AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: In 2003, guidelines for management of diabetic foot infection (DFI) were written by the authors' team according to the guidelines of the International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot. The effects of implementing these guidelines on the microbiology and costs of infected diabetic foot ulcers were assessed. METHODS: From 2003 to 2007, potential beneficial effects of implementing these guidelines were assessed by comparison over time of bacteriological data (number of bacterial samples, number of microorganisms isolated in cultures, prevalence of multidrug-resistant organisms [MDRO] and colonising flora), and costs related to use of antimicrobial agents and microbiology laboratory workload. RESULTS: The study included 405 consecutive diabetic patients referred to the Diabetic Foot Unit for a suspected DFI. From 2003 to 2007, a significant decrease was observed in the median number of bacteria species per sample (from 4.1 to 1.6), prevalence of MDRO (35.2% vs 16.3%) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (52.2% vs 18.9%) (p < 0.001). Moreover, prevalence of pathogens considered as colonisers dramatically fell from 23.1% to 5.8% of all isolates (p < 0.001). In parallel, implementation of guidelines was associated with a saving of euro14,914 (US$20,046) related to a reduced microbiology laboratory workload and euro109,305 (US$147,536) due to reduced prescription of extended-spectrum antibiotic agents. CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: Implementation of guidelines for obtaining specimens for culture from patients with DFI is cost-saving and provides interesting quality indicators in the global management of DFI.
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: In 2003, guidelines for management of diabetic foot infection (DFI) were written by the authors' team according to the guidelines of the International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot. The effects of implementing these guidelines on the microbiology and costs of infected diabetic foot ulcers were assessed. METHODS: From 2003 to 2007, potential beneficial effects of implementing these guidelines were assessed by comparison over time of bacteriological data (number of bacterial samples, number of microorganisms isolated in cultures, prevalence of multidrug-resistant organisms [MDRO] and colonising flora), and costs related to use of antimicrobial agents and microbiology laboratory workload. RESULTS: The study included 405 consecutive diabeticpatients referred to the Diabetic Foot Unit for a suspected DFI. From 2003 to 2007, a significant decrease was observed in the median number of bacteria species per sample (from 4.1 to 1.6), prevalence of MDRO (35.2% vs 16.3%) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (52.2% vs 18.9%) (p < 0.001). Moreover, prevalence of pathogens considered as colonisers dramatically fell from 23.1% to 5.8% of all isolates (p < 0.001). In parallel, implementation of guidelines was associated with a saving of euro14,914 (US$20,046) related to a reduced microbiology laboratory workload and euro109,305 (US$147,536) due to reduced prescription of extended-spectrum antibiotic agents. CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: Implementation of guidelines for obtaining specimens for culture from patients with DFI is cost-saving and provides interesting quality indicators in the global management of DFI.
Authors: Benjamin A Lipsky; Anthony R Berendt; H Gunner Deery; John M Embil; Warren S Joseph; Adolf W Karchmer; Jack L LeFrock; Daniel P Lew; Jon T Mader; Carl Norden; James S Tan Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2004-09-10 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: W J Jeffcoate; B A Lipsky; A R Berendt; P R Cavanagh; S A Bus; E J G Peters; W H van Houtum; G D Valk; K Bakker Journal: Diabet Med Date: 2008-12 Impact factor: 4.359
Authors: A R Berendt; E J G Peters; K Bakker; J M Embil; M Eneroth; R J Hinchliffe; W J Jeffcoate; B A Lipsky; E Senneville; J Teh; G D Valk Journal: Diabetes Metab Res Rev Date: 2008 May-Jun Impact factor: 4.876
Authors: L Prompers; M Huijberts; N Schaper; J Apelqvist; K Bakker; M Edmonds; P Holstein; E Jude; A Jirkovska; D Mauricio; A Piaggesi; H Reike; M Spraul; K Van Acker; S Van Baal; F Van Merode; L Uccioli; V Urbancic; G Ragnarson Tennvall Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2008-07-22 Impact factor: 10.122