Literature DB >> 20572011

Comparison of reprogramming efficiency between transduction of reprogramming factors, cell-cell fusion, and cytoplast fusion.

Kouichi Hasegawa1, Peilin Zhang, Zong Wei, Jordan E Pomeroy, Wange Lu, Martin F Pera.   

Abstract

Reprogramming human somatic cells into pluripotent cells opens up new possibilities for transplantation therapy, the study of disease, and drug screening. In addition to somatic cell nuclear transfer, several approaches to reprogramming human cells have been reported: transduction of defined transcription factors to generate induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC), human embryonic stem cell (hESC)-somatic cell fusion, and hESC cytoplast-somatic cell fusion or exposure to extracts of hESC. Here, we optimized techniques for hESC-human fibroblast fusion and enucleation and cytoplast fusion, and then compared the reprogramming efficiency between iPSC generation, cell-fusion and cytoplast-fusion. When compared with iPSC, hESC-fusion provided much faster and efficient reprogramming of somatic cells. The reprogramming required more than 4 weeks and the efficiency was less than 0.001% in iPSC generation, and it was less than 10 days and more than 0.005% in hESC-fusion. In addition, fusion yielded almost no partially reprogrammed cell colonies. However, the fused cells were tetraploid or aneuploid. hESC cytoplast fusion could initiate reprogramming but was never able to complete reprogramming. These data indicate that in cell fusion, as in nuclear transfer, reprogramming through direct introduction of a somatic nucleus into the environment of a pluripotent cell provides relatively efficient reprogramming. The findings also suggest that the nucleus of the host pluripotent cell may contain components that accelerate the reprogramming process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20572011     DOI: 10.1002/stem.466

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stem Cells        ISSN: 1066-5099            Impact factor:   6.277


  12 in total

Review 1.  Regenerative chemical biology: current challenges and future potential.

Authors:  Ada Ao; Jijun Hao; Charles C Hong
Journal:  Chem Biol       Date:  2011-04-22

Review 2.  Pluripotency and cellular reprogramming: facts, hypotheses, unresolved issues.

Authors:  Jacob H Hanna; Krishanu Saha; Rudolf Jaenisch
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 3.  Small molecules, big roles -- the chemical manipulation of stem cell fate and somatic cell reprogramming.

Authors:  Yu Zhang; Wenlin Li; Timothy Laurent; Sheng Ding
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 5.285

4.  Generation of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells from Frozen Buffy Coats using Non-integrating Episomal Plasmids.

Authors:  Viviana Meraviglia; Alessandra Zanon; Alexandros A Lavdas; Christine Schwienbacher; Rosamaria Silipigni; Marina Di Segni; Huei-Sheng Vincent Chen; Peter P Pramstaller; Andrew A Hicks; Alessandra Rossini
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 5.  Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) as model to study inherited defects of neurotransmission in inborn errors of metabolism.

Authors:  Sabine Jung-Klawitter; Thomas Opladen
Journal:  J Inherit Metab Dis       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 4.982

6.  Cell fusion enhances mesendodermal differentiation of human induced pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Jie Qin; Stephanie Sontag; Qiong Lin; Saskia Mitzka; Isabelle Leisten; Rebekka K Schneider; Xiaoying Wang; Anna Jauch; Michael Peitz; Oliver Brüstle; Wolfgang Wagner; Robert Chunhua Zhao; Martin Zenke
Journal:  Stem Cells Dev       Date:  2014-08-11       Impact factor: 3.272

7.  Reprogramming somatic cells by fusion with embryonic stem cells does not cause silencing of the Dlk1-Dio3 region in mice.

Authors:  Nariman R Battulin; Anna A Khabarova; Ul'yana A Boyarskikh; Aleksey G Menzorov; Maxim L Filipenko; Oleg L Serov
Journal:  World J Stem Cells       Date:  2012-08-26       Impact factor: 5.326

8.  Wnt signaling orchestration with a small molecule DYRK inhibitor provides long-term xeno-free human pluripotent cell expansion.

Authors:  Kouichi Hasegawa; Shin-ya Yasuda; Jia-Ling Teo; Cu Nguyen; Michael McMillan; Chih-Lin Hsieh; Hirofumi Suemori; Norio Nakatsuji; Masashi Yamamoto; Tomoyuki Miyabayashi; Carolyn Lutzko; Martin F Pera; Michael Kahn
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 6.940

9.  Residual expression of the reprogramming factors prevents differentiation of iPSC generated from human fibroblasts and cord blood CD34+ progenitors.

Authors:  Verónica Ramos-Mejía; Rosa Montes; Clara Bueno; Verónica Ayllón; Pedro J Real; René Rodríguez; Pablo Menendez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Reprogramming and development in nuclear transfer embryos and in interspecific systems.

Authors:  Patrick Narbonne; Kei Miyamoto; J B Gurdon
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 5.578

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.