Literature DB >> 20570327

No shortcuts to pig embryonic stem cells.

T A L Brevini1, G Pennarossa, F Gandolfi.   

Abstract

The establishment of embryonic stem cell (ESC) lines in domestic species could have great impact in the agricultural as well as in the biomedical field. In particular, derivation of pig ESC would find important applications aimed at improving health and production traits of this species through genetic engineering. Similarly, the immunological, morphological, physiological, and functional similarities to the human make the pig a very effective and suitable animal model for biomedical studies and pre-clinical trials. While proven blastocyst-derived mouse and human ESC lines have been established, no validated porcine ESC (pESC) lines are available. In the present manuscript we briefly discuss some of the factors that make the establishment of ESC lines in the pig, and in animal species other than mouse and human, a very slow process. The paucity of information related to morphology, pluripotency markers, differentiation capability hampers a thorough evaluation of the validity of putative lines. These difficulties are further increased by the lack of reliable antibodies, reagents, and in vitro culture systems that could ensure reliable results in the pig and allow for the screening and long-term maintenance of pESC. Data from the literature suggest that similar regulatory pathways are likely to exist among different species. Coupling of these pathways with their distinct expression patterns, the relative concentrations of pluripotency-related molecules, and timing of embryo development, along with supportive micro-environmental conditions, would appear to vary in a species-specific manner. We feel that the understanding of these subtle but meaningful diversities may provide beneficial information about the isolation of genuine porcine embryonic stem cells. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20570327     DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2010.04.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theriogenology        ISSN: 0093-691X            Impact factor:   2.740


  10 in total

Review 1.  Interspecies chimeric complementation for the generation of functional human tissues and organs in large animal hosts.

Authors:  Jun Wu; Juan Carlos Izpisua Belmonte
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 2.788

Review 2.  Induced pluripotent stem cells: Mechanisms, achievements and perspectives in farm animals.

Authors:  Dharmendra Kumar; Thirumala R Talluri; Taruna Anand; Wilfried A Kues
Journal:  World J Stem Cells       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 5.326

3.  Capturing bovine pluripotency.

Authors:  Ye Yuan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Xenotransplantation: Progress Along Paths Uncertain from Models to Application.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Platt; Marilia Cascalho; Jorge A Piedrahita
Journal:  ILAR J       Date:  2018-12-31

5.  Putative porcine embryonic stem cell lines derived from aggregated four-celled cloned embryos produced by oocyte bisection cloning.

Authors:  Chawalit Siriboon; Yu-Hsuan Lin; Michel Kere; Chun-Da Chen; Lih-Ren Chen; Chien-Hong Chen; Ching-Fu Tu; Neng-Wen Lo; Jyh-Cherng Ju
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Current state of the opportunities for derivation of germ-like cells from pluripotent stem cells: are you a man, or a mouse?

Authors:  Rumena Petkova; Borislav Arabadjiev; Stoyan Chakarov; Roumen Pankov
Journal:  Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 1.632

Review 7.  Perspectives of pluripotent stem cells in livestock.

Authors:  Dharmendra Kumar; Thirumala R Talluri; Naresh L Selokar; Iqbal Hyder; Wilfried A Kues
Journal:  World J Stem Cells       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 5.326

Review 8.  Current Advances in 3D Tissue and Organ Reconstruction.

Authors:  Georgia Pennarossa; Sharon Arcuri; Teresina De Iorio; Fulvio Gandolfi; Tiziana A L Brevini
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  Development of a porcine (Sus scofa) embryo-specific microarray: array annotation and validation.

Authors:  Stephen Tsoi; Chi Zhou; Jason R Grant; J Alexander Pasternak; John Dobrinsky; Philippe Rigault; Julie Nieminen; Marc-André Sirard; Claude Robert; George R Foxcroft; Michael K Dyck
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  Generation of minipigs with targeted transgene insertion by recombinase-mediated cassette exchange (RMCE) and somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT).

Authors:  Jannik Ejnar Jakobsen; Marianne G Johansen; Mette Schmidt; Frederik Dagnæs-Hansen; Karen Dam; Anders Gunnarsson; Ying Liu; Peter M Kragh; Rong Li; Ida E Holm; Henrik Callesen; Jacob Giehm Mikkelsen; Anders Lade Nielsen; Arne Lund Jørgensen
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 2.788

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.