Literature DB >> 20556357

What have we learned from LCS mobile-bearing knee system?

Woo-Shin Cho1, Yoon-Seok Youm, Sung-Chan Ahn, Dong-Wook Sohn.   

Abstract

Three hundred and sixty-four low contact stress (LCS) total knee arthroplasties that could be followed up for more than 5 years were clinically and radiographically analyzed. The median postoperative Hospital for Special Surgery score improved from 56 (range 32-77) to 91 (range 64-100) points, but median range of motion did not change from 120° (range 50°-135°) to 120° (range 85°-135°). Complications occurred in 16 cases (4%), and included postoperative polyethylene dislocation and intraoperative tibial condylar fracture, while five knees (1%) required revision surgery due to mechanical reasons. The overall prosthesis survival rate was 91% at 12 years. Although the LCS mobile-bearing knee system has theoretical advantages in terms of wear and loosening, the problem of polyethylene dislocation, intraoperative tibial fracture, and radiolucent lines should be solved for long survival. The clinical relevance of this study is that the LCS system provided good clinical and survival results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20556357     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-010-1166-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  24 in total

1.  Fat-pad impingement after total knee arthroplasty with the LCS A/P-Glide system.

Authors:  Inès A Kramers-de Quervain; Ivette Engel-Bicik; Wolfgang Miehlke; Tomas Drobny; Urs Munzinger
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2004-03-16       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Morphometry of the proximal tibia to design the tibial component of total knee arthroplasty for the Korean population.

Authors:  Dai Soon Kwak; Sibin Surendran; Yassir Hussain Pengatteeri; Sang Eun Park; Kwang Nam Choi; Patinharayil Gopinathan; Seung Ho Han; Chang Whan Han
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2007-06-27       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Patellar resurfacing or retention in total knee arthroplasty. A prospective study of patients with bilateral replacements.

Authors:  P A Keblish; A K Varma; A S Greenwald
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1994-11

4.  The problem of surface damage in polyethylene total knee components.

Authors:  T M Wright; D L Bartel
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Failure of the polyethylene bearing surface of a total knee replacement within four years. A case report.

Authors:  G A Engh
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Effect of component fixation method on osteolysis in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  K A Ezzet; R Garcia; R L Barrack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Tibial insert undersurface as a contributing source of polyethylene wear debris.

Authors:  R C Wasielewski; N Parks; I Williams; H Surprenant; J P Collier; G Engh
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  The rotating platform mobile bearing TKA.

Authors:  R B Sorrells
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 1.390

9.  Dislocation/subluxation of meniscal bearing elements after New Jersey low-contact stress total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  J M Bert
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Long-term results of the total condylar knee arthroplasty. A 15-year survivorship study.

Authors:  C S Ranawat; W F Flynn; S Saddler; K K Hansraj; M J Maynard
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  4 in total

1.  PCL balancing, an example of the need to couple detailed biomechanical parameters with clinical functional outcome.

Authors:  P J C Heesterbeek; A B Wymenga
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Higher forgotten joint score for fixed-bearing than for mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  E Thienpont; D Zorman
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Migration and clinical outcome of mobile-bearing versus fixed-bearing single-radius total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Koen T Van Hamersveld; Perla J Marang-Van De Mheen; Huub J L Van Der Heide; Henrica M J Van Der Linden-Van Der Zwaag; Edward R Valstar; Rob G H H Nelissen
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 3.717

4.  No difference in clinical outcome, pain, and range of motion between fixed and mobile bearing Attune total knee arthroplasty: a prospective single-center trial.

Authors:  Paul Ruckenstuhl; Fabio Revelant; Georg Hauer; Gerwin A Bernhardt; Lukas Leitner; Gerald Gruber; Andreas Leithner; Patrick Sadoghi
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 2.562

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.