Literature DB >> 20567624

Multimodality breast cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition.

I Trop1, L Lalonde, M H Mayrand, J David, N Larouche, D Provencher.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Women with a predisposition for breast cancer require a tailored screening program for early cancer detection. We evaluated the performance of mammography (MG), ultrasonography (US), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) screening in these women. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In asymptomatic women either confirmed as BRCA1/2 carriers, or having a greater than 30% probability of being so as estimated by brcapro [Berry D, Parmigiani G. Duke SPORE (Specialized Program of Research Excellence) in Breast Cancer. 1999], we conducted a prospective comparative trial consisting of annual MRI and MG, and biannual US and clinical breast examination. All evaluations were done within 30 days of one another. For each screening round, imaging tests were independently interpreted by three radiologists.
RESULTS: The study enrolled 184 women, and 387 screening rounds were performed, detecting 12 cancers (9 infiltrating, 3 in situ), for an overall cancer yield of 6.5%. At diagnosis, 7 infiltrating cancers were smaller than 2 cm (T1); only 1 woman presented with axillary nodal metastases. All tumours were negative for the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2. Of the 12 cancers, MRI detected 10, and MG, 7; US did not identify any additional cancers. The overall recall rate after MRI was 21.8%, as compared with 11.4% for US and 16.1% for MG. Recall rates declined with successive screening rounds. In total, 45 biopsies were performed: 21 as a result of an US abnormality; 17, because of an MRI lesion; and 7, because of a MG anomaly.
INTERPRETATION: In high-risk women, MRI offers the best sensitivity for breast cancer screening. The combination of yearly MRI and MG reached a negative predictive value of 100%. The recall rate is greatest with MRI, but declines for all modalities with successive screening rounds.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BRCA1; BRCA2; Breast cancer; high-risk; magnetic resonance imaging; mammography; screening; ultrasonography

Year:  2010        PMID: 20567624      PMCID: PMC2880901          DOI: 10.3747/co.v17i3.494

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Oncol        ISSN: 1198-0052            Impact factor:   3.677


  38 in total

1.  A significant response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in BRCA1/2 related breast cancer.

Authors:  P O Chappuis; J Goffin; N Wong; C Perret; P Ghadirian; P N Tonin; W D Foulkes
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 6.318

2.  Magnetic resonance imaging and mammography in women with a hereditary risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  M J Stoutjesdijk; C Boetes; G J Jager; L Beex; P Bult; J H Hendriks; R J Laheij; L Massuger; L E van Die; T Wobbes; J O Barentsz
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2001-07-18       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Genetic heterogeneity and penetrance analysis of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in breast cancer families. The Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium.

Authors:  D Ford; D F Easton; M Stratton; S Narod; D Goldgar; P Devilee; D T Bishop; B Weber; G Lenoir; J Chang-Claude; H Sobol; M D Teare; J Struewing; A Arason; S Scherneck; J Peto; T R Rebbeck; P Tonin; S Neuhausen; R Barkardottir; J Eyfjord; H Lynch; B A Ponder; S A Gayther; M Zelada-Hedman
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  BRCAPRO validation, sensitivity of genetic testing of BRCA1/BRCA2, and prevalence of other breast cancer susceptibility genes.

Authors:  Donald A Berry; Edwin S Iversen; Daniel F Gudbjartsson; Elaine H Hiller; Judy E Garber; Beth N Peshkin; Caryn Lerman; Patrice Watson; Henry T Lynch; Susan G Hilsenbeck; Wendy S Rubinstein; Kevin S Hughes; Giovanni Parmigiani
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-06-01       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Outcome of preventive surgery and screening for breast and ovarian cancer in BRCA mutation carriers.

Authors:  Lauren Scheuer; Noah Kauff; Mark Robson; Bridget Kelly; Richard Barakat; Jaya Satagopan; Nathan Ellis; Martee Hensley; Jeff Boyd; Patrick Borgen; Larry Norton; Kenneth Offit
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-03-01       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation.

Authors:  Noah D Kauff; Jaya M Satagopan; Mark E Robson; Lauren Scheuer; Martee Hensley; Clifford A Hudis; Nathan A Ellis; Jeff Boyd; Patrick I Borgen; Richard R Barakat; Larry Norton; Mercedes Castiel; Khedoudja Nafa; Kenneth Offit
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-05-20       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Prophylactic oophorectomy in carriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations.

Authors:  Timothy R Rebbeck; Henry T Lynch; Susan L Neuhausen; Steven A Narod; Laura Van't Veer; Judy E Garber; Gareth Evans; Claudine Isaacs; Mary B Daly; Ellen Matloff; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Barbara L Weber
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-05-20       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Breast cancer screening: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Linda L Humphrey; Mark Helfand; Benjamin K S Chan; Steven H Woolf
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-09-03       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Mammography service screening and mortality in breast cancer patients: 20-year follow-up before and after introduction of screening.

Authors:  Laszlo Tabar; Ming-Fang Yen; Bedrich Vitak; Hsiu-Hsi Tony Chen; Robert A Smith; Stephen W Duffy
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-04-26       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  The development of interval breast malignancies in patients with BRCA mutations.

Authors:  Ian K Komenaka; Beth-Ann Ditkoff; Kathie-Ann Joseph; Donna Russo; Prakash Gorroochurn; Marie Ward; Elizabeth Horowitz; Mahmoud B El-Tamer; Freya R Schnabel
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-05-15       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  3 in total

1.  Re. Multimodality breast cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition.

Authors:  S A Narod
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.677

2.  Contribution of mammography to MRI screening in BRCA mutation carriers by BRCA status and age: individual patient data meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xuan-Anh Phi; Sepideh Saadatmand; Geertruida H De Bock; Ellen Warner; Francesco Sardanelli; Martin O Leach; Christopher C Riedl; Isabelle Trop; Maartje J Hooning; Rodica Mandel; Filippo Santoro; Gek Kwan-Lim; Thomas H Helbich; Madeleine M A Tilanus-Linthorst; Edwin R van den Heuvel; Nehmat Houssami
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 7.640

3.  Prospective blinded surveillance screening of Swedish women with increased hereditary risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  Annelie Liljegren; Anna von Wachenfeldt; Edward Azavedo; Sandra Eloranta; Helene Grundström; Anne Kinhult Ståhlbom; Ann Sundbom; Per Sundén; Gunilla Svane; Dieter Ulitzsch; Brita Arver
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 4.872

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.