Literature DB >> 20562194

Improvement of risk prediction by genomic profiling: reclassification measures versus the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.

Raluca Mihaescu1, Moniek van Zitteren, Mandy van Hoek, Eric J G Sijbrands, André G Uitterlinden, Jacqueline C M Witteman, Albert Hofman, M G Myriam Hunink, Cornelia M van Duijn, A Cecile J W Janssens.   

Abstract

Reclassification is observed even when there is no or minimal improvement in the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and it is unclear whether it indicates improved clinical utility. The authors investigated total reclassification, net reclassification improvement, and integrated discrimination improvement for different DeltaAUC using empirical and simulated data. Empirical analyses compared prediction of type 2 diabetes risk based on age, sex, and body mass index with prediction updated with 18 established genetic risk factors. Simulated data were used to investigate measures of reclassification against DeltaAUCs of 0.005, 0.05, and 0.10. Total reclassification and net reclassification improvement were calculated for all possible cutoff values. The AUC of type 2 diabetes risk prediction improved from 0.63 to 0.66 when 18 polymorphisms were added, whereas total reclassification ranged from 0% to 22.5% depending on the cutoff value chosen. In the simulation study, total reclassification, net reclassification improvement, and integrated discrimination improvement increased with higher DeltaAUC. When DeltaAUC was low (0.005), net reclassification improvement values were close to zero, integrated discrimination improvement was 0.08% (P > 0.05), but total reclassification ranged from 0 to 6.7%. Reclassification increases with increasing AUC but predominantly varies with the cutoff values chosen. Reclassification observed in the absence of AUC increase is unlikely to improve clinical utility.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20562194     DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwq122

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  31 in total

1.  Inclusion of gene-gene and gene-environment interactions unlikely to dramatically improve risk prediction for complex diseases.

Authors:  Hugues Aschard; Jinbo Chen; Marilyn C Cornelis; Lori B Chibnik; Elizabeth W Karlson; Peter Kraft
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Application of net reclassification index to non-nested and point-based risk prediction models: a review.

Authors:  Laine E Thomas; Emily C O'Brien; Jonathan P Piccini; Ralph B D'Agostino; Michael J Pencina
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 29.983

3.  Evaluating the incremental value of new biomarkers with integrated discrimination improvement.

Authors:  Kathleen F Kerr; Robyn L McClelland; Elizabeth R Brown; Thomas Lumley
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2011-06-14       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Assessing improvement in disease prediction using net reclassification improvement: impact of risk cut-offs and number of risk categories.

Authors:  Kristin Mühlenbruch; Alexandros Heraclides; Ewout W Steyerberg; Hans-Georg Joost; Heiner Boeing; Matthias B Schulze
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 8.082

5.  Net reclassification improvement: a link between statistics and clinical practice.

Authors:  Maarten J G Leening; Nancy R Cook
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2013-01-05       Impact factor: 8.082

6.  Further insight into the incremental value of new markers: the interpretation of performance measures and the importance of clinical context.

Authors:  Kathleen F Kerr; Aasthaa Bansal; Margaret S Pepe
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 7.  Developing risk prediction models for kidney injury and assessing incremental value for novel biomarkers.

Authors:  Kathleen F Kerr; Allison Meisner; Heather Thiessen-Philbrook; Steven G Coca; Chirag R Parikh
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 8.237

8.  Performance of the Net Reclassification Improvement for Nonnested Models and a Novel Percentile-Based Alternative.

Authors:  Shannon B McKearnan; Julian Wolfson; David M Vock; Gabriela Vazquez-Benitez; Patrick J O'Connor
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 9.  Personalized cardiovascular medicine: concepts and methodological considerations.

Authors:  Henry Völzke; Carsten O Schmidt; Sebastian E Baumeister; Till Ittermann; Glenn Fung; Janina Krafczyk-Korth; Wolfgang Hoffmann; Matthias Schwab; Henriette E Meyer zu Schwabedissen; Marcus Dörr; Stephan B Felix; Wolfgang Lieb; Heyo K Kroemer
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 32.419

10.  Development and evaluation of a genetic risk score for obesity.

Authors:  Daniel W Belsky; Terrie E Moffitt; Karen Sugden; Benjamin Williams; Renate Houts; Jeanette McCarthy; Avshalom Caspi
Journal:  Biodemography Soc Biol       Date:  2013
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.