Literature DB >> 20568011

Predicting potentially plant-available lead in contaminated residential sites.

Syam S Andra1, Dibyendu Sarkar, Sumathi K M Saminathan, Rupali Datta.   

Abstract

Lead (Pb)-based paints pose a serious health problem to people living in residential settings constructed prior to 1978. Children are at a greater risk to Pb exposure resulting from hand-to-mouth activity in Pb-contaminated residential soils. For soil Pb, the most environmentally friendly, potentially cheap, and visually unobtrusive in situ technology is phytoremediation. However, the limiting factor in a successful phytoremediation strategy is the availability of Pb for plant uptake. The purpose of this study was to establish a relationship between soil properties and the plant-available/exchangeable Pb fraction in the selected Pb-based paint-contaminated residential sites. We selected 20 such sites from two different locations (San Antonio, Texas and Baltimore, Maryland) with varying soil properties and total soil Pb concentrations ranging between 256 and 4,182 mg kg(-1). Despite higher Pb levels in these soils that exceeds US EPA permissible limit of 400 mg kg(-1), it is known that the plant-available Pb pools are significantly lower because of their sorption to soil components such as organic matter, Fe-Mn oxides, and clays, and their precipitation in the form of carbonates, hydroxides, and phosphates. Principal component analysis and hierarchical clustering showed that the potentially plant-available Pb fraction is controlled by soil pH in the case of acidic Baltimore soils, while soil organic matter plays a major role in alkaline San Antonio soils. Statistical models developed suggest that Pb is likely to be more available for plant uptake in Baltimore soils and a chelant-assisted phytoextraction strategy will be potentially necessary for San Antonio soils in mobilizing Pb from complexed pool to the plant-available pool. A thorough knowledge of site-specific factors is therefore essential in developing a suitable and successful phytoremediation model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20568011     DOI: 10.1007/s10661-010-1559-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  14 in total

1.  Lead contamination in tea garden soils and factors affecting its bioavailability.

Authors:  Chong Wei Jin; Shao Jian Zheng; Yun Feng He; Gen Di Zhou; Zhong Xian Zhou
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2005-01-01       Impact factor: 7.086

2.  Influence of sediment redox conditions on release/solubility of metals and nutrients in a Louisiana Mississippi River deltaic plain freshwater lake.

Authors:  Shenyu Miao; R D DeLaune; A Jugsujinda
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2006-08-24       Impact factor: 7.963

3.  Correlation of the partitioning of dissolved organic matter fractions with the desorption of Cd, Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn from 18 Dutch soils.

Authors:  Christopher A Impellitteri; Yuefeng Lu; Jennifer K Saxe; Herbert E Allen; Willie J G M Peijnenburg
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 9.621

4.  Weathering of lead bullets and their environmental effects at outdoor shooting ranges.

Authors:  Xinde Cao; Lena Q Ma; Ming Chen; Donald W Hardison; Willie G Harris
Journal:  J Environ Qual       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.751

5.  Application of ridge regression to quantify marginal effects of collinear soil properties on phytoaccumulation of arsenic, cadmium, lead, and zinc.

Authors:  Richard H Anderson; Nicholas T Basta
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2008-11-03       Impact factor: 3.742

6.  Analysis of phytochelatin complexes in the lead tolerant vetiver grass [Vetiveria zizanioides (L.)] using liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Syam S Andra; Rupali Datta; Dibyendu Sarkar; Sumathi K M Saminathan; Conor P Mullens; Stephan B H Bach
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 8.071

7.  Chelant-aided enhancement of lead mobilization in residential soils.

Authors:  Dibyendu Sarkar; Syam S Andra; Sumathi K M Saminathan; Rupali Datta
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2008-05-13       Impact factor: 8.071

8.  Solubility of lead, zinc and copper added to mineral soils.

Authors:  C E Martínez; H L Motto
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 8.071

9.  Impacts of phosphate amendments on lead biogeochemistry at a contaminated site.

Authors:  Xinde Cao; Lena Q Ma; Ming Chen; Satya P Singh; Willie G Harris
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2002-12-15       Impact factor: 9.028

10.  The prevalence of lead-based paint hazards in U.S. housing.

Authors:  David E Jacobs; Robert P Clickner; Joey Y Zhou; Susan M Viet; David A Marker; John W Rogers; Darryl C Zeldin; Pamela Broene; Warren Friedman
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  2 in total

1.  Exchangeable lead from prediction models relates to vetiver lead uptake in different soil types.

Authors:  Syam S Andra; Dibyendu Sarkar; Sumathi K M Saminathan; Rupali Datta
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Arsenic mobility in the amended mine tailings and its impact on soil enzyme activity.

Authors:  Namin Koo; Sang-Hwan Lee; Jeong-Gyu Kim
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 4.609

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.