Literature DB >> 20577746

Stapled anastomosis for anterior resection is safe even after previous stapled haemorrhoidectomy--a report of five cases.

Wan-Pei Fu1, Hak-Mien Quah, Choong-Leong Tang, Boon-Swee Ooi, Kong-Weng Eu.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Stapled haemorrhoidectomy has become popular for the treatment of symptomatic bleeding or prolapsing piles. There are concerns about the safety of another stapled low colorectal anastomosis after rectal resection if a patient who has had previous stapled haemorrhoidectomy subsequently develops colorectal neoplasia requiring an anterior resection.
METHODS: A retrospective review of patients who underwent stapled haemorrhoidectomy and subsequently had anterior resection from 1999 to 2008 was performed.
RESULTS: Five patients (all male) were found to have distal sigmoid or rectal tumours on surveillance colonoscopy after stapled haemorrhoidectomy. Median age was 65 years (range 58-71). All underwent anterior resection with stapled end-to-end colorectal anastomosis at median of 29 months (range 18-60 months) after the initial stapled haemorrhoidectomy. Median anastomotic height was 12 cm (range 1-12 cm). A defunctioning ileostomy was created for three out of five patients. All the colorectal anastomoses healed uneventfully.
CONCLUSIONS: Stapled colorectal anastomosis may be safely performed after previous stapled haemorrhoidectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20577746     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-010-0994-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  9 in total

Review 1.  Modified Longo's hemorrhoidectomy.

Authors:  D Lloyd; K S Ho; F Seow-Choen
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.585

2.  Stapled haemorrhoidectomy or Longo's procedure? Two totally different concepts.

Authors:  K W Eu; J H Lai
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.858

3.  Experience of 3711 stapled haemorrhoidectomy operations.

Authors:  K-H Ng; K-S Ho; B-S Ooi; C-L Tang; K-W Eu
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Long-term outcome of a multicentre randomized clinical trial of stapled haemorrhoidopexy versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy.

Authors:  E Ganio; D F Altomare; G Milito; F Gabrielli; S Canuti
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 5.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing stapled haemorrhoidopexy with conventional haemorrhoidectomy.

Authors:  W-J Shao; G-C H Li; Z H-K Zhang; B-L Yang; G-D Sun; Y-Q Chen
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Modified stapled haemorrhoidectomy: a suggested improved technique.

Authors:  Kheng-Hong Ng; Min-Hoe Chew; Kong-Weng Eu
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 1.872

7.  Stapled hemorrhoidectomy--cost and effectiveness. Randomized, controlled trial including incontinence scoring, anorectal manometry, and endoanal ultrasound assessments at up to three months.

Authors:  Y H Ho; W K Cheong; C Tsang; J Ho; K W Eu; C L Tang; F Seow-Choen
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  A defunctioning ileostomy does not prevent clinical anastomotic leak after a low anterior resection: a prospective, comparative study.

Authors:  N Y Wong; K W Eu
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.585

9.  Stapling procedure for haemorrhoids versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  B J Mehigan; J R Monson; J E Hartley
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-03-04       Impact factor: 79.321

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.