| Literature DB >> 33731930 |
Enric Sala1, Juan Mayorga2,3, Darcy Bradley3, Reniel B Cabral3, Trisha B Atwood4, Arnaud Auber5, William Cheung6, Christopher Costello3, Francesco Ferretti7, Alan M Friedlander2,8, Steven D Gaines3, Cristina Garilao9, Whitney Goodell2,8, Benjamin S Halpern10, Audra Hinson4, Kristin Kaschner11, Kathleen Kesner-Reyes12, Fabien Leprieur13, Jennifer McGowan14, Lance E Morgan15, David Mouillot13, Juliano Palacios-Abrantes6, Hugh P Possingham16, Kristin D Rechberger17, Boris Worm18, Jane Lubchenco19.
Abstract
The ocean contains unique biodiversity, provides valuable food resources and is a major sink for anthropogenic carbon. Marine protected areas (MPAs) are an effective tool for restoring ocean biodiversity and ecosystem services1,2, but at present only 2.7% of the ocean is highly protected3. This low level of ocean protection is due largely to conflicts with fisheries and other extractive uses. To address this issue, here we developed a conservation planning framework to prioritize highly protected MPAs in places that would result in multiple benefits today and in the future. We find that a substantial increase in ocean protection could have triple benefits, by protecting biodiversity, boosting the yield of fisheries and securing marine carbon stocks that are at risk from human activities. Our results show that most coastal nations contain priority areas that can contribute substantially to achieving these three objectives of biodiversity protection, food provision and carbon storage. A globally coordinated effort could be nearly twice as efficient as uncoordinated, national-level conservation planning. Our flexible prioritization framework could help to inform both national marine spatial plans4 and global targets for marine conservation, food security and climate action.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33731930 DOI: 10.1038/s41586-021-03371-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nature ISSN: 0028-0836 Impact factor: 69.504