Literature DB >> 20574092

Distinguishing hypervascular pseudolesions of the liver from hypervascular hepatocellular carcinomas with gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging.

Utaroh Motosugi1, Tomoaki Ichikawa, Hironobu Sou, Katsuhiro Sano, Licht Tominaga, Ali Muhi, Tsutomu Araki.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To retrospectively determine findings at gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in hypervascular pseudolesions that were observed at computed tomography (CT) during hepatic arteriography, with special focus on distinguishing these pseudolesions from hypervascular hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The institute ethics committee deemed study approval unnecessary. The study population comprised 80 patients (55 men, 25 women) with chronic liver disease who underwent CT during hepatic arteriography and arterial portography, gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging, and follow-up dynamic contrast material-enhanced CT. The diagnosis of 104 pseudolesions and 123 HCCs was confirmed by means of histopathologic or multimodality evaluation. Two radiologists assessed the MR imaging findings of HCCs and pseudolesions in consensus, including the signal intensities (SIs) of the lesions on T2-weighted, diffusion-weighted (DW), and contrast-enhanced hepatocyte-phase images. The findings of nodular pseudolesions and HCCs were compared with the Fisher exact test. Additionally, the hepatocyte-phase SI ratio (ratio of lesion SI to liver SI) for HCCs and pseudolesions was compared by means of the Mann-Whitney U test.
RESULTS: There were 62 wedge-shaped, 32 nodular, and 10 linear pseudolesions. On gadoxetic acid-enhanced hepatocyte-phase MR images, 15% of pseudolesions (16 of 104) were hypointense compared with surrounding liver tissue. The mean hepatocyte-phase SI ratio of HCCs (0.65 +/- 0.14 [standard deviation]) was significantly lower (P < .01) than that of the nodular pseudolesions (0.95 +/- 0.11). The optimal cutoff value of hepatocyte-phase SI ratio for distinguishing between HCC and nodular pseudolesion was 0.84. No nodular pseudolesions were visible on DW images.
CONCLUSION: Gadoxetic acid-enhanced hepatocyte-phase MR imaging and DW imaging could be used to distinguish hypervascular pseudolesions from hypervascular HCCs; a hepatocyte-phase SI ratio below 0.84 and visibility on DW images were findings specific for HCCs rather than pseudolesions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20574092     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.10091885

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  57 in total

1.  Small (≤ 2 cm) hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic liver disease: comparison of gadoxetic acid-enhanced 3.0 T MRI and multiphasic 64-multirow detector CT.

Authors:  J Hwang; S H Kim; M W Lee; J Y Lee
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Differentiation of early hepatocellular carcinoma from benign hepatocellular nodules on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI.

Authors:  H Rhee; M-J Kim; M-S Park; K A Kim
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 3.  Solid liver masses: approach to management from the standpoint of a radiologist.

Authors:  Robert Garrett
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2013-12

Review 4.  Appearance of hepatocellular carcinoma on gadoxetic acid-enhanced hepato-biliary phase MR imaging: a systematic review.

Authors:  Paola Erra; Marta Puglia; Alfonso Ragozzino; Simone Maurea; Raffaele Liuzzi; Giuseppe Sabino; Luigi Barbuto; Alberto Cuocolo; Massimo Imbriaco
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 5.  Assessing locoregional treatment response to Hepatocellular Carcinoma: comparison of hepatobiliary contrast agents to extracellular contrast agents.

Authors:  Anum Aslam; Amita Kamath; Bradley Spieler; Mark Maschiocchi; Carl F Sabottke; Victoria Chernyak; Sara C Lewis
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2021-04-15

Review 6.  Therapeutic response assessment of RFA for HCC: contrast-enhanced US, CT and MRI.

Authors:  Yasunori Minami; Naoshi Nishida; Masatoshi Kudo
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 7.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the cirrhotic liver: An update.

Authors:  Agnes Watanabe; Miguel Ramalho; Mamdoh AlObaidy; Hye Jin Kim; Fernanda G Velloni; Richard C Semelka
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2015-03-27

8.  Performance of gadoxetic acid MRI and diffusion-weighted imaging for the diagnosis of early recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Jordi Rimola; Alejandro Forner; Víctor Sapena; Neus Llarch; Anna Darnell; Alba Díaz; Angeles García-Criado; Lluís Bianchi; Ramon Vilana; Álvaro Díaz-González; Carmen Ayuso; Jordi Bruix; María Reig
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 9.  Multiparametric MR Imaging in Abdominal Malignancies.

Authors:  Antonio Luna; Shivani Pahwa; Claudio Bonini; Lidia Alcalá-Mata; Katherine L Wright; Vikas Gulani
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.266

10.  Comparison of hepatocellular carcinoma conspicuity on hepatobiliary phase images with gadoxetate disodium vs. delayed phase images with extracellular cellular contrast agent.

Authors:  So Yeon Kim; En-Haw Wu; Seong Ho Park; Z Jane Wang; Thomas A Hope; Judy Yee; Li-Qin Zhao; Wei-Chou Chang; Benjamin M Yeh
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2016-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.