Literature DB >> 20561000

Conservation planning when costs are uncertain.

Josie Carwardine1, Kerrie A Wilson, Stefan A Hajkowicz, Robert J Smith, Carissa J Klein, Matt Watts, Hugh P Possingham.   

Abstract

Spatially explicit information on the financial costs of conservation actions can improve the ability of conservation planning to achieve ecological and economic objectives, but the magnitude of this improvement may depend on the accuracy of the cost estimates. Data on costs of conservation actions are inherently uncertain. For example, the cost of purchasing a property for addition to a protected-area network depends on the individual landholder's preferences, values, and aspirations, all of which vary in space and time, and the effect of this uncertainty on the conservation priority of a site is relatively untested. We investigated the sensitivity of the conservation priority of sites to uncertainty in cost estimates. We explored scenarios for expanding (four-fold) the protected-area network in Queensland, Australia to represent a range of vegetation types, species, and abiotic environments, while minimizing the cost of purchasing new properties. We estimated property costs for 17, 790 10 × 10 km sites with data on unimproved land values. We systematically changed property costs and noted how these changes affected conservation priority of a site. The sensitivity of the priority of a site to changes in cost data was largely dependent on a site's importance for meeting conservation targets. Sites that were essential or unimportant for meeting targets maintained high or low priorities, respectively, regardless of cost estimates. Sites of intermediate conservation priority were sensitive to property costs and represented the best option for efficiency gains, especially if they could be purchased at a lower price than anticipated. Thus, uncertainty in cost estimates did not impede the use of cost data in conservation planning, and information on the sensitivity of the conservation priority of a site to estimates of the price of land can be used to inform strategic conservation planning before the actual price of the land is known.
© 2010 University of Queensland. Journal compilation © 2010 Society for Conservation Biology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20561000     DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01535.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conserv Biol        ISSN: 0888-8892            Impact factor:   6.560


  9 in total

1.  Global distribution and conservation of marine mammals.

Authors:  Sandra Pompa; Paul R Ehrlich; Gerardo Ceballos
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Protecting the global ocean for biodiversity, food and climate.

Authors:  Enric Sala; Juan Mayorga; Darcy Bradley; Reniel B Cabral; Trisha B Atwood; Arnaud Auber; William Cheung; Christopher Costello; Francesco Ferretti; Alan M Friedlander; Steven D Gaines; Cristina Garilao; Whitney Goodell; Benjamin S Halpern; Audra Hinson; Kristin Kaschner; Kathleen Kesner-Reyes; Fabien Leprieur; Jennifer McGowan; Lance E Morgan; David Mouillot; Juliano Palacios-Abrantes; Hugh P Possingham; Kristin D Rechberger; Boris Worm; Jane Lubchenco
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 69.504

3.  Quantifying the Short-Term Costs of Conservation Interventions for Fishers at Lake Alaotra, Madagascar.

Authors:  Andrea P C Wallace; E J Milner-Gulland; Julia P G Jones; Nils Bunnefeld; Richard Young; Emily Nicholson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Ecosystem services and opportunity costs shift spatial priorities for conserving forest biodiversity.

Authors:  Matthias Schröter; Graciela M Rusch; David N Barton; Stefan Blumentrath; Björn Nordén
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Optimising Land-Sea Management for Inshore Coral Reefs.

Authors:  Ben L Gilby; Andrew D Olds; Rod M Connolly; Tim Stevens; Christopher J Henderson; Paul S Maxwell; Ian R Tibbetts; David S Schoeman; David Rissik; Thomas A Schlacher
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Optimizing conservation planning for multiple cohabiting species.

Authors:  Yicheng Wang; Qiaoling Fang; Sahan T M Dissanayake; Hayri Önal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Navigating the complexities of coordinated conservation along the river Nile.

Authors:  J R Allan; N Levin; K R Jones; S Abdullah; J Hongoh; V Hermoso; S Kark
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 14.136

8.  Comparing Methods for Prioritising Protected Areas for Investment: A Case Study Using Madagascar's Dry Forest Reptiles.

Authors:  Charlie J Gardner; Christopher J Raxworthy; Kristian Metcalfe; Achille P Raselimanana; Robert J Smith; Zoe G Davies
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 3.752

9.  Bird community conservation and carbon offsets in western North America.

Authors:  Richard Schuster; Tara G Martin; Peter Arcese
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.