Literature DB >> 20578852

A study on orthodontic bone-bonding anchorage.

Xianjv Xie1, Yuxing Bai, Ying Lv, Weiming Gao.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The study had two objectives: (1) to measure the maximum loading capacity of a new skeletal orthodontic anchorage, designated the "bone-bonding anchorage," and (2) to study its histological basis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 81 bone-bonding anchorages were fixed onto the surface of the tibia of 12 big-ear white rabbits with N-2-butyl cyanoacrylate. The 12 animals were divided into groups designated as the immediate, 2-week, 4-week, and 8-week after-surgery groups. The maximum loading capacity of each group was measured, and histological changes were observed.
RESULTS: The results indicate a tendency toward an initial decrease and then an increase in the maximum loading capacity of the bone-bonding anchorage. The mean value of the 8-week group reached 45.69 N, which can satisfy orthodontic clinical needs. Histologically, new bone formation was found around the base of the bone-bonding anchorage, which wrapped the base until it was bone-buried, creating the histological basis of the maximum loading capacity. In the experiment, the total failure rate of the bone-bonding anchorage was 13.6%, and no failure occurred in the immediate and 8-week groups.
CONCLUSION: The loading capacity of the bone-bonding anchorage is sufficient for orthodontic use, but whether or not it can be applied to clinical practice merits further study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20578852      PMCID: PMC8939008          DOI: 10.2319/120609-700.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  8 in total

1.  A prospective study of the risk factors associated with failure of mini-implants used for orthodontic anchorage.

Authors:  Shih-Jung Cheng; I-Yun Tseng; Jang-Jaer Lee; Sang-Heng Kok
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  Load-related implant reaction of mini-implants used for orthodontic anchorage.

Authors:  André Büchter; Dirk Wiechmann; Stefan Koerdt; Hans Peter Wiesmann; Josef Piffko; Ulrich Meyer
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.977

3.  Treatment of tripod fracture of zygomatic bone by N-2-butyl cyanoacrylate glue fixation, and its effects on the tissues.

Authors:  Burhan Dadaş; Seyhan Alkan; Memet Cifci; Tülay Başak
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2007-01-04       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Risks and complications of orthodontic miniscrews.

Authors:  Neal D Kravitz; Budi Kusnoto
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.650

5.  Butyl-2-cyanoacrylate fixation of mandibular osteotomies.

Authors:  M A Shermak; L Wong; N Inoue; E Y Chao; P N Manson
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.730

6.  A new device for absolute anchorage for orthodontics.

Authors:  M S Block; D R Hoffman
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 2.650

7.  A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw.

Authors:  R Adell; U Lekholm; B Rockler; P I Brånemark
Journal:  Int J Oral Surg       Date:  1981-12

8.  Clinical suitability of titanium microscrews for orthodontic anchorage-preliminary experiences.

Authors:  Ulrike Fritz; Andreas Ehmer; Peter Diedrich
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 1.938

  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  Mechanical and histological evaluation of a titanium device for orthodontic anchorage, placed with or without cyanoacrylate adhesive.

Authors:  Anderson Antonio Mamede; Elizabeth Ferreira Martinez; Roberta Tarkany Basting
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2019-08-01
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.