| Literature DB >> 20565920 |
Bakytbek Egemnazarov1, Ralph T Schermuly, Bhola K Dahal, Garry T Elliott, Niel C Hoglen, Mark W Surber, Norbert Weissmann, Friedrich Grimminger, Werner Seeger, Hossein A Ghofrani.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Generalized hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction (HPV) occurring during exposure to hypoxia is a detrimental process resulting in an increase in lung vascular resistance. Nebulization of sodium nitrite has been shown to inhibit HPV. The aim of this project was to investigate and compare the effects of nebulization of nitrite and different formulations of acidified sodium nitrite on acute HPV.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20565920 PMCID: PMC2906446 DOI: 10.1186/1465-9921-11-81
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Respir Res ISSN: 1465-9921
Figure 1Timescale of . A total of six hypoxic maneuvers (3% O2 in an inhaled gas mixture) were performed. The second hypoxic maneuver was used as a control, because the second and subsequent hypoxic maneuvers induced HPV of stable and reproducible strength. Nebulization was initiated at the onset of the third hypoxic maneuver. In dose titration experiments, nitrite nebulizations were performed beginning with the third maneuver. The concentration that was delivered increased with each subsequent nebulization.
Figure 2Dose titration for nebulized nitrite in the isolated perfused lung model. Nitrite was nebulized in increasing concentrations during hypoxic maneuvers. (A) HPV was calculated as the difference between the maximum Ppa during hypoxia and the Ppa during normoxia. (B) Lung weight gain during nebulization. Lungs were freely suspended from a force transducer for monitoring organ weight in a humidified chamber at 39°C. Weight changes were monitored continuously. Values represent differences in lung weight before and after each nebulization procedure. * p < 0.05 vs. PB.
Figure 3Effect of nebulized nitrite and acidified forms of nitrite on the strength of HPV in the isolated perfused lung model. The strength of HPV is represented as the difference between the maximum Ppa during hypoxia and the Ppa during normoxia. * p < 0.05 vs. PB.
Figure 4Impact of nitrite nebulization on the concentration of exhaled NO in the isolated perfused lung model. (A) Exhaled NO was monitored online from the exhaled gas mixture. (B) Hypoxic challenges induced a rapid and reversible decrease in NOex. Nitrite nebulization increased NOex during the hypoxic phase. Values represent the difference between NOex concentrations during hypoxia and during the preceding normoxic phase. * p < 0.05 vs. PB, # p < 0.05 vs. nitrite.
Figure 5Changes in nitrite and nitrite/nitrate (NOx) concentration in perfusate after nebulization. Perfusate samples were collected as depicted in Scheme 1. Samples were immediately frozen and stored at -20°C until analysis. Measurements were performed using a modified Griess reagent according to manufacturer's instructions. (A) Changes in nitrite concentration in recirculating perfusate. (B) Changes in NOx concentration in perfusate.
Figure 6Impact of nitrite nebulization on lung wet to dry ratio. At the end of each experiment, pieces of lung tissue from every lobe were cut. Samples were weighed and dried in an oven at 60°C for 7-9 days until the weight stabilized. Initial weight (wet) was divided by final (dry) weight.
The effect of nebulized nitrite and acidified forms of nitrite on the strength of HPV, Psa and CO in the in vivo model of catheterized rabbits.
| PB | PB + nitrite | PB + nitrite + citrate | p value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HPV | Baseline | 1.24 ± 0.58 | 1.56 ± 0.38 | 1.79 ± 0.50 | n.s. |
| Nebulization | 1.36 ± 0.50 | 0.52 ± 0.39 | 0.69 ± 0.72 | p < 0.05 | |
| (% of baseline value) | 119.52 ± 36.74 | 32.28 ± 26.13 | 36.30 ± 51.32 | p < 0.05 | |
| Systemic hypoxic hypotension | Baseline | -6.78 ± 1.97 | -6.07 ± 0.64 | -7.39 ± 2.61 | n.s. |
| Nebulization | -6.36 ± 1.27 | -5.28 ± 1.39 | -8.16 ± 0.85 | n.s. | |
| Cardiac output | Baseline | 617.63 ± 15.96 | 725.64 ± 39.59 | 575.46 ± 34.64 | n.s. |
| Nebulization | 556.79 ± 37.62 | 589.46 ± 33.28 | 533.05 ± 28.16 | n.s. | |
HPV was calculated as the difference between the maximum Ppa during hypoxia and the Ppa during normoxia. For percentage calculations, the strength of HPV during the second hypoxic challenge was set to 100%, and the value of HPV during nebulization was related to it. Nitrite alone and in acidified forms nebulized during the third hypoxic maneuver significantly inhibited HPV. CO was measured by Fick's method. Blood samples for analysis were drawn during normoxia and at the end of the third hypoxic challenge. Psa was monitored continuously using a catheter placed in the left carotid artery. Values represent the difference between Psa during normoxia and Psa during subsequent hypoxia.