Literature DB >> 20560721

Effect of cold nerve allograft preservation on antigen presentation and rejection.

Wilson Z Ray1, Santosh S Kale, Rahul Kasukurthi, Esther M Papp, Philip J Johnson, Katherine B Santosa, Ying Yan, Daniel A Hunter, Susan E Mackinnon, Thomas H Tung.   

Abstract

OBJECT: Nerve allotransplantation provides a temporary scaffold for host nerve regeneration and allows for the reconstruction of significant segmental nerve injuries. The need for systemic immunosuppression, however, limits the current clinical utilization of nerve allografts, although this need is reduced by the practice of cold nerve allograft preservation. Activation of T cells in response to alloantigen presentation occurs in the context of donor antigen presenting cells (direct pathway) or host antigen-presenting cells (indirect pathway). The relative role of each pathway in eliciting an alloimmune response and its potential for rejection of the nerve allograft model has not previously been investigated. The objective of this investigation was to study the effect of progressive periods of cold nerve allograft preservation on antigen presentation and the alloimmune response.
METHODS: The authors used wild type C57Bl/6 (B6), BALB/c, and major histocompatibility Class II-deficient (MHC-/-) C57Bl/6 mice as both nerve allograft recipients and donors. A nonvascularized nerve allograft was used to reconstruct a 1-cm sciatic nerve gap. Progressive cold preservation of donor nerve allografts was used. Quantitative assessment was made after 3 weeks using nerve histomorphometry.
RESULTS: The donor-recipient combination lacking a functional direct pathway (BALB/c host with MHC-/- graft) rejected nerve allografts as vigorously as wild-type animals. Without an intact indirect pathway (MHC-/- host with BALB/c graft), axonal regeneration was improved (p < 0.052). One week of cold allograft preservation did not improve regeneration to any significant degree in any of the donor-recipient combinations. Four weeks of cold preservation did improve regeneration significantly (p < 0.05) for all combinations compared with wild-type animals without pretreatment. However, only in the presence of an intact indirect pathway (no direct pathway) did 4 weeks of cold preservation improve regeneration significantly compared with 1 week and no preservation in the same donor-recipient combination.
CONCLUSIONS: The indirect pathway may be the predominant route of antigen presentation in the unmodified host response to the nerve allograft. Prolonged duration of cold nerve allograft preservation is required to significantly attenuate the rejection response. Cold preservation for 4 weeks improves nerve regeneration with a significant effect on indirect allorecognition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20560721      PMCID: PMC3010307          DOI: 10.3171/2010.5.JNS10111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  25 in total

Review 1.  Direct and indirect recognition: the role of MHC antigens in graft rejection.

Authors:  D S Gould; H Auchincloss
Journal:  Immunol Today       Date:  1999-02

2.  Immune response and neurotrophic factor interactions in peripheral nerve transplants.

Authors:  A K Gulati
Journal:  Acta Haematol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.195

3.  Cold preserved nerve allografts: changes in basement membrane, viability, immunogenicity, and regeneration.

Authors:  P J Evans; S E Mackinnon; A D Levi; J A Wade; D A Hunter; Y Nakao; R Midha
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.217

Review 4.  Antigen processing and presentation in transplantation.

Authors:  H Auchincloss; H Sultan
Journal:  Curr Opin Immunol       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 7.486

5.  Cellular mechanisms of rejection and regeneration in peripheral nerve allografts.

Authors:  F Lassner; E Schaller; G Steinhoff; K Wonigeit; G F Walter; A Berger
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 4.939

6.  Ultraviolet B radiation converts Langerhans cells from immunogenic to tolerogenic antigen-presenting cells. Induction of specific clonal anergy in CD4+ T helper 1 cells.

Authors:  J C Simon; R E Tigelaar; P R Bergstresser; D Edelbaum; P D Cruz
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1991-01-15       Impact factor: 5.422

Review 7.  Indirect presentation of MHC antigens in transplantation.

Authors:  D A Shoskes; K J Wood
Journal:  Immunol Today       Date:  1994-01

8.  Cold storage of peripheral nerves: an in vitro assay of cell viability and function.

Authors:  A D Levi; P J Evans; S E Mackinnon; R P Bunge
Journal:  Glia       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 7.452

9.  Clinical application of peripheral nerve transplantation.

Authors:  S E Mackinnon; A R Hudson
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 10.  Nerve allotransplantation following severe tibial nerve injury. Case report.

Authors:  S E Mackinnon
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 5.115

View more
  3 in total

1.  Mass spectrometry comparison of nerve allograft decellularization processes.

Authors:  Alonda C Pollins; Justine S Kim; Richard B Boyer; Wesley P Thayer
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Limited regeneration in long acellular nerve allografts is associated with increased Schwann cell senescence.

Authors:  Maryam Saheb-Al-Zamani; Ying Yan; Scott J Farber; Daniel A Hunter; Piyaraj Newton; Matthew D Wood; Sheila A Stewart; Philip J Johnson; Susan E Mackinnon
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 5.330

Review 3.  The Role of Current Techniques and Concepts in Peripheral Nerve Repair.

Authors:  K S Houschyar; A Momeni; M N Pyles; J Y Cha; Z N Maan; D Duscher; O S Jew; F Siemers; J van Schoonhoven
Journal:  Plast Surg Int       Date:  2016-01-20
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.