Literature DB >> 20570046

Optimization of STEM tomography acquisition--a comparison of convergent beam and parallel beam STEM tomography.

Johannes Biskupek1, Jens Leschner, Paul Walther, Ute Kaiser.   

Abstract

In this paper two imaging modes in a state-of-the-art scanning transmission electron microscope (STEM) are compared: conventional STEM with a convergent beam (referred to as nanoprobe) and STEM with a parallel beam (referred to as microprobe). The effect and influence of both modes with respect to their depth of field are investigated. Tomograms of a human white blood cell (hemophagocytes) are acquired, aligned, and evaluated. It is shown that STEM using a parallel beam produces tomograms with fewer distortions and artifacts that allows resolving finer features. Microprobe STEM tomography is advantageous especially in life science, when semi-thin sections (approximately 0.5 microm thick) of biological samples are imaged at relatively low magnification with a large field of view. 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 20570046     DOI: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2010.05.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultramicroscopy        ISSN: 0304-3991            Impact factor:   2.689


  11 in total

1.  Dual-axis electron tomography of biological specimens: Extending the limits of specimen thickness with bright-field STEM imaging.

Authors:  Alioscka A Sousa; Afrouz A Azari; Guofeng Zhang; Richard D Leapman
Journal:  J Struct Biol       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 2.867

2.  Preparation of cryofixed cells for improved 3D ultrastructure with scanning transmission electron tomography.

Authors:  Katharina Höhn; Michaela Sailer; Li Wang; Myriam Lorenz; Marion E Schneider; Paul Walther
Journal:  Histochem Cell Biol       Date:  2010-11-27       Impact factor: 4.304

3.  Preparation and Observation of Thick Biological Samples by Scanning Transmission Electron Tomography.

Authors:  Sylvain Trépout; Philippe Bastin; Sergio Marco
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2017-03-12       Impact factor: 1.355

4.  STEM tomography of high-pressure frozen and freeze-substituted cells: a comparison of image stacks obtained at 200 kV or 300 kV.

Authors:  Paul Walther; Andrea Bauer; Nadia Wenske; Alberto Catanese; Débora Garrido; Marion Schneider
Journal:  Histochem Cell Biol       Date:  2018-09-18       Impact factor: 4.304

5.  Coexistence of both gyroid chiralities in individual butterfly wing scales of Callophrys rubi.

Authors:  Benjamin Winter; Benjamin Butz; Christel Dieker; Gerd E Schröder-Turk; Klaus Mecke; Erdmann Spiecker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Measuring the Autocorrelation Function of Nanoscale Three-Dimensional Density Distribution in Individual Cells Using Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopy, Atomic Force Microscopy, and a New Deconvolution Algorithm.

Authors:  Yue Li; Di Zhang; Ilker Capoglu; Karl A Hujsak; Dhwanil Damania; Lusik Cherkezyan; Eric Roth; Reiner Bleher; Jinsong S Wu; Hariharan Subramanian; Vinayak P Dravid; Vadim Backman
Journal:  Microsc Microanal       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 4.127

Review 7.  Development and application of STEM for the biological sciences.

Authors:  Alioscka A Sousa; Richard D Leapman
Journal:  Ultramicroscopy       Date:  2012-05-18       Impact factor: 2.689

8.  Correlative VIS-fluorescence and soft X-ray cryo-microscopy/tomography of adherent cells.

Authors:  Christoph Hagen; Peter Guttmann; Barbara Klupp; Stephan Werner; Stefan Rehbein; Thomas C Mettenleiter; Gerd Schneider; Kay Grünewald
Journal:  J Struct Biol       Date:  2011-12-24       Impact factor: 2.867

Review 9.  Viral Infection at High Magnification: 3D Electron Microscopy Methods to Analyze the Architecture of Infected Cells.

Authors:  Inés Romero-Brey; Ralf Bartenschlager
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2015-12-03       Impact factor: 5.048

10.  Quantification and optimization of ADF-STEM image contrast for beam-sensitive materials.

Authors:  Karthikeyan Gnanasekaran; Gijsbertus de With; Heiner Friedrich
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 2.963

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.