Literature DB >> 20561998

Protein structure prediction: do hydrogen bonding and water-mediated interactions suffice?

Vanessa Oklejas1, Chenghang Zong, Garegin A Papoian, Peter G Wolynes.   

Abstract

The many-body physics of hydrogen bond formation in alpha-helices of globular proteins was investigated using a simple physics-based model. Specifically, a context-sensitive hydrogen bond potential, which depends on residue identity and degree of solvent exposure, was used in the framework of the Associated Memory Hamiltonian codes developed previously but without using local-sequence structure matches ("memories"). Molecular dynamics simulations employing the energy function using the context-sensitive hydrogen bond potential alone (the "amnesiac" model) were used to generate low energy structures for three alpha-helical test proteins. The resulting structures were compared to both the X-ray crystal structures of the test proteins and the results obtained using the full Associated Memory Hamiltonian previously used. Results show that the amnesiac Hamiltonian was able to generate structures with reasonably high structural similarity (Q approximately 0.4) to that of the native protein but only with the use of predicted secondary structure information encoding local steric signals. Low energy structures obtained using the amnesiac Hamiltonian without any a priori secondary structure information had considerably less similarity to the native protein structures (Q approximately 0.3). Both sets of results utilizing the amnesiac Hamiltonian are poorer than when local-sequence structure matches are used. Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20561998      PMCID: PMC4145820          DOI: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2010.05.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods        ISSN: 1046-2023            Impact factor:   3.608


  18 in total

1.  Optimizing physical energy functions for protein folding.

Authors:  Yoshimi Fujitsuka; Shoji Takada; Zaida A Luthey-Schulten; Peter G Wolynes
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2004-01-01

2.  Protein Structure Prediction:  The Next Generation.

Authors:  Michael C Prentiss; Corey Hardin; Michael P Eastwood; Chenghang Zong; Peter G Wolynes
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 6.006

3.  Role of topology, nonadditivity, and water-mediated interactions in predicting the structures of alpha/beta proteins.

Authors:  Chenghang Zong; Garegin A Papoian; Johan Ulander; Peter G Wolynes
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2006-04-19       Impact factor: 15.419

4.  P versus Q: structural reaction coordinates capture protein folding on smooth landscapes.

Authors:  Samuel S Cho; Yaakov Levy; Peter G Wolynes
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-01-09       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Toward protein tertiary structure recognition by means of associative memory hamiltonians.

Authors:  M S Friedrichs; P G Wolynes
Journal:  Science       Date:  1989-10-20       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Restriction versus guidance in protein structure prediction.

Authors:  Joseph A Hegler; Joachim Lätzer; Amarda Shehu; Cecilia Clementi; Peter G Wolynes
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-08-24       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Protein structure alignment by incremental combinatorial extension (CE) of the optimal path.

Authors:  I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Protein Eng       Date:  1998-09

8.  JPred: a consensus secondary structure prediction server.

Authors:  J A Cuff; M E Clamp; A S Siddiqui; M Finlay; G J Barton
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  Self-consistently optimized energy functions for protein structure prediction by molecular dynamics.

Authors:  K K Koretke; Z Luthey-Schulten; P G Wolynes
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-03-17       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Toward an outline of the topography of a realistic protein-folding funnel.

Authors:  J N Onuchic; P G Wolynes; Z Luthey-Schulten; N D Socci
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-04-11       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  4 in total

1.  Coevolutionary signals across protein lineages help capture multiple protein conformations.

Authors:  Faruck Morcos; Biman Jana; Terence Hwa; José N Onuchic
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  AWSEM-MD: protein structure prediction using coarse-grained physical potentials and bioinformatically based local structure biasing.

Authors:  Aram Davtyan; Nicholas P Schafer; Weihua Zheng; Cecilia Clementi; Peter G Wolynes; Garegin A Papoian
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 2.991

3.  Learning To Fold Proteins Using Energy Landscape Theory.

Authors:  N P Schafer; B L Kim; W Zheng; P G Wolynes
Journal:  Isr J Chem       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.333

4.  Evolutionary-inspired probabilistic search for enhancing sampling of local minima in the protein energy surface.

Authors:  Brian S Olson; Amarda Shehu
Journal:  Proteome Sci       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 2.480

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.