Literature DB >> 20571941

Ten-year experiences on initial genetic examination in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in Hungary (1993-2002). Technical approaches and clinical implementation.

Eva Olah1, Erzsebet Balogh, Laszlo Pajor, Zsuzsanna Jakab.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: A nationwide study was started in 1993 to provide genetic diagnosis for all newly diagnosed childhood ALL cases in Hungary using cytogenetic examination, DNA-index determination, FISH (aneuploidy, ABL/BCR, TEL/AML1) and molecular genetic tests (ABL/BCR, MLL/AF4, TEL/AML1). Aim of the study was to assess the usefulness of different genetic methods, to study the frequency of various aberrations and their prognostic significance. Results were synthesized for genetic subgrouping of patients. To assess the prognostic value of genetic aberrations overall and event-free survival of genetic subgroups were compared using Kaplan-Meier method. Prognostic role of aberrations was investigated by multivariate analysis (Cox's regression) as well in comparison with other factors (age, sex, major congenital abnormalities, initial WBC, therapy, immunophenotype). Five hundred eighty-eight ALL cases were diagnosed between 1993-2002. Cytogenetic examination was performed in 537 (91%) (success rate 73%), DNA-index in 265 (45%), FISH in 74 (13%), TEL/AML1 RT-PCR in 219 (37%) cases producing genetic diagnosis in 457 patients (78%). Proportion of subgroups with good prognosis in prae-B-cell ALL was lower than expected: hyperdiploidB 18% (73/400), TEL/AML1+ 9% (36/400). Univariate analysis showed significantly better 5-year EFS in TEL/AML1+ (82%) and hyperdiploidB cases (78%) than in tetraploid (44%) or pseudodiploid (52%) subgroups. By multivariate analysis main negative prognostic factors were: congenital abnormalities, high WBC, delay in therapy, specific translocations.
CONCLUSION: Complementary use of each of genetic methods used is necessary for reliable genetic diagnosis according to the algorithm presented. Specific genetic alterations proved to be of prognostic significance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20571941     DOI: 10.1007/s12253-010-9286-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res        ISSN: 1219-4956            Impact factor:   3.201


  33 in total

1.  Cytogenetic and FISH studies of a single center consecutive series of 152 childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemias.

Authors:  P Andreasson; M Höglund; A N Békássy; S Garwicz; J Heldrup; F Mitelman; B Johansson
Journal:  Eur J Haematol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.997

Review 2.  Cytogenetic abnormalities in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia correlates with clinical features and treatment outcome.

Authors:  C H Pui; W M Crist
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  1992-07

3.  Curing children of leukemia.

Authors:  D Pinkel
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1987-05-15       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Clinical significance of cytogenetic studies in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: experience of the BFM trials.

Authors:  J Harbott; J Ritterbach; W D Ludwig; C R Bartram; A Reiter; F Lampert
Journal:  Recent Results Cancer Res       Date:  1993

Review 5.  Fluorescence in situ hybridization in leukemia. Applications in diagnosis, subclassification, and monitoring the response to therapy.

Authors:  J Anastasi
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1993-03-20       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 6.  Prognostic and biological importance of chromosome findings in acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  L M Secker-Walker
Journal:  Cancer Genet Cytogenet       Date:  1990-10-01

Review 7.  Clinical and biological importance of cytogenetic abnormalities in childhood and adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  Bertil Johansson; Fredrik Mertens; Felix Mitelman
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.709

8.  Ploidy of lymphoblasts is the strongest predictor of treatment outcome in B-progenitor cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia of childhood: a Pediatric Oncology Group study.

Authors:  R Trueworthy; J Shuster; T Look; W Crist; M Borowitz; A Carroll; L Frankel; M Harris; H Wagner; M Haggard
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Quantitative acute leukemia cytogenetics.

Authors:  F Mitelman; S Heim
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 5.006

10.  Cytotoxic drug sensitivity of Epstein-Barr virus transformed lymphoblastoid B-cells.

Authors:  Laszlo Markasz; György Stuber; Emilie Flaberg; Asa Gustafsson Jernberg; Staffan Eksborg; Eva Olah; Henriette Skribek; Laszlo Szekely
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2006-11-13       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.