Literature DB >> 20563802

Magnetic resonance arthrography of the shoulder: accuracy of gadolinium versus saline for rotator cuff and labral pathology.

Clyde A Helms1, Shane J McGonegle, Emily N Vinson, Michael B Whiteside.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the necessity of intra-articular gadolinium versus saline alone in magnetic resonance arthrography (MRA) of the shoulder.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our database was reviewed for 100 consecutive shoulder MRA examinations performed between January 2007 and December 2007. Patient information was blinded and images were retrospectively reviewed by at least two radiologists with dedicated musculoskeletal training. T2-weighted (T2W) images were initially analyzed in isolation to simulate MRA with saline alone. After a delay, the full study was analyzed including T1-weighted (T1W) and T2W images. If there was a significant discordance between the two analyses with regard to rotator cuff or labral pathology, the study was again reviewed by all evaluators in consensus to determine if the T1W images offered additional diagnostic information and increased diagnostic confidence.
RESULTS: Of the 100 MRA examinations, there were 15 discordant cases. Two cases were discordant with regard to rotator cuff pathology and 13 were discordant on the basis of labral pathology. When the discordant cases were reviewed in consensus, the T2W images appeared to display rotator cuff and labral pathology as definitively as the T1W images. Interobserver and intraobserver variability was favored to have played a role in causing the discordances.
CONCLUSIONS: MRA of the shoulder performed with joint distention provided by saline alone appears to offer equivalent diagnostic information to MRA performed with gadolinium enhancement. This protocol modification improves efficiency by eliminating several image series and provides a small cost savings by eliminating gadolinium.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20563802     DOI: 10.1007/s00256-010-0978-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Skeletal Radiol        ISSN: 0364-2348            Impact factor:   2.199


  15 in total

1.  Shoulder instability: accuracy of MR imaging performed after surgery in depicting recurrent injury--initial findings.

Authors:  Steven C Wagner; Mark E Schweitzer; William B Morrison; John M Fenlin; Arthur R Bartolozzi
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  MR arthrography of the glenohumeral joint: two concentrations of gadoteridol versus Ringer solution as the intraarticular contrast material.

Authors:  C A Binkert; M Zanetti; C Gerber; J Hodler
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Partial thickness rotator cuff tears: results of arthroscopic treatment.

Authors:  S J Snyder; A F Pachelli; W Del Pizzo; M J Friedman; R D Ferkel; G Pattee
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.772

4.  Partial-thickness tears of the rotator cuff. A clinicopathological review based on 66 surgically verified cases.

Authors:  H Fukuda; K Hamada; T Nakajima; N Yamada; A Tomonaga; M Goto
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  MR imaging of the rotator cuff tendon: interobserver agreement and analysis of interpretive errors.

Authors:  S M Balich; R C Sheley; T R Brown; D D Sauser; S F Quinn
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  MR arthrography of the shoulder: comparison with conventional MR imaging.

Authors:  B Flannigan; S Kursunoglu-Brahme; S Snyder; R Karzel; W Del Pizzo; D Resnick
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  MR arthrography of partial thickness tears of the undersurface of the rotator cuff: an arthroscopic correlation.

Authors:  Keith Meister; Jim Thesing; William J Montgomery; Peter A Indelicato; Steve Walczak; William Fontenot
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2003-09-26       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Shoulder MR arthrography: which patient group benefits most?

Authors:  Thomas Magee; David Williams; Nisha Mani
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Rotator cuff: evaluation with fat-suppressed MR arthrography.

Authors:  W E Palmer; J H Brown; D I Rosenthal
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Saline magnetic resonance arthrography in the evaluation of glenohumeral instability.

Authors:  P F Tirman; A E Stauffer; J V Crues; R M Turner; W M Nottage; W E Schobert; B D Rubin; D L Janzen; R C Linares
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.772

View more
  5 in total

1.  A comparison of saline and gadolinium shoulder MR arthrography to arthroscopy.

Authors:  Adam D Singer; Jeffrey Rosenthal; Monica Umpierrez; Yi Guo; Felix Gonzalez; Eric Wagner
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Image quality of hip MR arthrography with intra-articular injection of hyaluronic acid versus gadolinium-based contrast agent in patients with femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  Filippo Randelli; Elisabetta Antonia Nocerino; Luca Nicosia; Marco Alì; Caterina Beatrice Monti; Francesco Sardanelli; Alberto Aliprandi
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 3.  The evolution of articular cartilage imaging and its impact on clinical practice.

Authors:  Carl S Winalski; Prabhakar Rajiah
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  MR arthrography of the shoulder: tolerance evaluation of four different injection techniques.

Authors:  Evangelos Perdikakis; Eleni Drakonaki; Thomas Maris; Apostolos Karantanas
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2012-10-14       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Identification of Naturally Occurring Cartilage Damage in the Equine Distal Interphalangeal Joint Using Low-Field Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Magnetic Resonance Arthrography.

Authors:  Claudia van Zadelhoff; Tobias Schwarz; Sionagh Smith; Antoine Engerand; Sarah Taylor
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2020-01-28
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.