INTRODUCTION: Recently published articles have established that a substantial number of cancer patients utilize the Internet to gather information about their respective diagnoses. The challenges for medical providers include understanding the prevalence and characteristics of patients using the Internet, reasons for Internet use, and the effectiveness of currently available websites in providing useful health-related information to patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Adults with cancer were asked to complete a self-administered, anonymous, 21-item questionnaire upon registration at the Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center at the Washington University School of Medicine. RESULTS: There were 500 respondents (mean age 58 years (range 18-90), 83% Caucasian and 15% African-American). Three hundred ninety-eight participants (80%) reported access to the Internet, and 315 (63%) reported searching for information about cancer on the Internet. Patients accessing the Internet for cancer information were younger than those who did not (median age 56 vs. 63 years; p < 0.001). Internet usage for cancer information also differed by race (p < 0.0001) and education (p < 0.0001). Among patients who searched the Internet for cancer information, 13.3% of patients had their decisions towards treatments affected or changed, and 11.4% of patients had their choice in physicians affected or changed because of Internet use; 23.5% of patients sought information on clinical trials, and 9.5% of patients were influenced or changed their decision regarding clinical trial enrollment due to Internet information. DISCUSSION: Approximately two thirds of patients with cancer used the Internet to obtain information about their disease. Factors affecting Internet use for cancer information included age, race, and education. Clinical decisions can be affected by Internet use.
INTRODUCTION: Recently published articles have established that a substantial number of cancerpatients utilize the Internet to gather information about their respective diagnoses. The challenges for medical providers include understanding the prevalence and characteristics of patients using the Internet, reasons for Internet use, and the effectiveness of currently available websites in providing useful health-related information to patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Adults with cancer were asked to complete a self-administered, anonymous, 21-item questionnaire upon registration at the Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center at the Washington University School of Medicine. RESULTS: There were 500 respondents (mean age 58 years (range 18-90), 83% Caucasian and 15% African-American). Three hundred ninety-eight participants (80%) reported access to the Internet, and 315 (63%) reported searching for information about cancer on the Internet. Patients accessing the Internet for cancer information were younger than those who did not (median age 56 vs. 63 years; p < 0.001). Internet usage for cancer information also differed by race (p < 0.0001) and education (p < 0.0001). Among patients who searched the Internet for cancer information, 13.3% of patients had their decisions towards treatments affected or changed, and 11.4% of patients had their choice in physicians affected or changed because of Internet use; 23.5% of patients sought information on clinical trials, and 9.5% of patients were influenced or changed their decision regarding clinical trial enrollment due to Internet information. DISCUSSION: Approximately two thirds of patients with cancer used the Internet to obtain information about their disease. Factors affecting Internet use for cancer information included age, race, and education. Clinical decisions can be affected by Internet use.
Authors: G K Berland; M N Elliott; L S Morales; J I Algazy; R L Kravitz; M S Broder; D E Kanouse; J A Muñoz; J A Puyol; M Lara; K E Watkins; H Yang; E A McGlynn Journal: JAMA Date: 2001 May 23-30 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Bradford W Hesse; David E Nelson; Gary L Kreps; Robert T Croyle; Neeraj K Arora; Barbara K Rimer; Kasisomayajula Viswanath Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2005 Dec 12-26
Authors: Kendra L Schwartz; Thomas Roe; Justin Northrup; James Meza; Raouf Seifeldin; Anne Victoria Neale Journal: J Am Board Fam Med Date: 2006 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.657
Authors: James M Metz; Pamela Devine; Albert DeNittis; Heather Jones; Margaret Hampshire; Joel Goldwein; Richard Whittington Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2003-07-15 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: H A Tejeda; S B Green; E L Trimble; L Ford; J L High; R S Ungerleider; M A Friedman; O W Brawley Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 1996-06-19 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Goldy C George; Adrianna Buford; Kenneth Hess; Sarina A Piha-Paul; Ralph Zinner; Vivek Subbiah; Christina Hinojosa; Charles S Cleeland; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Elmer V Bernstam; David S Hong Journal: JCO Clin Cancer Inform Date: 2018-12
Authors: David S Hong; Goldy C George; Eucharia C Iwuanyanwu; Bahareh Tavana; Gerald S Falchook; Sarina A Piha-Paul; Jennifer J Wheler; Reena H Mistry; Xiudong Lei; Razelle Kurzrock Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2013-03-02 Impact factor: 4.553
Authors: David S Y Chan; Anita Willicombe; Thomas D Reid; Ceri Beaton; David Arnold; James Ward; I Llion Davies; Wyn G Lewis Journal: J Cancer Educ Date: 2012-12 Impact factor: 2.037