Literature DB >> 20577218

The addition of plerixafor is safe and allows adequate PBSC collection in multiple myeloma and lymphoma patients poor mobilizers after chemotherapy and G-CSF.

A D'Addio1, A Curti, N Worel, K Douglas, M R Motta, S Rizzi, E Dan, S Taioli, V Giudice, H Agis, G Kopetzky, R Soutar, B Casadei, M Baccarani, R M Lemoli.   

Abstract

We report 13 multiple myeloma (MM) or lymphoma patients who were failing PBSC mobilization after disease-specific chemotherapy and granulocyte-CSF (G-CSF), and received plerixafor to successfully collect PBSCs. Patients were considered poor mobilizers when the concentration of PB CD34(+) cells was always lower than 10 cells/μL, during the recovery phase after chemotherapy and/or were predicted to have inadequate PBSC collection to proceed to autologous transplantation. Plerixafor (0.24 mg/kg) was administered subcutaneously for up to three consecutive days, while continuing G-CSF, 10-11 h before the planned leukapheresis. Plerixafor administration was safe and no significant adverse events were recorded. We observed a 4.7 median fold-increase in the number of circulating CD34(+) cells after plerixafor as compared with baseline CD34(+) cell concentration (from a median of 6.2 (range 1-12) to 21.5 (range 9-88) cells/μL). All patients collected >2 × 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg in 1-3 leukaphereses. In all, 5/13 patients have already undergone autograft with plerixafor-mobilized PBSCs, showing a rapid and durable hematological recovery. Our results suggest that the pre-emptive addition of plerixafor to G-CSF after chemotherapy is safe and may allow the rescue of lymphoma and MM patients, who need autologous transplantation but are failing PBSC mobilization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20577218     DOI: 10.1038/bmt.2010.128

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant        ISSN: 0268-3369            Impact factor:   5.483


  22 in total

1.  The effective use of plerixafor as a real-time rescue strategy for patients poorly mobilizing autologous CD34(+) cells.

Authors:  Ajay K Gopal; Mehdi Karami; JoAl Mayor; Mylene Macebeo; Michael Linenberger; William I Bensinger; Leona Holmberg
Journal:  J Clin Apher       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 2.821

2.  Upfront plerixafor plus G-CSF versus cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF for stem cell mobilization in multiple myeloma: efficacy and cost analysis study.

Authors:  S Afifi; N G Adel; S Devlin; E Duck; J Vanak; H Landau; D J Chung; N Lendvai; A Lesokhin; N Korde; L Reich; O Landgren; S Giralt; H Hassoun
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 5.483

Review 3.  Autologous haematopoietic stem cell mobilisation in multiple myeloma and lymphoma patients: a position statement from the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.

Authors:  M Mohty; K Hübel; N Kröger; M Aljurf; J Apperley; G W Basak; A Bazarbachi; K Douglas; I Gabriel; L Garderet; C Geraldes; O Jaksic; M W Kattan; Z Koristek; F Lanza; R M Lemoli; L Mendeleeva; G Mikala; N Mikhailova; A Nagler; H C Schouten; D Selleslag; S Suciu; A Sureda; N Worel; P Wuchter; C Chabannon; R F Duarte
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 5.483

4.  The timing of plerixafor addition to G-Csf and chemotherapy affects immunological recovery after autologous stem cell transplant in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Antonio Curti; Roberto M Lemoli; Giulia Tolomelli; Katia Mancuso; Paola Tacchetti; Francesca Patriarca; Monica Galli; Lucia Pantani; Beatrice Zannetti; Maria Rosa Motta; Simonetta Rizzi; Elisa Dan; Barbara Sinigaglia; Valeria Giudice; Andrea Olmo; Mario Arpinati; Gabriella Chirumbolo; Renato Fanin; Russell E Lewis; Laura Paris; Francesca Bonifazi; Michele Cavo
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 5.483

5.  Plerixafor 'on demand': results of a strategy based on peripheral blood CD34+ cells in lymphoma patients at first or subsequent mobilization with chemotherapy+G-CSF.

Authors:  L Farina; A Guidetti; F Spina; L Roncari; P Longoni; F Ravagnani; C Carlo-Stella; P Corradini
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 5.483

6.  The nucleotide sugar UDP-glucose mobilizes long-term repopulating primitive hematopoietic cells.

Authors:  Sungho Kook; Joonseok Cho; Sean Bong Lee; Byeong-Chel Lee
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 14.808

7.  Early measurement of CD34+ cells in peripheral blood after cyclophosphamide and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor treatment predicts later CD34+ mobilisation failure and is a possible criterion for guiding "on demand" use of plerixafor.

Authors:  Giuseppe Milone; Giovanni Tripepi; Massimo Martino; Flavia Ancora; Benedetta Bartolozzi; Andrea Spadaro; Chiara Nozzoli; Alessia La Fauci; Irene Amico; Salvatore Leotta; Massimo Poidomani; Giuseppe Irrera; Pasquale Iacopino; Riccardo Saccardi; Stefano Guidi; Alberto Bosi
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 3.443

8.  Effectiveness of etoposide chemomobilization in lymphoma patients undergoing auto-SCT.

Authors:  W A Wood; J Whitley; R Goyal; P M Brown; A Sharf; R Irons; K V Rao; A Essenmacher; J S Serody; J M Coghill; P M Armistead; S Sarantopoulos; D A Gabriel; T C Shea
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 5.483

9.  An effective mobilization strategy for lymphoma patients after failed upfront mobilization with plerixafor.

Authors:  B M Haverkos; A McBride; L O'Donnell; D Scholl; B Whittaker; S Vasu; S Penza; L A Andritsos; S M Devine; S M Jaglowski
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 5.483

Review 10.  Current clinical indications for plerixafor.

Authors:  Stefan Fruehauf
Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 3.747

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.