Literature DB >> 20567148

High-grade endometrial carcinoma: serous and grade 3 endometrioid carcinomas have different immunophenotypes and outcomes.

Abdulmohsen Alkushi1, Martin Köbel, Steve E Kalloger, C Blake Gilks.   

Abstract

High-grade endometrial carcinomas are a heterogeneous group of tumors and include grade 3 endometrioid (EC-3), serous (SC), and clear cell carcinomas (CCC). There are conflicting data about the prognosis of these subtypes of high-grade endometrial carcinoma; this may be a result of lack of reproducibility in classifying tumor cell type. The purpose of this study was to examine differences in immunophenotype and outcome in a series of high-grade endometrial carcinomas, focusing on the comparison of EC-3 versus SC. We selected 180 endometrial carcinomas of SC, EC, or CCC type. No mixed carcinomas were included in the study. We chose the following immunohistochemical markers, estrogen receptor (ER), insulin-like growth factor 2 mRNA-binding protein 3 (IMP3), p16, p53, progesterone receptor (PR), and phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) as being significantly differentially expressed in endometrial carcinoma subtypes. The tumors were stratified into 4 groups on the basis of their cell type and grade: EC grade 1 or 2, EC-3, SC, and CCC. Univariate survival analysis revealed significant differences in outcome between the 4 groups (P<0.0001), with significantly longer disease-specific survival for grade 1 or 2 EC versus EC-3 (P=0.0001), and EC-3 versus SC (P=0.0003). p16, PTEN, and IMP3 expression was observed more frequently in SC compared with EC-3 (P<0.0001, P=0.021, and P=0.031, respectively). These 3 markers showed the highest sensitivity and specificity in distinguishing between EC-3 and SC, with receiver operating characteristics area under the curve of 0.85, 0.69, and 0.71, respectively. ER and p53 approached but did not reach significance for differential expression in EC-3 versus SC (P=0.055 and P=0.068, respectively). A combination of p16 and PTEN predicts EC-3 versus SC with a sensitivity of 90.0% and specificity of 96.8%. p16 and PTEN can aid in distinguishing between EC-3 and SC of the endometrium, and are superior to ER, PR, and p53 for this purpose. EC-3 carcinomas have a significantly better prognosis than SC carcinomas of the endometrium.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20567148     DOI: 10.1097/PGP.0b013e3181cd6552

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynecol Pathol        ISSN: 0277-1691            Impact factor:   2.762


  34 in total

Review 1.  The emerging genomic landscape of endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Matthieu Le Gallo; Daphne W Bell
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 8.327

Review 2.  The evolution of endometrial carcinoma classification through application of immunohistochemistry and molecular diagnostics: past, present and future.

Authors:  Emily A Goebel; August Vidal; Xavier Matias-Guiu; C Blake Gilks
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 3.  Practical issues in the diagnosis of serous carcinoma of the endometrium.

Authors:  Sonia Gatius; Xavier Matias-Guiu
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 7.842

Review 4.  How to approach the many faces of endometrioid carcinoma.

Authors:  Anais Malpica
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 7.842

5.  Poor prognosis of uterine serous carcinoma compared with grade 3 endometrioid carcinoma in early stage patients.

Authors:  Ji Young Park; Joo-Hyun Nam; Young-Tak Kim; Yong-Man Kim; Jong-Hyeok Kim; Dae-Yeon Kim; Insuk Sohn; Shin-Wha Lee; Chang Ohk Sung; Kyu-Rae Kim
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2013-02-17       Impact factor: 4.064

6.  Molecular Analysis of Mixed Endometrial Carcinomas Shows Clonality in Most Cases.

Authors:  Martin Köbel; Bo Meng; Lien N Hoang; Noorah Almadani; Xiaodong Li; Robert A Soslow; C Blake Gilks; Cheng-Han Lee
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 6.394

7.  The clinicopathologic significance of p53 and BAF-250a (ARID1A) expression in clear cell carcinoma of the endometrium.

Authors:  Oluwole Fadare; Katja Gwin; Mohamed M Desouki; Marta A Crispens; Howard W Jones; Dineo Khabele; Sharon X Liang; Wenxin Zheng; Khaled Mohammed; Jonathan L Hecht; Vinita Parkash
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2013-03-22       Impact factor: 7.842

8.  The genomics and genetics of endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Andrea J O'Hara; Daphne W Bell
Journal:  Adv Genomics Genet       Date:  2012-03

9.  Application of Immunohistochemistry and Molecular Diagnostics to Clinically Relevant Problems in Endometrial Cancer Bojana Djordjevic, Shannon Westin, Russell R. Broaddus.

Authors:  Bojana Djordjevic; Shannon Westin; Russell R Broaddus
Journal:  Surg Pathol Clin       Date:  2012-12-01

10.  Prognostic importance of DNA ploidy in non-endometrioid, high-risk endometrial carcinomas.

Authors:  Bengt Sorbe
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 2.967

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.