Literature DB >> 21921254

Breast cancer-related lymphedema: comparing direct costs of a prospective surveillance model and a traditional model of care.

Nicole L Stout1, Lucinda A Pfalzer, Barbara Springer, Ellen Levy, Charles L McGarvey, Jerome V Danoff, Lynn H Gerber, Peter W Soballe.   

Abstract

Secondary prevention involves monitoring and screening to prevent negative sequelae from chronic diseases such as cancer. Breast cancer treatment sequelae, such as lymphedema, may occur early or late and often negatively affect function. Secondary prevention through prospective physical therapy surveillance aids in early identification and treatment of breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL). Early intervention may reduce the need for intensive rehabilitation and may be cost saving. This perspective article compares a prospective surveillance model with a traditional model of impairment-based care and examines direct treatment costs associated with each program. Intervention and supply costs were estimated based on the Medicare 2009 physician fee schedule for 2 groups: (1) a prospective surveillance model group (PSM group) and (2) a traditional model group (TM group). The PSM group comprised all women with breast cancer who were receiving interval prospective surveillance, assuming that one third would develop early-stage BCRL. The prospective surveillance model includes the cost of screening all women plus the cost of intervention for early-stage BCRL. The TM group comprised women referred for BCRL treatment using a traditional model of referral based on late-stage lymphedema. The traditional model cost includes the direct cost of treating patients with advanced-stage lymphedema. The cost to manage early-stage BCRL per patient per year using a prospective surveillance model is $636.19. The cost to manage late-stage BCRL per patient per year using a traditional model is $3,124.92. The prospective surveillance model is emerging as the standard of care in breast cancer treatment and is a potential cost-saving mechanism for BCRL treatment. Further analysis of indirect costs and utility is necessary to assess cost-effectiveness. A shift in the paradigm of physical therapy toward a prospective surveillance model is warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21921254      PMCID: PMC3258414          DOI: 10.2522/ptj.20100167

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Ther        ISSN: 0031-9023


  72 in total

1.  A simple protocol for preventing falls and fractures in elderly individuals with musculoskeletal disease.

Authors:  K Kita; K Hujino; T Nasu; K Kawahara; Y Sunami
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-01-09       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Breast cancer-related lymphedema--what are the significant predictors and how they affect the severity of lymphedema?

Authors:  Atilla Soran; Gina D'Angelo; Mirsada Begovic; Figen Ardic; Ali Harlak; H Samuel Wieand; Victor G Vogel; Ronald R Johnson
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.431

Review 3.  Fundamentals of compression in the management of lymphoedema.

Authors:  Nina Linnitt; Rhian Davies
Journal:  Br J Nurs       Date:  2007 May 24-Jun 13

Review 4.  Barriers to rehabilitation following surgery for primary breast cancer.

Authors:  Andrea L Cheville; Julia Tchou
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2007-04-01       Impact factor: 3.454

Review 5.  Individualized preventive care in cardiac rehabilitation: adapted from AACVPR Award of Excellence Lecture, Charleston, WVa, October, 2006.

Authors:  Philip A Ades
Journal:  J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev       Date:  2007 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.081

6.  Arm morbidity and disability after breast cancer: new directions for care.

Authors:  Roanne L Thomas-Maclean; Thomas Hack; Winkle Kwan; Anna Towers; Baukje Miedema; Andrea Tilley
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.172

7.  The epidemiology of arm and hand swelling in premenopausal breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Electra D Paskett; Michelle J Naughton; Thomas P McCoy; L Douglas Case; Jill M Abbott
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 8.  The intersection of cancer and aging: establishing the need for breast cancer rehabilitation.

Authors:  Kathryn H Schmitz; Anne R Cappola; Carrie T Stricker; Carol Sweeney; Sandra A Norman
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 9.  Implementing a survivorship care plan for patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Patricia A Ganz; Erin E Hahn
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-02-10       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Exploring the economic impact of breast cancers during the 18 months following diagnosis.

Authors:  Louisa Gordon; Paul Scuffham; Sandi Hayes; Beth Newman
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.894

View more
  50 in total

1.  Prospective surveillance of breast cancer-related lymphoedema in the first-year post-surgery: feasibility and comparison of screening measures.

Authors:  J M Blaney; G McCollum; J Lorimer; J Bradley; R Kennedy; J P Rankin
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-11-16       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 2.  Rehabilitation interventions for the management of breast cancer-related lymphedema: developing a patient-centered, evidence-based plan of care throughout survivorship.

Authors:  Kathryn Ryans; Marisa Perdomo; Claire C Davies; Kimberly Levenhagen; Laura Gilchrist
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 4.442

Review 3.  Manual lymphatic drainage for lymphedema following breast cancer treatment.

Authors:  Jeanette Ezzo; Eric Manheimer; Margaret L McNeely; Doris M Howell; Robert Weiss; Karin I Johansson; Ting Bao; Linda Bily; Catherine M Tuppo; Anne F Williams; Didem Karadibak
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-05-21

4.  Screening for breast cancer-related lymphedema: the need for standardization.

Authors:  Jean O'Toole; Lauren S Jammallo; Cynthia L Miller; Melissa N Skolny; Michelle C Specht; Alphonse G Taghian
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2013-04-10

5.  Factors predicting adherence to risk management behaviors of women at increased risk for developing lymphedema.

Authors:  Kerry A Sherman; Suzanne M Miller; Pagona Roussi; Alan Taylor
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-06-27       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  The effect of prospective monitoring and early physiotherapy intervention on arm morbidity following surgery for breast cancer: a pilot study.

Authors:  Chiara Singh; Mary De Vera; Kristin L Campbell
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.037

7.  Function, Shoulder Motion, Pain, and Lymphedema in Breast Cancer With and Without Axillary Web Syndrome: An 18-Month Follow-Up.

Authors:  Linda A Koehler; David W Hunter; Anne H Blaes; Tufia C Haddad
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2018-06-01

8.  Hand Edema in Patients at Risk of Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema: Health Professionals Should Take Notice.

Authors:  Cheryl L Brunelle; Meyha N Swaroop; Melissa N Skolny; Maria S Asdourian; Hoda E Sayegh; Alphonse G Taghian
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2018-06-01

9.  Patient compliance with a health care provider referral for an occupational therapy lymphedema consult.

Authors:  Sally A Dominick; Loki Natarajan; John P Pierce; Hala Madanat; Lisa Madlensky
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 10.  Lymphedema following treatment for breast cancer: a new approach to an old problem.

Authors:  Jean O'Toole; Lauren S Jammallo; Melissa N Skolny; Cynthia L Miller; Krista Elliott; Michelle C Specht; Alphonse G Taghian
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  2013-06-16       Impact factor: 6.312

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.