Literature DB >> 20558202

Recording and analysis of electrically evoked compound action potentials (ECAPs) with MED-EL cochlear implants and different artifact reduction strategies in Matlab.

Andreas Bahmer1, Otto Peter, Uwe Baumann.   

Abstract

Electrically evoked compound action potentials (ECAPs) are used in auditory research to evaluate the response of the auditory nerve to electrical stimulation. Animal preparations are typically used for the recording. With the introduction of a new generation of cochlear implants, however it is possible to record the response of the auditory nerve to electrical stimulation in humans as well, which is used in the clinic to test whether the implant works properly and whether the auditory nerve is responsive. Currently, ECAPs are used to estimate thresholds for speech processor programs. In addition, ECAPs recordings allow new research to be addressed, e.g., to evaluate enhanced electrical stimulation patterns. Research platforms are required to test user-defined stimuli and algorithms for the ECAPs analysis. Clinical fitting software that records ECAPs is not flexible enough for this purpose. To enable a larger group of scientists to pursue research in this field, we introduce a flexible setup that allows to change stimulation and recording parameters. ECAP recording and analysis software was developed in Matlab (The Mathworks, Inc.) for standard PC, using a National instruments (PCI-6533, National Instruments, Austin, TX) card and a Research Interface Box 2 (RIB2, Department of Ion Physics and Applied Physics at the University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria) for MED-EL cochlear implants. ECAP recordings of a human subject with three different artifact reduction methods (alternating, Miller modified masker-probe, triphasic pulses) are presented and compared. (c) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20558202     DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2010.06.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci Methods        ISSN: 0165-0270            Impact factor:   2.390


  9 in total

1.  A Comparison of Alternating Polarity and Forward Masking Artifact-Reduction Methods to Resolve the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential.

Authors:  Jacquelyn L Baudhuin; Michelle L Hughes; Jenny L Goehring
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 2.  Assessment of responses to cochlear implant stimulation at different levels of the auditory pathway.

Authors:  Paul J Abbas; Carolyn J Brown
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Recording evoked potentials during deep brain stimulation: development and validation of instrumentation to suppress the stimulus artefact.

Authors:  A R Kent; W M Grill
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 5.379

4.  Development of a multichannel vestibular prosthesis prototype by modification of a commercially available cochlear implant.

Authors:  Nicolas S Valentin; Kristin N Hageman; Chenkai Dai; Charles C Della Santina; Gene Y Fridman
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 3.802

5.  In-vitro characterization of a cochlear implant system for recording of evoked compound action potentials.

Authors:  Christian Neustetter; Matthias Zangerl; Philipp Spitzer; Clemens Zierhofer
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 2.819

6.  Nonhuman primate vestibuloocular reflex responses to prosthetic vestibular stimulation are robust to pulse timing errors caused by temporal discretization.

Authors:  Peter J Boutros; Nicolas S Valentin; Kristin N Hageman; Chenkai Dai; Dale Roberts; Charles C Della Santina
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 2.974

7.  Characterization of Cochlear, Vestibular and Cochlear-Vestibular Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potentials in Patients with a Vestibulo-Cochlear Implant.

Authors:  T A K Nguyen; Samuel Cavuscens; Maurizio Ranieri; Konrad Schwarz; Nils Guinand; Raymond van de Berg; Thomas van den Boogert; Floor Lucieer; Marc van Hoof; Jean-Philippe Guyot; Herman Kingma; Silvestro Micera; Angelica Perez Fornos
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  Direct Cochlear Recordings in Humans Show a Theta Rhythmic Modulation of Auditory Nerve Activity by Selective Attention.

Authors:  Quirin Gehmacher; Patrick Reisinger; Thomas Hartmann; Thomas Keintzel; Sebastian Rösch; Konrad Schwarz; Nathan Weisz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Electrically evoked compound action potential artifact rejection by independent component analysis: technique validation.

Authors:  Idrick Akhoun; Colette M McKay; Wael El-Deredy
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-04-28       Impact factor: 3.208

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.