Literature DB >> 16034981

Interventions to improve outpatient referrals from primary care to secondary care.

J M Grimshaw1, R A G Winkens, L Shirran, C Cunningham, A Mayhew, R Thomas, C Fraser.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The primary care specialist interface is a key organisational feature of many health care systems. Patients are referred to specialist care when investigation or therapeutic options are exhausted in primary care and more specialised care is needed. Referral has considerable implications for patients, the health care system and health care costs. There is considerable evidence that the referral processes can be improved.
OBJECTIVES: To estimate the effectiveness and efficiency of interventions to change outpatient referral rates or improve outpatient referral appropriateness. SEARCH STRATEGY: We conducted electronic searches of the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) group specialised register (developed through extensive searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Healthstar and the Cochrane Library) (February 2002) and the National Research Register. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials, controlled clinical trials, controlled before and after studies and interrupted time series of interventions to change or improve outpatient referrals. Participants were primary care physicians. The outcomes were objectively measured provider performance or health outcomes. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed study quality. MAIN
RESULTS: Seventeen studies involving 23 separate comparisons were included. Nine studies (14 comparisons) evaluated professional educational interventions. Ineffective strategies included: passive dissemination of local referral guidelines (two studies), feedback of referral rates (one study) and discussion with an independent medical adviser (one study). Generally effective strategies included dissemination of guidelines with structured referral sheets (four out of five studies) and involvement of consultants in educational activities (two out of three studies). Three studies evaluated organisational interventions (patient management by family physicians compared to general internists, attachment of a physiotherapist to general practices and requiring a second 'in-house' opinion prior to referral), all of which were effective. Five studies (six comparisons) evaluated financial interventions. Two studies evaluating change from a capitation based to mixed capitation and fee-for-service system and from a fee-for-service to a capitation based system (with an element of risk sharing for secondary care services) observed a reduction in referral rates. Modest reductions in referral rates of uncertain significance were observed following the introduction of the general practice fundholding scheme in the United Kingdom (UK). One study evaluating the effect of providing access to private specialists demonstrated an increase in the proportion of patients referred to specialist services but no overall effect on referral rates. AUTHORS'
CONCLUSIONS: There are a limited number of rigorous evaluations to base policy on. Active local educational interventions involving secondary care specialists and structured referral sheets are the only interventions shown to impact on referral rates based on current evidence. The effects of 'in-house' second opinion and other intermediate primary care based alternatives to outpatient referral appear promising.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16034981     DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005471

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  37 in total

1.  Follow-up actions on electronic referral communication in a multispecialty outpatient setting.

Authors:  Hardeep Singh; Adol Esquivel; Dean F Sittig; Daniel Murphy; Himabindu Kadiyala; Rachel Schiesser; Donna Espadas; Laura A Petersen
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 2.  Referral management centres: promising innovations or Trojan horses?

Authors:  Myfanwy Davies; Glyn Elwyn
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-04-08

Review 3.  Cardiovascular health disparities: a systematic review of health care interventions.

Authors:  Andrew M Davis; Lisa M Vinci; Tochi M Okwuosa; Ayana R Chase; Elbert S Huang
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.929

Review 4.  The need for knowledge translation in chronic pain.

Authors:  James L Henry
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2008 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.037

5.  Limited options: a report on GP access to services.

Authors:  A Ní Shúilleabháin; M O'Kelly; F O'Kelly; T O'Dowd
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 1.568

6.  Characteristics of general practices associated with numbers of elective admissions.

Authors:  Mitum Chauhan; M John Bankart; Alexander Labeit; Richard Baker
Journal:  J Public Health (Oxf)       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 2.341

7.  General practitioners' evaluation of community psychiatric services: responsiveness to change of the General Practitioner Experiences Questionnaire (GPEQ).

Authors:  Oyvind A Bjertnaes; Arjan Nieland; Elisabeth Damerell; Andrew Garratt
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-04-30       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  Agreement between structured checklists and Medicaid claims for preventive dental visits in primary care medical offices.

Authors:  Bhavna T Pahel; R Gary Rozier; Sally C Stearns
Journal:  Health Informatics J       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.681

9.  The impact of social networks on knowledge transfer in long-term care facilities: Protocol for a study.

Authors:  Anne E Sales; Carole A Estabrooks; Thomas W Valente
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 7.327

10.  Update on the treatment of peripheral arthritis in psoriatic arthritis.

Authors:  Enrique R Soriano; Javier Rosa
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 4.592

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.