Literature DB >> 12576365

Patient use of the internet for information in a lung cancer clinic.

Michael W Peterson1, Peter C Fretz.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVES: To determine how frequently patients attending a lung cancer clinic use the Internet for their own health information, to determine whether there are demographic differences between Internet users and nonusers, and to determine how patients compare the quality of Internet information with other sources of lung cancer information.
DESIGN: Sequentially administered patient questionnaire. One hundred eighty-four patients were surveyed, and 139 patients (75.5%) completed the questionnaire.
SETTING: A multidisciplinary thoracic oncology clinic in a Midwestern University hospital. PATIENTS OR PARTICIPANTS: Patients attending the multidisciplinary thoracic oncology clinic over a 3-month period. MEASUREMENTS AND
RESULTS: The Internet was the most commonly used nonphysician source of information among our patients. Sixteen percent of the patients sought information on the Internet, but 60% expressed interest in using the Internet for information. Users were on average of higher income level and educational attainment but did not differ from nonusers by community size. Internet users rated the quality of information available on the Internet of similar quality to information from all sources.
CONCLUSIONS: Older patients are increasing using the Internet for self-education in lung cancer. While certain barriers continue to exist, patients from rural areas use the Internet to the same degree, as do patients from urban areas. Patients do, however, overrate the quality of information on the Internet.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12576365     DOI: 10.1378/chest.123.2.452

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  29 in total

1.  Toward a greater understanding of breast cancer patients' decisions to discuss cancer-related internet information with their doctors: an exploratory study.

Authors:  Thomas A D'Agostino; Jamie S Ostroff; Alexandra Heerdt; Maura Dickler; Yuelin Li; Carma L Bylund
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2012-06-19

2.  The utilization of Arabic online drug information among adults in Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Norah O Abanmy; Nouf A Al-Quait; Amani H Alami; Meshaal H Al-Juhani; Sinaa Al-Aqeel
Journal:  Saudi Pharm J       Date:  2012-07-23       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  The utilization of oncology web-based resources in Spanish-speaking Internet users.

Authors:  Charles B Simone; Margaret K Hampshire; Carolyn Vachani; James M Metz
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.339

4.  Internet Usage Trends in Thoracic Surgery Patients and Their Caregivers.

Authors:  Alisha D Lussiez; Stephanie Burdick; Sindhura Kodali; Gustavo Rubio; Jacob A Mack; Jules Lin; Andrew C Chang; Rishindra M Reddy
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.037

5.  Doctor-patient communication about cancer-related internet information.

Authors:  Carma L Bylund; Jennifer A Gueguen; Thomas A D'Agostino; Yuelin Li; Ellen Sonet
Journal:  J Psychosoc Oncol       Date:  2010

6.  Patient Internet use for health information at three urban primary care clinics.

Authors:  Suzanne Dickerson; Amber M Reinhart; Thomas Hugh Feeley; Rakesh Bidani; Ellen Rich; Vinod K Garg; Charles O Hershey
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2004-08-06       Impact factor: 4.497

7.  Internet use by cancer survivors: current use and future wishes.

Authors:  Lonneke V van de Poll-Franse; Mies C H J van Eenbergen
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2008-02-22       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  Patient information in radiation oncology: a cross-sectional pilot study using the EORTC QLQ-INFO26 module.

Authors:  Johannes Adler; Yvonne Paelecke-Habermann; Patrick Jahn; Margarete Landenberger; Bernd Leplow; Dirk Vordermark
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2009-09-28       Impact factor: 3.481

9.  Information needs and sources of information for patients during cancer follow-up.

Authors:  M A Shea-Budgell; X Kostaras; K P Myhill; N A Hagen
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 10.  A systematic review of patient acceptance of consumer health information technology.

Authors:  Calvin K L Or; Ben-Tzion Karsh
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2009-04-23       Impact factor: 4.497

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.