Literature DB >> 20566321

The confounding effect of response amplitude on MVPA performance measures.

A T Smith1, P Kosillo, A L Williams.   

Abstract

Multi-voxel pattern analysis (MVPA) is proving very powerful in the analysis of fMRI timeseries data, yielding surprising sensitivity, in many different contexts, to the response characteristics of neurons in a given brain region. However, MVPA yields a metric (classification performance) that does not readily lend itself to quantitative comparisons across experimental conditions, brain regions or people. This is because performance is influenced by a number of factors other than the sensitivity of neurons to the experimental manipulation. One such factor that varies widely but has been largely ignored in MVPA studies is the amplitude of the response being decoded. In a noisy system, it is expected that measured classification performance will decline with declining response amplitude, even if the underlying neuronal specificity is constant. We document the relationship between response amplitude and classification performance in the context of orientation decoding in the visual cortex. Flickering sine gratings were presented at each of two orthogonal orientations in a block design (multivariate experiment) or an event-related design (univariate experiment). Response amplitude was manipulated by varying stimulus contrast. Orientation classification performance in retinotopically defined occipital area V1 increased approximately linearly with the logarithm of stimulus contrast. As expected, univariate response amplitude also increased with contrast. Similar results were obtained in V2, V3 and V3A. Plotting classification performance against response amplitude gave a function with a compressive non-linearity that was well fit by a power function. Knowledge of this function potentially allows adjustment of classification performance to take account of the effect of response size, making comparisons across brain areas, categories or people more meaningful.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20566321     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.05.079

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  20 in total

1.  Decoding working memory of stimulus contrast in early visual cortex.

Authors:  Yue Xing; Tim Ledgeway; Paul V McGraw; Denis Schluppeck
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  What do differences between multi-voxel and univariate analysis mean? How subject-, voxel-, and trial-level variance impact fMRI analysis.

Authors:  Tyler Davis; Karen F LaRocque; Jeanette A Mumford; Kenneth A Norman; Anthony D Wagner; Russell A Poldrack
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Seeing touch is correlated with content-specific activity in primary somatosensory cortex.

Authors:  Kaspar Meyer; Jonas T Kaplan; Ryan Essex; Hanna Damasio; Antonio Damasio
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Spatial scale and distribution of neurovascular signals underlying decoding of orientation and eye of origin from fMRI data.

Authors:  Jonas Larsson; Charlotte Harrison; Jade Jackson; Seung-Mock Oh; Vaida Zeringyte
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 5.  Decoding patterns of human brain activity.

Authors:  Frank Tong; Michael S Pratte
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 24.137

6.  Motion direction biases and decoding in human visual cortex.

Authors:  Helena X Wang; Elisha P Merriam; Jeremy Freeman; David J Heeger
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 7.  Deconstructing multivariate decoding for the study of brain function.

Authors:  Martin N Hebart; Chris I Baker
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Thinking about seeing: perceptual sources of knowledge are encoded in the theory of mind brain regions of sighted and blind adults.

Authors:  Jorie Koster-Hale; Marina Bedny; Rebecca Saxe
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2014-06-22

9.  Relationship between BOLD amplitude and pattern classification of orientation-selective activity in the human visual cortex.

Authors:  Frank Tong; Stephenie A Harrison; John A Dewey; Yukiyasu Kamitani
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  What makes a pattern? Matching decoding methods to data in multivariate pattern analysis.

Authors:  Philip A Kragel; R McKell Carter; Scott A Huettel
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2012-11-23       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.