OBJECTIVE: To characterize rehabilitation services in two types of postacute facilities in patients who underwent hip replacement following a hip fracture. DESIGN: Multisite prospective observational cohort from 6 freestanding skilled nursing facilities and 11 inpatient rehabilitation facilities. Patients (n = 218) with hip fracture who had either hemiarthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty followed by rehabilitation at skilled nursing facilities or inpatient rehabilitation facilities were enrolled. Using a point-of-care methodology, we recorded data from actual physical therapy and occupational therapy sessions completed including functional outcomes during the postacute admission. RESULTS: Onset time from surgical repair to rehabilitation admission was not significantly different between sites. Average skilled nursing facilities length of stay was 24.7 +/- 13.6 days, whereas inpatient rehabilitation facilities was 13.0 +/- 5.7 days (P < 0.01). Total hours of physical therapy and occupational therapy services per patient day were 1.2 in skilled nursing facilities and 2.0 in inpatient rehabilitation facilities. For weekdays only, these data changed to 1.6 in skilled nursing facilities and 2.6 hrs per patient in inpatient rehabilitation facilities (P < 0.01). Patients in inpatient rehabilitation facilities accrued more time for gait training and exercise in physical therapy, which was found to be 48% and 40% greater, respectively, through day 8. In occupational therapy, patients of inpatient rehabilitation facilities had more time allocated to lower body dressing and transfers. CONCLUSIONS: Significant differences in rehabilitation activities were observed, and intensity was notably different within the first 8 therapy days even though baseline demographics and medical complexity were comparable across facility types. Our data suggest that after more complex hip replacement surgery, hip fracture patients can tolerate more intensive therapy earlier within the rehabilitation program.
OBJECTIVE: To characterize rehabilitation services in two types of postacute facilities in patients who underwent hip replacement following a hip fracture. DESIGN: Multisite prospective observational cohort from 6 freestanding skilled nursing facilities and 11 inpatient rehabilitation facilities. Patients (n = 218) with hip fracture who had either hemiarthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty followed by rehabilitation at skilled nursing facilities or inpatient rehabilitation facilities were enrolled. Using a point-of-care methodology, we recorded data from actual physical therapy and occupational therapy sessions completed including functional outcomes during the postacute admission. RESULTS: Onset time from surgical repair to rehabilitation admission was not significantly different between sites. Average skilled nursing facilities length of stay was 24.7 +/- 13.6 days, whereas inpatient rehabilitation facilities was 13.0 +/- 5.7 days (P < 0.01). Total hours of physical therapy and occupational therapy services per patient day were 1.2 in skilled nursing facilities and 2.0 in inpatient rehabilitation facilities. For weekdays only, these data changed to 1.6 in skilled nursing facilities and 2.6 hrs per patient in inpatient rehabilitation facilities (P < 0.01). Patients in inpatient rehabilitation facilities accrued more time for gait training and exercise in physical therapy, which was found to be 48% and 40% greater, respectively, through day 8. In occupational therapy, patients of inpatient rehabilitation facilities had more time allocated to lower body dressing and transfers. CONCLUSIONS: Significant differences in rehabilitation activities were observed, and intensity was notably different within the first 8 therapy days even though baseline demographics and medical complexity were comparable across facility types. Our data suggest that after more complex hip replacement surgery, hip fracturepatients can tolerate more intensive therapy earlier within the rehabilitation program.
Authors: Helen H Host; Catherine E Lang; Mary W Hildebrand; Dequan Zou; Ellen F Binder; Carolyn M Baum; Kenneth E Freedland; Nancy Morrow-Howell; Eric J Lenze Journal: Phys Occup Ther Geriatr Date: 2014-06
Authors: Allison M Gustavson; Rebecca S Boxer; Amy Nordon-Craft; Robin L Marcus; Andrea Daddato; Jennifer E Stevens-Lapsley Journal: Phys Ther J Policy Adm Leadersh Date: 2018-08
Authors: Paul Baker; Carol Coole; Avril Drummond; Sayeed Khan; Catriona McDaid; Catherine Hewitt; Lucksy Kottam; Sarah Ronaldson; Elizabeth Coleman; David A McDonald; Fiona Nouri; Melanie Narayanasamy; Iain McNamara; Judith Fitch; Louise Thomson; Gerry Richardson; Amar Rangan Journal: Health Technol Assess Date: 2020-09 Impact factor: 4.014
Authors: Michael P Cary; Wei Pan; Richard Sloane; Janet Prvu Bettger; Helen Hoenig; Elizabeth I Merwin; Ruth A Anderson Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2016-02-01 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Sarianna Sipilä; Anu Salpakoski; Johanna Edgren; Ari Heinonen; Markku A Kauppinen; Marja Arkela-Kautiainen; Sanna E Sihvonen; Maija Pesola; Taina Rantanen; Mauri Kallinen Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2011-12-07 Impact factor: 2.362