Literature DB >> 20574901

Computational systems biology and dose-response modeling in relation to new directions in toxicity testing.

Qiang Zhang1, Sudin Bhattacharya, Melvin E Andersen, Rory B Conolly.   

Abstract

The new paradigm envisioned for toxicity testing in the 21st century advocates shifting from the current animal-based testing process to a combination of in vitro cell-based studies, high-throughput techniques, and in silico modeling. A strategic component of the vision is the adoption of the systems biology approach to acquire, analyze, and interpret toxicity pathway data. As key toxicity pathways are identified and their wiring details elucidated using traditional and high-throughput techniques, there is a pressing need to understand their qualitative and quantitative behaviors in response to perturbation by both physiological signals and exogenous stressors. The complexity of these molecular networks makes the task of understanding cellular responses merely by human intuition challenging, if not impossible. This process can be aided by mathematical modeling and computer simulation of the networks and their dynamic behaviors. A number of theoretical frameworks were developed in the last century for understanding dynamical systems in science and engineering disciplines. These frameworks, which include metabolic control analysis, biochemical systems theory, nonlinear dynamics, and control theory, can greatly facilitate the process of organizing, analyzing, and understanding toxicity pathways. Such analysis will require a comprehensive examination of the dynamic properties of "network motifs"--the basic building blocks of molecular circuits. Network motifs like feedback and feedforward loops appear repeatedly in various molecular circuits across cell types and enable vital cellular functions like homeostasis, all-or-none response, memory, and biological rhythm. These functional motifs and associated qualitative and quantitative properties are the predominant source of nonlinearities observed in cellular dose response data. Complex response behaviors can arise from toxicity pathways built upon combinations of network motifs. While the field of computational cell biology has advanced rapidly with increasing availability of new data and powerful simulation techniques, a quantitative orientation is still lacking in life sciences education to make efficient use of these new tools to implement the new toxicity testing paradigm. A revamped undergraduate curriculum in the biological sciences including compulsory courses in mathematics and analysis of dynamical systems is required to address this gap. In parallel, dissemination of computational systems biology techniques and other analytical tools among practicing toxicologists and risk assessment professionals will help accelerate implementation of the new toxicity testing vision.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20574901     DOI: 10.1080/10937404.2010.483943

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev        ISSN: 1093-7404            Impact factor:   6.393


  15 in total

Review 1.  Contributions of DNA repair and damage response pathways to the non-linear genotoxic responses of alkylating agents.

Authors:  Joanna Klapacz; Lynn H Pottenger; Bevin P Engelward; Christopher D Heinen; George E Johnson; Rebecca A Clewell; Paul L Carmichael; Yeyejide Adeleye; Melvin E Andersen
Journal:  Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 5.657

2.  Building shared experience to advance practical application of pathway-based toxicology: liver toxicity mode-of-action.

Authors:  Catherine Willett; Jessica Caverly Rae; Katy O Goyak; Gary Minsavage; Carl Westmoreland; Melvin Andersen; Mark Avigan; Daniel Duché; Georgina Harris; Thomas Hartung; Hartmut Jaeschke; Andre Kleensang; Brigitte Landesmann; Suzanne Martos; Marilyn Matevia; Colleen Toole; Andrew Rowan; Terry Schultz; Jennifer Seed; John Senior; Imran Shah; Kalyanasundaram Subramanian; Mathieu Vinken; Paul Watkins
Journal:  ALTEX       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 6.043

3.  In Silico Models for Ecotoxicity of Pharmaceuticals.

Authors:  Kunal Roy; Supratik Kar
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2016

Review 4.  Physiologically based pharmacokinetic models: integration of in silico approaches with micro cell culture analogues.

Authors:  A Chen; M L Yarmush; T Maguire
Journal:  Curr Drug Metab       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.731

Review 5.  Toxicity testing in the 21 century: defining new risk assessment approaches based on perturbation of intracellular toxicity pathways.

Authors:  Sudin Bhattacharya; Qiang Zhang; Paul L Carmichael; Kim Boekelheide; Melvin E Andersen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-06-20       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Systems Biology and Biomarkers of Early Effects for Occupational Exposure Limit Setting.

Authors:  D Gayle DeBord; Lyle Burgoon; Stephen W Edwards; Lynne T Haber; M Helen Kanitz; Eileen Kuempel; Russell S Thomas; Berran Yucesoy
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.155

Review 7.  Molecular signaling network motifs provide a mechanistic basis for cellular threshold responses.

Authors:  Qiang Zhang; Sudin Bhattacharya; Rory B Conolly; Harvey J Clewell; Norbert E Kaminski; Melvin E Andersen
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 9.031

8.  Modeling drug- and chemical-induced hepatotoxicity with systems biology approaches.

Authors:  Sudin Bhattacharya; Lisl K M Shoda; Qiang Zhang; Courtney G Woods; Brett A Howell; Scott Q Siler; Jeffrey L Woodhead; Yuching Yang; Patrick McMullen; Paul B Watkins; Melvin E Andersen
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 4.566

9.  A framework for the next generation of risk science.

Authors:  Daniel Krewski; Margit Westphal; Melvin E Andersen; Gregory M Paoli; Weihsueh A Chiu; Mustafa Al-Zoughool; Maxine C Croteau; Lyle D Burgoon; Ila Cote
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Profiling dose-dependent activation of p53-mediated signaling pathways by chemicals with distinct mechanisms of DNA damage.

Authors:  Rebecca A Clewell; Bin Sun; Yeyejide Adeleye; Paul Carmichael; Alina Efremenko; Patrick D McMullen; Salil Pendse; O J Trask; Andy White; Melvin E Andersen
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 4.849

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.