Literature DB >> 20574881

Cancer information sources used by patients to inform and influence treatment decisions.

Matthew C Walsh1, Amy Trentham-Dietz, Tracy A Schroepfer, Douglas J Reding, Bruce Campbell, Mary L Foote, Stephanie Kaufman, Morgan Barrett, Patrick L Remington, James F Cleary.   

Abstract

Previous research has indicated that treatment staff often underestimate the informational needs of cancer patients. In this study, the authors determined the total number of information sources obtained and used to influence treatment decisions, and the clinical and demographic factors associated with the use of specific sources of information in cancer patients. Participants were identified by the statewide cancer registry and diagnosed in 2004 with breast, colorectal, lung, or prostate cancer. A self-administered mailed questionnaire elicited cancer treatments, demographics, and information sources used to make treatment decisions. Of those surveyed, 1,784 (66%) participated and responded to all questions regarding information use. Over 69% of study participants reported obtaining information from a source other than the treatment staff. Significant predictors of using additional information sources included younger age, higher income, higher education, complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use, and reporting shared decision making (all p values <.01). Participants with a college degree were more likely to use the Internet (OR 3.7; 95% CI 1.5-9.0) and scientific research reports (OR 3.3; 95% CI 1.6-6.9) to influence treatment decisions compared with those without a high school degree. Support group use to influence treatment decisions was not associated with socioeconomic variables but did vary by cancer type and CAM use. The sources of information study participants obtained and used to influence treatment decisions varied strongly by socioeconomic and demographic variables. These findings provide a deeper understanding of the information needs of cancer patients and have implications for dissemination strategies that can minimize disparities in access to cancer information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20574881     DOI: 10.1080/10810731003753109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Commun        ISSN: 1081-0730


  40 in total

1.  Physical and emotional health information needs and preferences of long-term prostate cancer survivors.

Authors:  Eric S Zhou; Sharon L Bober; Larissa Nekhlyudov; Jim C Hu; Philip W Kantoff; Christopher J Recklitis
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2016-07-14

2.  Examining cultural factors that influence treatment decisions: a pilot study of Latino men with cancer.

Authors:  Iraida V Carrion; Frances R Nedjat-Haiem; David X Marquez
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 3.  Identifying Complementary and Alternative Medicine Usage Information from Internet Resources. A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Vivekanand Sharma; John H Holmes; Indra N Sarkar
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 2.176

4.  Validation and Assessment of a Technology Familiarity Score in Patients Attending a Symptomatic Breast Clinic.

Authors:  C O'Brien; J Kelly; E A Lehane; V Livingstone; B Cotter; A Butt; L Kelly; M A Corrigan
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Pediatric cancer and the internet: exploring the gap in doctor-parents communication.

Authors:  Martí Domínguez; Lucía Sapiña
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.037

6.  Influences of patient sociodemographics on cancer information received through the first 9 months of treatment.

Authors:  Anthony Molisani; Levent Dumenci; Robin K Matsuyama
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.037

7.  Does the number of cancer patients' close social ties affect cancer-related information seeking through communication efficacy? Testing a mediation model.

Authors:  Nehama Lewis; Lourdes S Martinez
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2014-03-27

8.  Aromatase inhibitors: The unexpected breast cancer treatment.

Authors:  Huibrie C Pieters; Emily Green; Miriam Sleven; Annette L Stanton
Journal:  J Geriatr Oncol       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 3.599

9.  Face-to-face vs. online peer support groups for prostate cancer: A cross-sectional comparison study.

Authors:  Johannes Huber; Tanja Muck; Philipp Maatz; Bastian Keck; Paul Enders; Imad Maatouk; Andreas Ihrig
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 4.442

Review 10.  Lung cancer screening.

Authors:  Antonio Gutierrez; Robert Suh; Fereidoun Abtin; Scott Genshaft; Kathleen Brown
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.513

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.