the genetics of familial thyroid cancer has been in patients with MTC. The mutations in patients with isolated NMFTC have not been as well defined as in MTC. They are likely autosomal dominant with reduced penetrance. The patients with these familial syndromes most likely have a susceptibility gene that increases the risk of thyroid cancer. Most of the patients with a familial syndrome and NMFTC will have papillary thyroid carcinoma, suggesting that a specific gene for papillary thyroid carcinoma may also be present. In many cases, patients have a known familial syndrome that has defined risk for thyroid cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with familial syndromes that are associated with thyroid cancer can be individually categorized based on syndrome risks for developing thyroid cancer. The clinician must also be knowledgeable in recognizing the possibility of an underlying familial syndrome when a patient presents with thyroid cancer.
BACKGROUND: Well-differentiated thyroid cancer accounts for 95% of thyroid malignancies, and 5% of these patients will have familial disease. This compares to 25% of patients with medullary thyroid cancer (MTC) having a familial form; however, this accounts for only 1% of all patients with thyroid cancer. Most cases of familial thyroid cancer are nonmedullary (NMFTC), and have been shown to be present in familial cancer syndromes such as familial adenomatous polyposis, Cowden syndrome, Carney complex, Pendred syndrome, and Werner syndrome. This review discusses the contemporary management of the patients with familial-syndrome-associated thyroid cancer based on their individual risks for developing thyroid cancer. SUMMARY: Most of the progress in the genetics of familial thyroid cancer has been in patients with MTC. The mutations in patients with isolated NMFTC have not been as well defined as in MTC. They are likely autosomal dominant with reduced penetrance. The patients with these familial syndromes most likely have a susceptibility gene that increases the risk of thyroid cancer. Most of the patients with a familial syndrome and NMFTC will have papillary thyroid carcinoma, suggesting that a specific gene for papillary thyroid carcinoma may also be present. In many cases, patients have a known familial syndrome that has defined risk for thyroid cancer. CONCLUSIONS:Patients with familial syndromes that are associated with thyroid cancer can be individually categorized based on syndrome risks for developing thyroid cancer. The clinician must also be knowledgeable in recognizing the possibility of an underlying familial syndrome when a patient presents with thyroid cancer.
Authors: Scott A Rivkees; Ernest L Mazzaferri; Frederik A Verburg; Christoph Reiners; Markus Luster; Christopher K Breuer; Catherine A Dinauer; Robert Udelsman Journal: Endocr Rev Date: 2011-08-31 Impact factor: 19.871
Authors: Giorgio Treglia; Carmelo Caldarella; Paola Castaldi; Barbara Muoio; Francesco Bertagna; Luca Giovanella Journal: Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2012-11-23
Authors: Bryan R Haugen; Erik K Alexander; Keith C Bible; Gerard M Doherty; Susan J Mandel; Yuri E Nikiforov; Furio Pacini; Gregory W Randolph; Anna M Sawka; Martin Schlumberger; Kathryn G Schuff; Steven I Sherman; Julie Ann Sosa; David L Steward; R Michael Tuttle; Leonard Wartofsky Journal: Thyroid Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 6.568
Authors: Geeta Lal; Megan Groff; James R Howe; Ronald J Weigel; Sonia L Sugg; Charles F Lynch Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2012-01-07 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Theodora Pappa; Sara Ahmadi; Athanasios Bikas; Sally Hwang; Alexandra Coleman; Isabel Lobon; Pingping Xiang; Matthew Kim; Ellen Marqusee; Danielle M Richman; Sara M Durfee; Elizabeth H Asch; Carol B Benson; Mary C Frates; Iñigo Landa; Erik K Alexander Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2022-06-16 Impact factor: 6.134
Authors: K J Johnson; S E Carozza; E J Chow; E E Fox; S Horel; C C McLaughlin; B A Mueller; S E Puumala; P Reynolds; J Von Behren; L G Spector Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2011-09-13 Impact factor: 7.640