Literature DB >> 15139048

The development of interval breast malignancies in patients with BRCA mutations.

Ian K Komenaka1, Beth-Ann Ditkoff, Kathie-Ann Joseph, Donna Russo, Prakash Gorroochurn, Marie Ward, Elizabeth Horowitz, Mahmoud B El-Tamer, Freya R Schnabel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: At present, there is no consensus regarding how frequently BRCA mutation carriers should be screened for malignancies using breast imaging techniques. An interval malignancy is defined as a malignancy that becomes evident during the period between annual screening mammography scans; the finding of such a malignancy indicates that the malignancy either went undetected by the last breast imaging scan or developed during the interval since that last scan.
METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed the medical charts of all BRCA mutation carriers who were followed by the genetic counselor at the Columbia-Presbyterian Comprehensive Breast Center (New York, NY) between September 1995 and September 2002.
RESULTS: Thirteen BRCA mutation carriers elected to undergo close surveillance and thus were followed at our institution. Three of these 13 patients (23%) did not develop breast carcinoma, 4 (31%) developed breast carcinoma that was detected at the time of annual screening, and 6 (46%) developed palpable interval malignancies in less than 12 months. Among the six patients who developed interval malignancies, the mean time between the last screening mammogram and disease presentation was 5.1 months (range, 2-9 months); the average tumor size in this patient subgroup was 1.7 cm (range, 0.8-3 cm). Two of these six patients had ductal carcinoma in situ, whereas the remaining four had invasive breast carcinoma; three patients had positive lymph nodes at presentation. All six patients who developed interval disease exhibited dense breast tissue on the previous mammogram. Focused breast ultrasonography was able to identify the tumor mass in 3 of 4 patients (75%).
CONCLUSIONS: Nearly half of all BRCA-positive women who chose to undergo close surveillance in the current study developed malignant disease less than a year after exhibiting normal findings on screening mammography. Half of these interval malignancies were positive for lymph node involvement. These results suggest that strong consideration should be given to screening BRCA-positive women at more frequent intervals and to using additional imaging techniques, such as breast ultrasonography and/or breast magnetic resonance imaging, as a part of this screening. Copyright 2004 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15139048     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.20221

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  29 in total

1.  Cost-effectiveness of breast MR imaging and screen-film mammography for screening BRCA1 gene mutation carriers.

Authors:  Janie M Lee; Pamela M McMahon; Chung Y Kong; Daniel B Kopans; Paula D Ryan; Elissa M Ozanne; Elkan F Halpern; G Scott Gazelle
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Differences between screen-detected and interval breast cancers among BRCA mutation carriers.

Authors:  Melissa Pilewskie; Emily C Zabor; Elizabeth Gilbert; Michelle Stempel; Oriana Petruolo; Debra Mangino; Mark Robson; Maxine S Jochelson
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Prospective study of breast cancer incidence in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation under surveillance with and without magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Ellen Warner; Kimberley Hill; Petrina Causer; Donald Plewes; Roberta Jong; Martin Yaffe; William D Foulkes; Parviz Ghadirian; Henry Lynch; Fergus Couch; John Wong; Frances Wright; Ping Sun; Steven A Narod
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-03-28       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 4.  Identification and Management of Women With BRCA Mutations or Hereditary Predisposition for Breast and Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Sandhya Pruthi; Bobbie S Gostout; Noralane M Lindor
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 7.616

5.  Multimodality breast cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition.

Authors:  I Trop; L Lalonde; M H Mayrand; J David; N Larouche; D Provencher
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.677

6.  High prevalence of preinvasive lesions adjacent to BRCA1/2-associated breast cancers.

Authors:  Banu Arun; Kristen J Vogel; Adriana Lopez; Mike Hernandez; Deann Atchley; Kristine R Broglio; Christopher I Amos; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Henry Kuerer; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Constance T Albarracin
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2009-01-27

Review 7.  Management of genetic syndromes predisposing to gynecologic cancers.

Authors:  Susan Miesfeldt; Amanda Lamb; Christine Duarte
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2013-03

8.  Breast Cancers Detected at Screening MR Imaging and Mammography in Patients at High Risk: Method of Detection Reflects Tumor Histopathologic Results.

Authors:  Janice S Sung; Sarah Stamler; Jennifer Brooks; Jennifer Kaplan; Tammy Huang; D David Dershaw; Carol H Lee; Elizabeth A Morris; Christopher E Comstock
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 9.  Evaluating the correlation between film mammography and MRI for screening women with increased breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Janie M Lee; Elkan F Halpern; Elizabeth A Rafferty; G Scott Gazelle
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2009-07-25       Impact factor: 3.173

10.  Genetic counseling and clinical management of newly diagnosed breast cancer patients at genetic risk for BRCA germline mutations: perspective of a surgical oncologist.

Authors:  Edibaldo Silva
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2007-10-18       Impact factor: 2.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.