BACKGROUND: The devastating impact of lymphedema on cancer survivors' quality of life has prompted consideration of several changes in medical and surgical care. Unfortunately, our understanding of the benefits gained from these approaches relative to their cost remains limited. This study was designed to estimate utilities for lymphedema and characterize how utilities differ between subgroups defined by lymphedema etiology and distribution. METHODS: A consecutive sample of 236 subjects with lymphedema seen at a lymphedema clinic completed both a time trade-off (TTO) exercise and the Euroqol 5D. Responses were adjusted in multivariate regression models for demographic factors, comorbidities, and lymphedema severity/location. RESULTS: Most participants (167 of 236, 71%) had lymphedema as a consequence of cancer treatment; 123 with breast cancer and upper extremity involvement. Mean TTO utility estimates were consistently higher than Euroqol 5D estimates. Unadjusted TTO (0.85; standard deviation [SD], 0.21) and Euroqol 5D (0.76; SD, 0.18) scores diminished with increasing lymphedema stage and patient body mass index (BMI). Adjusted utility scores were lowest in patients with cancer-related lower extremity lymphedema (TTO=0.82; SD, 0.04 and Euroqol 5D=0.80; SD, 0.03). Breast cancer patients also had lower adjusted Euroqol 5D scores (0.80; SD, 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Lymphedema-associated utilities are in the range of 0.80. Lower utilities are observed for patients with higher lymphedema stages, elevated BMI, and cancer-related lymphedema. Greater expenditures for the prevention and treatment of cancer-related lymphedema are warranted. Copyright (c) 2010 American Cancer Society.
BACKGROUND: The devastating impact of lymphedema on cancer survivors' quality of life has prompted consideration of several changes in medical and surgical care. Unfortunately, our understanding of the benefits gained from these approaches relative to their cost remains limited. This study was designed to estimate utilities for lymphedema and characterize how utilities differ between subgroups defined by lymphedema etiology and distribution. METHODS: A consecutive sample of 236 subjects with lymphedema seen at a lymphedema clinic completed both a time trade-off (TTO) exercise and the Euroqol 5D. Responses were adjusted in multivariate regression models for demographic factors, comorbidities, and lymphedema severity/location. RESULTS: Most participants (167 of 236, 71%) had lymphedema as a consequence of cancer treatment; 123 with breast cancer and upper extremity involvement. Mean TTO utility estimates were consistently higher than Euroqol 5D estimates. Unadjusted TTO (0.85; standard deviation [SD], 0.21) and Euroqol 5D (0.76; SD, 0.18) scores diminished with increasing lymphedema stage and patient body mass index (BMI). Adjusted utility scores were lowest in patients with cancer-related lower extremity lymphedema (TTO=0.82; SD, 0.04 and Euroqol 5D=0.80; SD, 0.03). Breast cancerpatients also had lower adjusted Euroqol 5D scores (0.80; SD, 0.02). CONCLUSIONS:Lymphedema-associated utilities are in the range of 0.80. Lower utilities are observed for patients with higher lymphedema stages, elevated BMI, and cancer-related lymphedema. Greater expenditures for the prevention and treatment of cancer-related lymphedema are warranted. Copyright (c) 2010 American Cancer Society.
Authors: G B Chapman; A S Elstein; T M Kuzel; R Sharifi; R B Nadler; A Andrews; C L Bennett Journal: Med Decis Making Date: 1998 Jul-Sep Impact factor: 2.583
Authors: Rudy S Suidan; Charlotte C Sun; Scott B Cantor; Andrea Mariani; Pamela T Soliman; Shannon N Westin; Karen H Lu; Sharon H Giordano; Larissa A Meyer Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2018-07 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Renate M Winkels; Kathleen M Sturgeon; Michael J Kallan; Lorraine T Dean; Zi Zhang; Margaret Evangelisti; Justin C Brown; David B Sarwer; Andrea B Troxel; Crystal Denlinger; Monica Laudermilk; Anna Fornash; Angela DeMichele; Lewis A Chodosh; Kathryn H Schmitz Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2017-07-21 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Nicole L Stout; Lucinda A Pfalzer; Barbara Springer; Ellen Levy; Charles L McGarvey; Jerome V Danoff; Lynn H Gerber; Peter W Soballe Journal: Phys Ther Date: 2011-09-15
Authors: Simona F Shaitelman; Kate D Cromwell; John C Rasmussen; Nicole L Stout; Jane M Armer; Bonnie B Lasinski; Janice N Cormier Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2014-11-19 Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Lisa Rydén; Ida Skarping; Kristoffer Nilsson; Looket Dihge; Adam Fridhammar; Mattias Ohlsson; Linnea Huss; Pär-Ola Bendahl; Katarina Steen Carlsson Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2022-07-05 Impact factor: 4.624
Authors: Hayley Standage; Alyssa R Hersh; Aaron Caughey; Matthew Taylor; John Vetto; Dale Han Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2020-09-19 Impact factor: 5.344