OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of digital tomosynthesis in comparison with digital radiography in the detection of urinary stones with MDCT as the reference standard. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Fifty consecutively enrolled patients (32 men, 18 women; mean age, 51.5 years; range, 19-83 years) referred for unenhanced MDCT of the abdomen with suspicion of urinary stones also underwent digital tomosynthesis and digital radiography (anteroposterior and bladder inlet views). Images from all examinations were randomly read by three blinded radiologists. The mean effective doses for digital tomosynthesis, digital radiography, and low- and high-dose MDCT were measured on a male phantom. Free-response receiver operating characteristics and receiver operating characteristics analyses were used to compare the diagnostic performance of digital radiography with that of digital tomosynthesis. RESULTS: Both types of analysis showed significantly better performance of tomosynthesis over digital radiography for all urinary stones (p < 0.05). No such improvement was found for ureteral stones. The gain in sensitivity with tomosynthesis was largest for stones between 2 and 5 mm in diameter. The mean effective dose was 0.5 mSv for digital radiography, 0.85 mSv for tomosynthesis, 2.5 mSv for low-dose MDCT, and 12.6 mSv for high-dose MDCT. CONCLUSION: Use of digital tomosynthesis of the abdomen results in improved detection of urinary stones in general over digital radiography with only a slight increase in effective dose. Use of tomosynthesis, however, was not associated with major improvement in the diagnosis of ureteral stones. The technique has potential as an alternative imaging technique in the detection and follow-up of urinary stones.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of digital tomosynthesis in comparison with digital radiography in the detection of urinary stones with MDCT as the reference standard. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Fifty consecutively enrolled patients (32 men, 18 women; mean age, 51.5 years; range, 19-83 years) referred for unenhanced MDCT of the abdomen with suspicion of urinary stones also underwent digital tomosynthesis and digital radiography (anteroposterior and bladder inlet views). Images from all examinations were randomly read by three blinded radiologists. The mean effective doses for digital tomosynthesis, digital radiography, and low- and high-dose MDCT were measured on a male phantom. Free-response receiver operating characteristics and receiver operating characteristics analyses were used to compare the diagnostic performance of digital radiography with that of digital tomosynthesis. RESULTS: Both types of analysis showed significantly better performance of tomosynthesis over digital radiography for all urinary stones (p < 0.05). No such improvement was found for ureteral stones. The gain in sensitivity with tomosynthesis was largest for stones between 2 and 5 mm in diameter. The mean effective dose was 0.5 mSv for digital radiography, 0.85 mSv for tomosynthesis, 2.5 mSv for low-dose MDCT, and 12.6 mSv for high-dose MDCT. CONCLUSION: Use of digital tomosynthesis of the abdomen results in improved detection of urinary stones in general over digital radiography with only a slight increase in effective dose. Use of tomosynthesis, however, was not associated with major improvement in the diagnosis of ureteral stones. The technique has potential as an alternative imaging technique in the detection and follow-up of urinary stones.
Authors: Maria Antonietta Mazzei; Susanna Guerrini; Francesco Giuseppe Mazzei; Nevada Cioffi Squitieri; Dario Notaro; Gianmarco de Donato; Giuseppe Galzerano; Palmino Sacco; Francesco Setacci; Luca Volterrani; Carlo Setacci Journal: World J Radiol Date: 2016-05-28
Authors: James T Dobbins; H Page McAdams; John M Sabol; Dev P Chakraborty; Ella A Kazerooni; Gautham P Reddy; Jenny Vikgren; Magnus Båth Journal: Radiology Date: 2016-07-19 Impact factor: 11.105