Literature DB >> 1548523

Ploidy of lymphoblasts is the strongest predictor of treatment outcome in B-progenitor cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia of childhood: a Pediatric Oncology Group study.

R Trueworthy1, J Shuster, T Look, W Crist, M Borowitz, A Carroll, L Frankel, M Harris, H Wagner, M Haggard.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Using the technique of recursive partitioning and amalgamation analysis with verification, the Pediatric Oncology Group (POG) investigated the independent prognostic significance of previously published prognostic factors significantly associated with event-free survival (EFS) in B-progenitor cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Age, leukocyte count, sex, immunophenotype (expression of cytoplasmic immunoglobulin [Ig] and of surface antigens CD10 and CD34), and DNA index (ratio of the flow cytometry-determined DNA content of leukemia cells to that of normal diploid cells) were the variables used in the evaluation of four antimetabolite-based chemotherapy regimens in 1,535 children with the newly diagnosed B-progenitor cell ALL between February 1986 and May 1990.
RESULTS: There were three subgroups at widely different risks of treatment failure. A DNA index greater than 1.16 was the most prognostic feature. The final prognostic subgrouping was as follows: (1) DNA index greater than 1.16; (2) DNA index less than or equal to 1.16, age less than 11.0 years, and leukocyte count less than 50 x 10(9)/L; and (3) DNA index less than or equal to 1.16, (age greater than 11.0 years, and/or leukocyte count greater than 50 x 10(9)/L). These groups made up 20%, 53%, and 27% of the patients and had 4-year EFS rates (SE) of 90.1% (6.3%), 80.5% (5.1%), and 50.4% (7.6%), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Use of the DNA index, leukocyte count, and age--data that are relatively inexpensive and simple to obtain--may be sufficient to stratify patients with B-progenitor cell ALL for risk-directed therapy. Patients at an extremely low risk of failing therapy (approximately 20% of cases in this study) can thus be identified and spared the toxic short-term and late effects of more intensive therapies that may be needed for children with less favorable clinical and biologic features.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1548523     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1992.10.4.606

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  17 in total

Review 1.  Beyond the 2008 World Health Organization classification: the role of the hematopathology laboratory in the diagnosis and management of acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  Stephanie McGregor; Jennifer McNeer; Sandeep Gurbuxani
Journal:  Semin Diagn Pathol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.464

2.  Ten-year experiences on initial genetic examination in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in Hungary (1993-2002). Technical approaches and clinical implementation.

Authors:  Eva Olah; Erzsebet Balogh; Laszlo Pajor; Zsuzsanna Jakab
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 3.201

3.  Genes contributing to minimal residual disease in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: prognostic significance of CASP8AP2.

Authors:  Christian Flotho; Elaine Coustan-Smith; Deqing Pei; Shotaro Iwamoto; Guangchun Song; Cheng Cheng; Ching-Hon Pui; James R Downing; Dario Campana
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2006-04-20       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 4.  Acute lymphoblastic leukemia: optimizing treatment strategies in children.

Authors:  Ajay Vora
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.022

Review 5.  Routine and specialised techniques in the diagnosis of haematological neoplasms.

Authors:  B J Bain
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Results of the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute ALL Consortium Protocol 95-01 for children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  Albert Moghrabi; Donna E Levy; Barbara Asselin; Ronald Barr; Luis Clavell; Craig Hurwitz; Yvan Samson; Marshall Schorin; Virginia K Dalton; Steven E Lipshultz; Donna S Neuberg; Richard D Gelber; Harvey J Cohen; Stephen E Sallan; Lewis B Silverman
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2006-09-26       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  Risk- and response-based classification of childhood B-precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a combined analysis of prognostic markers from the Pediatric Oncology Group (POG) and Children's Cancer Group (CCG).

Authors:  Kirk R Schultz; D Jeanette Pullen; Harland N Sather; Jonathan J Shuster; Meenakshi Devidas; Michael J Borowitz; Andrew J Carroll; Nyla A Heerema; Jeffrey E Rubnitz; Mignon L Loh; Elizabeth A Raetz; Naomi J Winick; Stephen P Hunger; William L Carroll; Paul S Gaynon; Bruce M Camitta
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2006-09-26       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 8.  Long-term outcome of treatment with protocols AL841, AL851, and ALHR88 in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: results obtained by the Kyushu-Yamaguchi Children's Cancer Study Group.

Authors:  A Matsuzaki; E Ishii; Y Nagatoshi; H Eguchi; H Koga; F Yanai; H Inada; K Nibu; Y Tamai; K Akiyoshi; H Nakayama; T Hara; H Take; S Miyazaki; J Okamura
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.490

9.  Impact of cytogenetics on the outcome of adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia: results of Southwest Oncology Group 9400 study.

Authors:  Vinod Pullarkat; Marilyn L Slovak; Kenneth J Kopecky; Stephen J Forman; Frederick R Appelbaum
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 22.113

10.  Stroma-supported culture in childhood B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells predicts treatment outcome.

Authors:  M Kumagai; A Manabe; C H Pui; F G Behm; S C Raimondi; M L Hancock; H Mahmoud; W M Crist; D Campana
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1996-02-01       Impact factor: 14.808

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.