Literature DB >> 20578680

Evaluation of the identification power of RPLC analyses in the screening for drug compounds.

Melanie Dumarey1, Yvan Vander Heyden, Sarah C Rutan.   

Abstract

The identification of drugs of abuse is an important issue in forensic science. The main goal is to trace and identify as many drugs as possible in the shortest possible time preferably with a simple analysis method. One possibility is to screen samples using a Liquid Chromatography-Diode Array Detection (LC-DAD) system. However, when simultaneously performing another analysis on a chromatographic column exhibiting selectivity differences from the first one, that is, orthogonal or dissimilar columns, a greater number of drugs can be possibly identified without investing a lot of extra time or money. The primary difficulty is then selecting the most appropriate columns. In this paper, it is demonstrated that selecting the most dissimilar columns based on measures such as correlation or Snyder's F(s) value is not optimal, because these measures do not take into account the identification power of the individual systems. This implies that a large number of drugs may not necessarily be identified on the systems selected using these criteria. Therefore, three other measures are tested to evaluate the identification power obtained by parallel screening on two columns or by comprehensive two-dimensional LC (LC x LC). The simplest approach is counting the number of compounds separable with a difference in retention time greater than a predefined critical value. However, this measure does not reflect the coelution pattern of the unidentified drugs nor the separation degree of all compounds. The second tested measure, information, enables differentiation between systems identifying the same number of compounds but resulting in a different coelution pattern. Multivariate selectivity, the third tested parameter, takes into account the degree of separation of all compounds and has the advantage that it reflects the gain in identification power achieved by introducing DAD data. All three proposed measures also enable evaluation of whether the corresponding LC x LC method will result in a greater identification power.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20578680      PMCID: PMC2914508          DOI: 10.1021/ac1006415

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Chem        ISSN: 0003-2700            Impact factor:   6.986


  28 in total

Review 1.  Position of chromatographic techniques in screening for detection of drugs or poisons in clinical and forensic toxicology and/or doping control.

Authors:  Hans H Maurer
Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 2.  The hydrophobic-subtraction model of reversed-phase column selectivity.

Authors:  L R Snyder; J W Dolan; P W Carr
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2004-12-10       Impact factor: 4.759

3.  Selection of orthogonal reversed-phase HPLC systems by univariate and auto-associative multivariate regression trees.

Authors:  R Put; E Van Gyseghem; D Coomans; Y Vander Heyden
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2005-11-25       Impact factor: 4.759

4.  Multivariate selectivity as a metric for evaluating comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography-time-of-flight mass spectrometry subjected to chemometric peak deconvolution.

Authors:  Amanda E Sinha; Janiece L Hope; Bryan J Prazen; Carlos G Fraga; Erik J Nilsson; Robert E Synovec
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2004-11-12       Impact factor: 4.759

5.  Orthogonality of separation in two-dimensional liquid chromatography.

Authors:  Martin Gilar; Petra Olivova; Amy E Daly; John C Gebler
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2005-10-01       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 6.  Column selectivity for two-dimensional liquid chromatography.

Authors:  Pavel Jandera
Journal:  J Sep Sci       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.645

7.  Effect of first-dimension undersampling on effective peak capacity in comprehensive two-dimensional separations.

Authors:  Joe M Davis; Dwight R Stoll; Peter W Carr
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2007-12-13       Impact factor: 6.986

8.  Identification power of a standardized HPLC-DAD system for systematic toxicological analysis.

Authors:  R D Maier; M Bogusz
Journal:  J Anal Toxicol       Date:  1995 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.367

9.  System evaluation and substance identification in systematic toxicological analysis by the mean list length approach.

Authors:  P G Schepers; J P Franke; R A de Zeeuw
Journal:  J Anal Toxicol       Date:  1983 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.367

10.  Identification of porphyrin modified photosensitizer porfimer sodium and its precursors by high performance liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry.

Authors:  G Stoev; Al Stoyanov; M Shopova; Kr Dachev
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2007-01-26       Impact factor: 4.759

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.