Literature DB >> 26998163

Prognostic importance of DNA ploidy in non-endometrioid, high-risk endometrial carcinomas.

Bengt Sorbe1.   

Abstract

The present study investigated the predictive and prognostic impact of DNA ploidy together with other well-known prognostic factors in a series of non-endometrioid, high-risk endometrial carcinomas. From a complete consecutive series of 4,543 endometrial carcinomas of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stages I-IV, 94 serous carcinomas, 48 clear cell carcinomas and 231 carcinosarcomas were selected as a non-endometrioid, high-risk group for further studies regarding prognosis. The impact of DNA ploidy, as assessed by flow cytometry, was of particular focus. The age of the patients, FIGO stage, depth of myometrial infiltration and tumor expression of p53 were also included in the analyses (univariate and multivariate). In the complete series of cases, the recurrence rate was 37%, and the 5-year overall survival rate was 39% with no difference between the three histological subtypes. The primary cure rate (78%) was also similar for all tumor types studied. DNA ploidy was a significant predictive factor (on univariate analysis) for primary tumor cure rate, and a prognostic factor for survival rate (on univariate and multivariate analyses). The predictive and prognostic impact of DNA ploidy was higher in carcinosarcomas than in serous and clear cell carcinomas. In the majority of multivariate analyses, FIGO stage and depth of myometrial infiltration were the most important predictive (tumor recurrence) and prognostic (survival rate) factors. DNA ploidy status is a less important predictive and prognostic factor in non-endometrioid, high-risk endometrial carcinomas than in the common endometrioid carcinomas, in which FIGO and nuclear grade also are highly significant and important factors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA ploidy; carcinosarcoma; clear cell carcinoma; endometrial carcinoma; high-risk histology; prognosis; serous carcinoma

Year:  2016        PMID: 26998163      PMCID: PMC4774616          DOI: 10.3892/ol.2016.4178

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncol Lett        ISSN: 1792-1074            Impact factor:   2.967


  31 in total

1.  Prognostic significance of angiogenesis and Ki-67, p53, and p21 expression: a population-based endometrial carcinoma study.

Authors:  H B Salvesen; O E Iversen; L A Akslen
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Vaginal brachytherapy versus pelvic external beam radiotherapy for patients with endometrial cancer of high-intermediate risk (PORTEC-2): an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised trial.

Authors:  R A Nout; V T H B M Smit; H Putter; I M Jürgenliemk-Schulz; J J Jobsen; L C H W Lutgens; E M van der Steen-Banasik; J W M Mens; A Slot; M C Stenfert Kroese; B N F M van Bunningen; A C Ansink; W L J van Putten; C L Creutzberg
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2010-03-06       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  A population-based series of uterine carcinosarcomas with long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Bengt Sorbe; Gunnar Paulsson; Solveig Andersson; Gunnar Steineck
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 4.089

4.  Uterine papillary serous carcinoma: patterns of metastatic spread.

Authors:  B A Goff; D Kato; R A Schmidt; M Ek; J A Ferry; H G Muntz; J M Cain; H K Tamimi; D C Figge; B E Greer
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 5.  FIGO stage, histology, histologic grade, age and race as prognostic factors in determining survival for cancers of the female gynecological system: an analysis of 1973-87 SEER cases of cancers of the endometrium, cervix, ovary, vulva, and vagina.

Authors:  C L Kosary
Journal:  Semin Surg Oncol       Date:  1994 Jan-Feb

Review 6.  Update on pathology, staging and molecular pathology of endometrial (uterine corpus) adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Joanne K L Rutgers
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 3.404

7.  Patterns of failure after the multimodality treatment of uterine papillary serous carcinoma.

Authors:  Brij M Sood; Joan Jones; Sajel Gupta; Dineo Khabele; Chandan Guha; Carol Runowicz; Gary Goldberg; Abbie Fields; Patrick Anderson; B Vikram
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2003-09-01       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  Prognostic importance of DNA ploidy and DNA index in stage I and II endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the endometrium.

Authors:  M Pradhan; V M Abeler; H E Danielsen; B Sandstad; C G Tropé; G B Kristensen; B Å Risberg
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2011-09-30       Impact factor: 32.976

9.  Predictive and prognostic factors in definition of risk groups in endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  Bengt Sorbe
Journal:  ISRN Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-11-14

10.  Prognostic significance of DNA cytometry in carcinoma of the uterine cervix FIGO stage IB and II.

Authors:  H J Grote; N Friedrichs; N Pomjanski; H F Guhde; O Reich; A Böcking
Journal:  Anal Cell Pathol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.916

View more
  1 in total

1.  Targeted Silencing of S100A8 Gene by miR-24 to Increase Chemotherapy Sensitivity of Endometrial Carcinoma Cells to Paclitaxel.

Authors:  Bin Lang; Chao Shang; Lirong Meng
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2016-06-09
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.