Literature DB >> 20562708

Optimal enhancement configuration of silica nanoparticles for ultrasound imaging and automatic detection at conventional diagnostic frequencies.

Sergio Casciaro1, Francesco Conversano, Andrea Ragusa, Maria Ada Malvindi, Roberto Franchini, Antonio Greco, Teresa Pellegrino, Giuseppe Gigli.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To experimentally investigate the acoustical behavior of silica nanoparticles within conventional diagnostic ultrasound fields and to determine a suitable configuration, in terms of particle size and concentration, for their employment as targetable contrast agents. We also assessed the effectiveness of a novel method for automatic detection of targeted silica nanoparticles for future tissue typing applications.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Silica nanospheres of variable size (160, 330, and 660 nm in diameter) and concentration (10¹⁰-10¹³ part/mL) were dispersed in different custom-designed agarose-based gel samples and imaged at 7.5 MHz with a conventional echograph linked to a research platform for radiofrequency signal acquisition. Off-line analysis included evaluation of backscattered ultrasound amplitude, image brightness, and nanoparticle automatic detection through radiofrequency signal processing.
RESULTS: Amplitude of nanoparticle-backscattered signals linearly increased with particle number concentration, but image brightness did not show the same trend, because the logarithmic compression caused the reaching of a "plateau" where brightness remained almost constant for further increments in particle concentration. On the other hand, both backscatter amplitude and image brightness showed significant increments when particle diameter was increased. Taking into account particle size constraints for tumor targeting (pore size of tumor endothelium and trapping effects because of reticulo-endothelial system limit the dimension of effectively employable particles to less than 380 nm), a suitable compromise is represented by the employment of 330-nm silica nanospheres at a concentration of about 1 to 2 x 10¹¹ part/mL. These particles, in fact, showed the best combination of number concentration and diameter value to obtain an effective enhancement on conventional echographic images. Furthermore, also the sensitivity of the developed method for automatic nanoparticle detection had a maximum (72.8%) with 330-nm particles, whereas it was lower with both bigger and smaller particles (being equal to 64.1% and 17.5%, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Silica nanoparticles at a diameter of about 330 nm are very promising contrast agents for ultrasound imaging and specific tumor targeting at conventional diagnostic frequencies, being in particular automatically detectable with high sensitivity already at low doses. Future studies will be carried out to assess the acoustic behavior of nanoparticles with different geometries/sizes and to improve sensitivity of the automatic detection algorithm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20562708     DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181e6f42f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Radiol        ISSN: 0020-9996            Impact factor:   6.016


  24 in total

1.  Synthesis and surface functionalization of silica nanoparticles for nanomedicine.

Authors:  Alexander Liberman; Natalie Mendez; William C Trogler; Andrew C Kummel
Journal:  Surf Sci Rep       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 12.267

2.  Theranostic applications: Non-ionizing cellular and molecular imaging through innovative nanosystems for early diagnosis and therapy.

Authors:  Sergio Casciaro
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2011-10-28

3.  Functionalized multiwalled carbon nanotubes as ultrasound contrast agents.

Authors:  Lucia Gemma Delogu; Gianpaolo Vidili; Enrica Venturelli; Cécilia Ménard-Moyon; Maria Antonietta Zoroddu; Giovannantonio Pilo; Paola Nicolussi; Ciriaco Ligios; Davide Bedognetti; Francesco Sgarrella; Roberto Manetti; Alberto Bianco
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-09-24       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Progress in atherosclerotic plaque imaging.

Authors:  Giulia Soloperto; Sergio Casciaro
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2012-08-28

5.  Exosome-like silica nanoparticles: a novel ultrasound contrast agent for stem cell imaging.

Authors:  Fang Chen; Ming Ma; Junxin Wang; Fang Wang; Shi-Xiong Chern; Eric Ruike Zhao; Anamik Jhunjhunwala; Sean Darmadi; Hangrong Chen; Jesse V Jokerst
Journal:  Nanoscale       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 7.790

Review 6.  Echographic imaging of tumoral cells through novel nanosystems for image diagnosis.

Authors:  Marco Di Paola; Fernanda Chiriacò; Giulia Soloperto; Francesco Conversano; Sergio Casciaro
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2014-07-28

Review 7.  Ultrasound imaging beyond the vasculature with new generation contrast agents.

Authors:  Reshani H Perera; Christopher Hernandez; Haoyan Zhou; Pavan Kota; Alan Burke; Agata A Exner
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol       Date:  2015-01-08

8.  Sol-gel synthesis and electrospraying of biodegradable (P2O5)55-(CaO)30-(Na2O)15 glass nanospheres as a transient contrast agent for ultrasound stem cell imaging.

Authors:  Farzad Foroutan; Jesse V Jokerst; Sanjiv S Gambhir; Ophir Vermesh; Hae-Won Kim; Jonathan C Knowles
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 15.881

Review 9.  Hurdles in treating Hurler disease: potential routes to achieve a "real" cure.

Authors:  Brigitte T A van den Broek; Jaap van Doorn; Charlotte V Hegeman; Stefan Nierkens; Caroline A Lindemans; Nanda Verhoeven-Duif; Jaap Jan Boelens; Peter M van Hasselt
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2020-06-23

10.  Three-dimensional subharmonic ultrasound imaging in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  John R Eisenbrey; Anush Sridharan; Priscilla Machado; Hongjia Zhao; Valgerdur G Halldorsdottir; Jaydev K Dave; Ji-Bin Liu; Suhyun Park; Scott Dianis; Kirk Wallace; Kai E Thomenius; Flemming Forsberg
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 3.173

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.