Literature DB >> 20565215

Heightened conflict in cue-target translation increases backward inhibition in set switching.

James A Grange1, George Houghton.   

Abstract

Backward inhibition (BI) is a performance cost that occurs when an individual returns to a task after 1 (vs. more than 1) intervening trial, and it may reflect the inhibition of task-set components during switching. In 3 experiments, we support the theory that inhibition can target cue-based preparatory stages of a task. Participants performed a cued target-localization task that had been previously shown to produce BI. In Experiment 1, reassignment of arbitrary cue-target pairings midway through the experiment doubled the size of BI, though cue, target, and response sets remained unchanged. In Experiment 2, we controlled for effects of order of conditions or simple change of cue meaning. In Experiment 3, we demonstrated that the effect depends on re-pairing members of the same cue and target sets. The results are attributed to heightened conflict (and hence greater inhibition) during cue-target translation when a previously learned cue-target mapping is remapped. (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20565215     DOI: 10.1037/a0019129

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  12 in total

1.  On costs and benefits of n-2 repetitions in task switching: towards a behavioural marker of cognitive inhibition.

Authors:  James A Grange; Ion Juvina; George Houghton
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-02-11

2.  Cue response dissociates inhibitory processes: task identity information is related to backward inhibition but not to competitor rule suppression.

Authors:  Shirley Regev; Nachshon Meiran
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-01-13

3.  Task preparation and task inhibition: a comment on Koch, Gade, Schuch, & Philipp (2010).

Authors:  James A Grange; George Houghton
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-02

4.  Task switching with a 2:1 cue-to-task mapping: separating cue disambiguation from task-rule retrieval.

Authors:  Thomas Kleinsorge
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-05-27

5.  The neurophysiological basis of developmental changes during sequential cognitive flexibility between adolescents and adults.

Authors:  Franziska Giller; Rui Zhang; Veit Roessner; Christian Beste
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Inhibition, interference, and conflict in task switching.

Authors:  Russell E Costa; Frances J Friedrich
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-12

7.  Cue-type manipulation dissociates two types of task set inhibition: backward inhibition and competitor rule suppression.

Authors:  Shirley Regev; Nachshon Meiran
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-03-31

8.  Inhibitory Processes for Critical Situations - The Role of n-2 Task Repetition Costs in Human Multitasking Situations.

Authors:  Miriam Gade; Iring Koch
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2012-05-25       Impact factor: 4.566

9.  Task Dominance Determines Backward Inhibition in Task Switching.

Authors:  Kerstin Jost; Vera Hennecke; Iring Koch
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-05-10

10.  Out with the Old and in with the New--Is Backward Inhibition a Domain-Specific Process?

Authors:  Francesca Foti; Stefano Sdoia; Deny Menghini; Stefano Vicari; Laura Petrosini; Fabio Ferlazzo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.