BACKGROUND: Granulocyte antibodies have been implicated in allo- and autoimmune neutropenia and in transfusion reactions. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Fifty-one sera from suspected alloimmune neutropenia or transfusion-related acute lung injury (TRALI) and 40 sera from suspected autoimmune neutropenia were tested for granulocyte antibodies using LABScreen MULTI (One Lambda, Inc.), compared with classical tests (flow cytometry [FC] and granulocyte agglutination [GAT] followed by monoclonal antibody-specific immobilization of granulocyte antigens [MAIGA]). RESULTS: In alloimmune situations, 48 sera were concordant (94%), two sera positive for HNA with LABScreen MULTI were negative by FC/GAT and/or MAIGA, and one serum sample negative for HNA with LABScreen MULTI was positive by classical tests. In autoimmune neutropenia, 30 sera were concordant (75%), four sera positive for HNA with LABScreen MULTI were negative by FC/GAT and/or MAIGA, and six sera negative for HNA with LABScreen MULTI were positive by FC/GAT and/or MAIGA. For detection of autoantibodies, the LABScreen MULTI was less concordant. However, with the exception of one case, the discrepancies were observed in sera that did not show a clear specificity. CONCLUSIONS: LABScreen MULTI correlated well with our classical methods for HNA-1 and HNA-2a antibody screening. It can be used for screening blood donors or patients suspected of TRALI, but GAT is still needed for HNA-3a antibody screening.
BACKGROUND: Granulocyte antibodies have been implicated in allo- and autoimmune neutropenia and in transfusion reactions. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Fifty-one sera from suspected alloimmune neutropenia or transfusion-related acute lung injury (TRALI) and 40 sera from suspected autoimmune neutropenia were tested for granulocyte antibodies using LABScreen MULTI (One Lambda, Inc.), compared with classical tests (flow cytometry [FC] and granulocyte agglutination [GAT] followed by monoclonal antibody-specific immobilization of granulocyte antigens [MAIGA]). RESULTS: In alloimmune situations, 48 sera were concordant (94%), two sera positive for HNA with LABScreen MULTI were negative by FC/GAT and/or MAIGA, and one serum sample negative for HNA with LABScreen MULTI was positive by classical tests. In autoimmune neutropenia, 30 sera were concordant (75%), four sera positive for HNA with LABScreen MULTI were negative by FC/GAT and/or MAIGA, and six sera negative for HNA with LABScreen MULTI were positive by FC/GAT and/or MAIGA. For detection of autoantibodies, the LABScreen MULTI was less concordant. However, with the exception of one case, the discrepancies were observed in sera that did not show a clear specificity. CONCLUSIONS: LABScreen MULTI correlated well with our classical methods for HNA-1 and HNA-2a antibody screening. It can be used for screening blood donors or patients suspected of TRALI, but GAT is still needed for HNA-3a antibody screening.